{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T19:27:43Z","timestamp":1787772463725,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Hand eczema (HE), foot eczema (FE), and hand\u2013foot eczema (HFE) manifest on exposure to various agents in day-to-day life or in occupations or both.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The objectives of this study were to identify pattern of allergens causing HE, FE, and HFE and to identify multiple and concurrent contact allergies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A study was conducted from October 2013 to August 2015 which included 190 patients. Patch test was performed for 78.94% of patients (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 150). The statistical tests used were descriptive, Cramer's V, and Chi-square tests.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The most commonly affected group was HFE (55.8%) followed by HE (22.1%) and FE (22.1%). Allergens showed positivity either singly 56.3% (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 67) or in combination 43.69% (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 52). Nickel (41.79%) was the most common allergen in all the three groups followed by potassium dichromate. Late reactions (after day 7) were observed in 17.64% of patients (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 21). Nickel was observed in 42.85% (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 9) and paraphenylenediamine was observed in 28.57% of patients (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 6) with\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      values of &lt;0.001 and 0.050, respectively. Multiple contact allergies were seen in 44% of patients (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 52). Concurrent reactions (55.8% [\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 29]), polysensitization (34.6% [\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 18]), and mixed reactions (9.6% [\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 5]) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      value of &lt;0.001) were observed.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Significant multiple contact allergies including concurrent reactions with nickel sulfate, potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride, and polysensitization were observed. No significant differences in allergen pattern were observed in HE, FE, and HFE.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Recommendation:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Day 7 reading is recommended in HFE.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijd.ijd_549_16","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,29]],"date-time":"2024-05-29T12:20:44Z","timestamp":1716985244000},"page":"329","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Allergens in Hand, Foot, and Hand\u2013Foot Eczema"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"66","author":[{"given":"S","family":"Sahana","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"SG","family":"Chethana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"GR","family":"Kanthraj","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jayadev","family":"Betkerur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2009.01669.x","article-title":"The epidemiology of hand eczema in the general population \u2013 Prevalence and main findings","volume":"62","author":"Thyssen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R2-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.4103\/0378-6323.16244","article-title":"Hand eczema \u2013 Clinical patterns and role of patch testing","volume":"71","author":"Kishore","year":"2005","journal-title":"Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol"},{"key":"R3-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0105-1873.2004.00423.x","article-title":"A survey of occupational hand eczema in Denmark","volume":"51","author":"Skoet","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R4-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2011.01943.x","article-title":"Patch testing in children with hand eczema. A 5-year multicentre study in Spain","volume":"65","author":"Toledo","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R5-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2012.02046.x","article-title":"Patch test characteristics of patients referred for suspected contact allergy of the feet \u2013 Retrospective 10-year cross-sectional study of the IVDK data","volume":"66","author":"Landeck","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R6-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01313.x","article-title":"Age and sex incidence of allergic contact dermatitis","volume":"15","author":"Walton","year":"1986","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R7-20-20240829","first-page":"360","article-title":"Footwear dermatitis: Historical background, epidemiology, clinical connotation-part II","volume":"12","author":"Sehgal","year":"2014","journal-title":"Skinmed"},{"key":"R8-20-20240829","first-page":"304","article-title":"Contact hypersensitivity in hand eczema. A study with Indian standard series of allergens","volume":"1","author":"Trehan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Med J"},{"key":"R9-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.4103\/0378-6323.34008","article-title":"Patch testing experience with 1000 patients","volume":"73","author":"Bajaj","year":"2007","journal-title":"Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol"},{"key":"R10-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04439.x","article-title":"Mercury exanthem","volume":"9","author":"Nakayama","year":"1983","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R11-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0105-1873.2005.00608.x","article-title":"Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey","volume":"52","author":"Akyol","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R12-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04354.x","article-title":"Contact allergy to petrolatums. (I). Sensitizing capacity of different brands of yellow and white petrolatums","volume":"9","author":"Dooms-Goossens","year":"1983","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R13-20-20240829","first-page":"183","article-title":"Monitoring of heavy metal concentration in groundwater of Hakinaka Taluk, India","volume":"3","author":"Rajappa","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contemp Eng Sci"},{"key":"R14-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1002\/jat.3129","article-title":"Metals in cosmetics: Implications for human health","volume":"35","author":"Borowska","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Appl Toxicol"},{"key":"R15-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0536.46.s4.29_102.x","article-title":"Risk factors for contact allergy to nickel \u2013 Results of a multifactorial analysis","volume":"48","author":"Uter","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R16-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0536.2000.043004212.x","article-title":"Repeated exposures to cobalt or chromate on the hands of patients with hand eczema and contact allergy to that metal","volume":"43","author":"Nielsen","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R17-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2009.01563.x","article-title":"Age- and