{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T18:10:04Z","timestamp":1793729404764,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background and Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Intrathecal bupivacaine is used for anaesthesia and analgesia but is associated with hypotension. Ropivacaine is an alternative drug that may have fewer cardiotoxic and neurotoxic events. This meta-analysis investigated whether intrathecal ropivacaine is associated with reduced hypotension as compared to bupivacaine.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The meta-analysis is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The databases PubMed, Cinahl Plus, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched, and papers from January 1980 to January 2023 were deemed eligible and filtered using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes were the duration of sensory block, duration of motor block, incidence of bradycardia, ephedrine usage, and duration of analgesia. Jadad scores were used to evaluate the quality of the papers. RevMan statistical software\u00ae utilised inverse variance and a random effect model to calculate the standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables and the Mantel\u2013Haenszel test and the random effect model to calculate the odds ratio for dichotomous variables.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Thirty-three papers, including 2475 patients in total, were included. The Jadad score was between 1 and 5. The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher with intrathecal bupivacaine than with ropivacaine (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.02). The duration of sensory block (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001) and motor block (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001) was prolonged with intrathecal bupivacaine. The duration of analgesia favoured intrathecal bupivacaine\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">(P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.003).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Intrathecal ropivacaine has a reduced incidence of hypotension and a reduced duration of sensory block compared to bupivacaine.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.ija_715_23","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,27]],"date-time":"2024-01-27T08:00:11Z","timestamp":1706342411000},"page":"129-141","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Intrathecal ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in a non-obstetric population- A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"68","author":[{"given":"Rashaad S.","family":"Khalil","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, Blackpool Teaching Hospital Foundation Trust, England"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aaliya","family":"Mehmud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Universitatea din Oradea, Romania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rahul","family":"Banerjee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Medicine, University of Buckingham, England"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rajiv","family":"Malhotra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arnab","family":"Banerjee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeg251","article-title":"Comparison of the effects of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for caesarean section","volume":"91","author":"Gautier","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R2-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1346","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200112000-00011","article-title":"Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean section","volume":"95","author":"Khaw","year":"2001","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R3-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-200012000-00030","article-title":"Intrathecal anaesthesia: Ropivacaine versus bupivacaine","volume":"91","author":"Malinovsky","year":"2000","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R4-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2017.11.002","article-title":"Association between postoperative mean arterial blood pressure and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery","volume":"120","author":"Van Lier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R5-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"910","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000003763","article-title":"Association between mean arterial pressure and acute kidney injury and a composite of myocardial injury and mortality in postoperative critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort analysis","volume":"47","author":"Khanna","year":"2019","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"key":"R6-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2018.04.036","article-title":"Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: A systematic review","volume":"121","author":"Wesselink","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R7-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1427","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200206000-00023","article-title":"Differences in cardiotoxicity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine are the result of physicochemical and stereoselective properties","volume":"96","author":"Graf","year":"2002","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R8-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2016.03.004","article-title":"Duration of motor block with intrathecal ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for caesarean section: A meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"Malhotra","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"R9-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e134732","DOI":"10.5812\/aapm-134732","article-title":"A comparative study on the effect of intrathecal bupivacaine vs. ropivacaine on maternal and neonatal outcomes after cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Jaafarpour","year":"2023","journal-title":"Anesth Pain Med"},{"key":"R10-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.169064","article-title":"Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine in lower limb and hip surgery: A comparison with hyperbaric