{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T16:35:20Z","timestamp":1787070920260,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]],"date-time":"2025-10-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761868800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background and Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Thoracic continuous spinal anaesthesia (TCSA) avoids airway instrumentation and mechanical ventilation and may provide better postoperative pulmonary outcomes compared to general anaesthesia (GA) with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for patients requiring laparotomy. The study compared postoperative pulmonary functions and outcomes between these two anaesthesia techniques.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Sixty adults were randomly assigned to Group GA+TEA or Group TCSA. In Group GA+TEA, the TEA was secured through the T9-T10 level, followed by GA. A 25-G catheter was placed at the same level in Group TCSA, and they received all preservative-free drugs (0.5% plain bupivacaine with 0.25 mg\/kg ketamine and 0.03 mg\/kg midazolam) to achieve a sensory block from T4 to L1. The primary outcome assessed was peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) over the 72 h postoperative period. The secondary outcomes assessed were breath-holding time (BHT), lung atelectasis, and change in transdiaphragmatic excursion. The two-sided Student\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test, Mann\u2013Whitney test, and Chi-squared test were used to analyse the data.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The PEFR was reduced in both groups from baseline (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001), with no difference between them (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.498). However, Group TCSA showed significantly better outcomes concerning BHT on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.048 and\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.005, respectively), reduced lung atelectasis at 1 h postoperatively (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.03), and greater diaphragmatic excursion at 1 h, POD 1 and 2 (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, the PEFRs during the postoperative period were comparable for GA with thoracic epidural versus thoracic continuous spinal anaesthesia.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.ija_886_25","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]],"date-time":"2025-10-31T19:01:28Z","timestamp":1761937288000},"page":"1237-1245","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of postoperative pulmonary functions and outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries between general anaesthesia with thoracic epidural and thoracic continuous spinal anaesthesia: An exploratory randomised study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"69","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-8376-6963","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gourav","family":"Kumar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9931-2316","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Praveen","family":"Talawar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Additional Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1205-7237","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gaurav","family":"Jain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5963-7549","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ruma","family":"Thakuria","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4847-4120","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Amit","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Professor, Department of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1622-1193","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nikita","family":"Choudhary","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aex002","article-title":"Postoperative pulmonary complications","volume":"118","author":"Miskovic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R2-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1066","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2018.02.007","article-title":"A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: Pulmonary complications","volume":"120","author":"Abbott","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R3-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5049.165857","article-title":"Postoperative pulmonary complications after non-cardiothoracic surgery","volume":"59","author":"Kelkar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R4-20260419","first-page":"e38786","article-title":"Postoperative pulmonary complications and perioperative strategies: A systematic review","volume":"15","author":"Lusquinhos","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"R5-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/s13741-023-00324-0","article-title":"Postoperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal surgery: A retrospective cohort analysis","volume":"12","author":"Pirie","year":"2023","journal-title":"Perioper Med (Lond)"},{"key":"R6-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.24015\/JAPM.2014.0008","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and perioperative lung protection","volume":"1","author":"Huang","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Anesth Perioper Med"},{"key":"R7-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-2113.156245","article-title":"Lung ultrasound: Present and future","volume":"32","author":"Saraogi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lung India"},{"key":"R8-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e20200064","DOI":"10.36416\/1806-3756\/e20200064","article-title":"Diaphragmatic ultrasound: A review of its methodological aspects and clinical uses","volume":"46","author":"Santana","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Bras Pneumol"},{"key":"R9-20260419","first-page":"95","article-title":"Postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: Risk factors and predictive models","author":"Garg","year":"2025","journal-title":"Monaldi Arch Chest Dis"},{"key":"R10-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aem058","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under segmental thoracic spinal anaesthesia: A feasibility study","volume":"98","author":"van Zundert","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R11-20260419","first-page":"543","article-title":"The comparison of spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia on the postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements after elective lower abdominal surgery: A randomized, double-blinded study","volume":"18","author":"Naghibi","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Res Med Sci"},{"key":"R12-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.4103\/1658-354X.140853","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Thoracic vs. Lumbar technique","volume":"8","author":"Imbelloni","year":"2014","journal-title":"Saudi J Anaesth"},{"key":"R13-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.23736\/S0375-9393.19.13896-5","article-title":"Thoracic continuous spinal anesthesia for high-risk comorbid older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: One-year experience of an Italian geriatric hospital","volume":"86","author":"Spannella","year":"2020","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"},{"key":"R14-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.143.10.990","article-title":"Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: A meta-analysis","volume":"143","author":"P\u00f6pping","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"R15-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.5455\/medarh.2014.68.279-281","article-title":"Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 6% and crystalloids for preloading in elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia","volume":"68","author":"Alimian","year":"2014","journal-title":"Med Arch"},{"key":"R16-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.04.034","article-title":"Use of spinal anesthesia does not reduce intraoperative blood loss","volume":"70","author":"Wong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"R17-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1177\/1756287218795427","article-title":"Radical cystectomy in frail octogenarians in thoracic continuous spinal anesthesia and analgesia: A pilot study","volume":"10","author":"Castellani","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ther Adv Urol"},{"key":"R18-20260419","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sopen.2020.07.002","article-title":"Continuous thoracic spinal anesthesia with local anesthetic plus midazolam and ketamine is superior to local anesthetic plus fentanyl in major abdominal surgery","volume":"2","author":"Vincenzi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Open Sci"},{"key":"R19-20260419","first-page":"CD010108","article-title":"Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: An overview of Cochrane systematic reviews","volume":"2014","author":"Guay","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Anaesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ija.ija_886_25","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:38:55Z","timestamp":1787067535000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ija.ija_886_25"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ija.ija_886_25","relation":{},"ISSN":["0019-5049","0976-2817"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0019-5049","type":"print"},{"value":"0976-2817","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-07-09","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-09-26","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}