sex-related variations in allergic contact dermatitis to common allergens","volume":"61","author":"Garg","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R18-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2011.01988.x","article-title":"Excessive nickel release from mobile phones \u2013 A persistent cause of nickel allergy and dermatitis","volume":"65","author":"Jensen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R19-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.4103\/0378-6323.44315","article-title":"Patch testing in hand eczema at a tertiary care center","volume":"74","author":"Laxmisha","year":"2008","journal-title":"Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol"},{"key":"R21-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.4103\/0378-6323.35731","article-title":"Thin-layer rapid-use epicutaneous test (TRUE test)","volume":"73","author":"Jerajani","year":"2007","journal-title":"Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol"},{"key":"R22-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2133.2006.07159.x","article-title":"Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: A prospective multicentre investigation of the German contact dermatitis research group","volume":"154","author":"Hillen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Br J Dermatol"},{"key":"R23-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0536.2001.440503.x","article-title":"The risk of active sensitization to PPD","volume":"44","author":"Devos","year":"2001","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R24-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaad.2008.04.022","article-title":"Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: The Mayo clinic experience","volume":"59","author":"Davis","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Am Acad Dermatol"},{"key":"R25-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2010.01855.x","article-title":"Late reactions to patch test preparations with reduced concentrations of p-phenylenediamine: A multicentre investigation of the German contact dermatitis research group","volume":"64","author":"Hillen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R26-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2230.1991.tb00313.x","article-title":"Graded continuity, or all or none \u2013 Studies of the human immune response","volume":"16","author":"Friedmann","year":"1991","journal-title":"Clin Exp Dermatol"},{"key":"R27-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/0015-6264(74)90367-8","article-title":"The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: Experimental contact sensitization in man","volume":"12","author":"Marzulli","year":"1974","journal-title":"Food Cosmet Toxicol"},{"key":"R28-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1038\/jid.1966.159","article-title":"The identification of contact allergens by human assay. II. Factors influencing the induction and measurement of allergic contact dermatitis","volume":"47","author":"Kligman","year":"1966","journal-title":"J Invest Dermatol"},{"key":"R29-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2006.00906.x","article-title":"The impact of exposure variables on the induction of skin sensitization","volume":"55","author":"Basketter","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R30-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2133.1990.tb07284.x","article-title":"Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: The additive effect of allergens in combination","volume":"122","author":"McLelland","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Dermatol"},{"key":"R31-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2133.1998.02363.x","article-title":"Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: A study of fragrance-sensitized individuals","volume":"139","author":"Johansen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Dermatol"},{"key":"R32-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1001\/archderm.1991.01680060090010","article-title":"'Irritants' increase the response to an allergen in allergic contact dermatitis","volume":"127","author":"McLelland","year":"1991","journal-title":"Arch Dermatol"},{"key":"R33-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2230.2002.00997.x","article-title":"Irritant dermatitis, irritancy and its role in allergic contact dermatitis","volume":"27","author":"Smith","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Exp Dermatol"},{"key":"R34-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.2007.01232.x","article-title":"Patients with multiple contact allergies: A review","volume":"58","author":"Carlsen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R35-20-20240829","first-page":"232","article-title":"Susceptibility and amplification of sensitivity in contact dermatitis","volume":"61","author":"Moss","year":"1985","journal-title":"Clin Exp Immunol"},{"key":"R36-20-20240829","first-page":"197","article-title":"German Contact Dermatitis Research Group and the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology in Germany. Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens","volume":"12","author":"Brasch","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Contact Dermat"},{"key":"R37-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01661.x","article-title":"Computerized analysis of concomitant contact allergens","volume":"24","author":"Edman","year":"1991","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R38-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/S1046-199X(99)90072-6","article-title":"Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997","volume":"10","author":"Albert","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Contact Dermat"},{"key":"R39-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00783.x","article-title":"Concomitant positive patch test results with standard screening tray in North America 1985-1989","volume":"32","author":"Holness","year":"1995","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R40-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0105-1873.2005.00541.x","article-title":"Monitoring the European standard series in 10 centres 1996-2000","volume":"53","author":"Bruynzeel","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R41-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0536.2002.470107.x","article-title":"Epidemiology of contact allergy: An estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug-utilization research (CE-DUR) approach","volume":"47","author":"Schnuch","year":"2002","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"},{"key":"R42-20-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1997.tb02435.x","article-title":"National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population-adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK)","volume":"37","author":"Schnuch","year":"1997","journal-title":"Contact Dermatitis"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Dermatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijd.IJD_549_16","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T18:48:22Z","timestamp":1787770102000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijd.IJD_549_16"}},"subtitle":["An Intercomparison by Patch Testing"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijd.ijd_549_16","relation":{},"ISSN":["0019-5154"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0019-5154","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5]]}}}