bupivacaine","volume":"31","author":"Dar","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R11-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeg077","article-title":"Comparison of ropivacaine 0.5% (in glucose 5%) with bupivacaine 0.5% (in glucose 8%) for spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery","volume":"90","author":"Whiteside","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R12-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aen250","article-title":"Spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery: A comparison of hyperbaric solutions of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and Ropivacaine","volume":"101","author":"Luck","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R13-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.169086","article-title":"Comparison between intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl in elective infraumbilical orthopedic surgery: A randomized controlled study","volume":"3","author":"Layek","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R14-20260505","first-page":"713","article-title":"A comparison of intrathecal plain solutions containing ropivacaine 20 or 15 mg versus bupivacaine 10 mg","volume":"99","author":"Kallio","year":"2004","journal-title":"AnesthAnalg"},{"key":"R15-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2011.02447.x","article-title":"Comparison of intrathecal bupivacaine and ropivacaine with different doses of sufentanil","volume":"55","author":"Marrett","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R16-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1477","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2005.00864.x","article-title":"Randomized double-blind comparison of ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery","volume":"49","author":"Lee","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R17-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","article-title":"Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample","volume":"5","author":"Hozo","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"R18-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.14705","article-title":"Trial sequential analysis: Adding a new dimension to meta-analysis","volume":"75","author":"Shah","year":"2020","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R19-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.1016\/S0034-7094(09)70084-4","article-title":"Comparison of hemodynamic changes in acute intoxication with intravenous bupivacaine and ropivacaine in swine","volume":"59","author":"Melo","year":"2009","journal-title":"Braz J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R20-20260505","first-page":"271","article-title":"Cardiovascular effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia as a function of age: An observational study using echocardiography","volume":"34","author":"Lairez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med"},{"key":"R21-20260505","first-page":"141","article-title":"The place of ropivacaine in anesthesia","volume":"54","author":"Stienstra","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Anaesth Belg"},{"key":"R22-20260505","first-page":"724","article-title":"Comparison of bupivacaine-and ropivacaine-induced conduction in blockade in the isolated rabbit vagus nerve","volume":"68","author":"Bader","year":"1989","journal-title":"AnesthAnalg"},{"key":"R23-20260505","first-page":"127","article-title":"Ropivacaine in paediatric surgery: Preliminary results","volume":"8","author":"Ivani","year":"1998","journal-title":"PaediatrAnaesth"},{"key":"R25-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20.","DOI":"10.21037\/dmr-21-86","article-title":"Neuraxial anaesthesia and its role in enhanced recovery after surgery: A narrative review","volume":"5","author":"Agarwala","year":"2022","journal-title":"Dig Med Res"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R26-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S5","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.JOACP_238_16","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery: An Anesthesiologist's perspective","volume":"35","author":"Moningi","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R28-20260505","first-page":"73","article-title":"Ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in elective caesarean deliveries","volume":"2","author":"Dhalwani","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Pioneer Med Sci"},{"key":"R29-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1186\/s12939-021-01583-3","article-title":"Comprehensive economic evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery in hepatectomy","volume":"20","author":"Dong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Equity Health"},{"key":"R30-20260505","first-page":"182","article-title":"Comparison of the clinical effects of intrathecal ropivacaine and bupivacaine in geriatric patients undergoing transurethral resection","volume":"18","author":"Atabekoglu","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gazi Med J"},{"key":"R31-20260505","first-page":"27","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine versus intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine in elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgery","volume":"14","author":"Bansal","year":"2015","journal-title":"IOSR J Dent Med Sci"},{"key":"R32-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.4103\/0259-1162.123252","article-title":"Comparison of efficacy and safety of ropivacaine with bupivacaine for intrathecal anesthesia for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries","volume":"7","author":"Bhat","year":"2013","journal-title":"Anesth Essays Res"},{"key":"R33-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2006.03.006","article-title":"Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for intrathecal anesthesia during outpatient arthroscopic surgery","volume":"18","author":"Boztu\u011f","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R34-20260505","first-page":"539","article-title":"Subarachnoid blockade with ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in urologic and orthopedic surgery","volume":"47","author":"Hinojosa-S\u00e1nchez","year":"2009","journal-title":"Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc"},{"key":"R35-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5049.138985","article-title":"Comparison of intrathecal ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl for major lower limb orthopaedic surgery: A randomised double-blind study","volume":"58","author":"Jagtap","year":"2014","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R36-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0903700606","article-title":"Comparison of equipotent doses of ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery","volume":"37","author":"Koltka","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"R37-20260505","first-page":"65","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia: Comparison of plain ropivacaine, bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery","volume":"59","author":"Mantouvalou","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Belg"},{"key":"R38-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/89.5.702","article-title":"Spinal anaesthesia: Comparison of plain ropivacaine 5 mg ml-1 with bupivacaine 5 mg ml-1 for major orthopaedic surgery","volume":"89","author":"McNamee","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R39-20260505","first-page":"1.","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of intrathecal administration of newer local anaesthetic agents ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb surgery","volume":"17","author":"Mehta","year":"2007","journal-title":"Internet J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R40-20260505","first-page":"97","article-title":"Levobupivacaine or ropivacaine: A randomised double blind controlled trial using equipotent doses in spinal anaesthesia","volume":"44","author":"Athar","year":"2016","journal-title":"Colomb J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R41-20260505","first-page":"252","article-title":"Comparison of 0.75% spinal ropivacaine with 0.5% spinal ropivacaine for orthopedic surgery of lower limbs","volume":"25","author":"Ort\u00edz","year":"2002","journal-title":"Rev Mex Anestesiol"},{"key":"R42-20260505","first-page":"91","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine or levobupivacaine for lower limb surgeries","volume":"51","author":"Delfino","year":"2001","journal-title":"Rev Bras Anestesiol"},{"key":"R43-20260505","first-page":"38","article-title":"Comparison of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl and isobaric bupivacaine with fentanyl for spinal anesthesia for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery","volume":"22","author":"Saran","year":"2018","journal-title":"Anaesth Pain Intensive Care"},{"key":"R44-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.4103\/aer.AER_135_18","article-title":"Comparison of the efficacy of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine and bupivacaine in day care knee arthroscopy: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Kumar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Anesth Essays Res"},{"key":"R45-20260505","first-page":"28","article-title":"Observational study to compare the effect of intrathecal 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine and 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries","volume":"8","author":"Abhinav","year":"2018","journal-title":"Indian J Appl Res"},{"key":"R46-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.4038\/slja.v27i2.8414","article-title":"Intrathecal ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in endoscopic urological surgeries: A double blind randomized controlled trial","volume":"27","author":"Kordcal","year":"2019","journal-title":"Sri Lankan J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R47-20260505","first-page":"114","article-title":"Comparison of efficacy and safety of intrathecal ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries","volume":"25","author":"Prajwal","year":"2019","journal-title":"AmbulSurg"},{"key":"R48-20260505","first-page":"868","article-title":"Comparison between intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% with isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries: A double blind randomized controlled study","volume":"4","author":"Verma","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Contemp Med Res"},{"key":"R49-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.4103\/ijpn.ijpn_54_18","article-title":"Comparative efficacy and safety of intrathecal ropivacaine versus intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgical procedures","volume":"34","author":"Adhikari","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J Pain"},{"key":"R50-20260505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-6012.ijrms20210426","article-title":"A comparison of intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for elective surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study","volume":"9","author":"Kharat","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Res Med Sci"},{"key":"R51-20260505","first-page":"1172","article-title":"A Comparative study of intrathecal isobaric (0.75%) ropivacaine with isobaric (0.5%) bupivacaine for elective lower abdominal\/limb surgeries-A Clinical Study","volume":"2","author":"Surekha","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Res Health Sci"},{"key":"R52-20260505","first-page":"636","article-title":"Comparison of the effects of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial using isobaric preparations","volume":"2","author":"Hazra","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Inf Res Rev"},{"key":"R53-20260505","first-page":"237","article-title":"A clinical prospective, randomized study to compare intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine\u2013fentanyl and isobaric ropivacaine\u2013fentanyl for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries","volume":"16","author":"Varun","year":"2012","journal-title":"Anaesth Pain Intensive Care"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Anaesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ija.ija_715_23","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:41:15Z","timestamp":1786650075000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ija.ija_715_23"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,29]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ija.ija_715_23","relation":{},"ISSN":["0019-5049","0976-2817"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0019-5049","type":"print"},{"value":"0976-2817","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-07-27","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-10-01","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}