{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T15:29:46Z","timestamp":1787758186895,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"abstract":"\n Introduction:<\/jats:title>\n Determination of difference between conventional and passive self-ligating brackets (SLBs) in respect of extraction space closure, patient perception and root resorption.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Material and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n Eighty patients were divided into four groups of 20 each with age-sex-matched control using a simple randomisation technique and allocation concealment with a closed opaque envelope method. Group 1 consisted of conventional brackets with Connecticut New Archwire (CNA) wire mushroom loop, group 2 consisted of conventional brackets with TAD (AbsoAnchor, Korea) supported retraction, group 3 consisted of passive SLB with CNA archwires (Libral Traders, India) mushroom loop and group 4 consisted of passive SLB brackets with TAD (AbsoAnchor, Korea) supported retraction. The rate of retraction, root resorption and patient satisfaction were assessed. All conventional brackets (Orthox, USA) and passive SLBs (CaptainOrtho, India) had 0.018 Roth prescriptions with a slot size of 0.018 \u00d7 0.025.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n \n Retraction was the fastest in group 2 with a mean of 1.266 \u00b1 0.14 mm\/4 week and a duration of 23.40 weeks. Similarly, group 4 showed the most sluggish movement with a mean of 1.182 \u00b1 0.80 mm\/4 weeks with a total duration of 25 weeks; howeverdifferencesce among groups were not statistically significant (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.470).\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n SLBs have advantage of better patient comfort, less pain and reduced chairside time. Though the present study found increased treatment duration with SLB along with friction mechanics, refuting the previous claims of reduced friction with SLBs, however, the difference was not statistically significant and results have to be extrapolated with caution and experience considering other advantages of SLBs.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_1127_21","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,9]],"date-time":"2022-08-09T07:32:57Z","timestamp":1660030377000},"page":"52-57","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparative Evaluation of Duration of Extraction Space Closure and Degree of Root Resorption with Conventional and Self-Ligation Brackets"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Raj Kumar","family":"Maurya","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Preeti","family":"Bhardwaj","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Harpreet","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Harsh Ashok","family":"Mishra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2007.04.028","article-title":"Self-ligating vs conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding Mechanics","volume":"132","author":"Miles","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R2-11-20240828","first-page":"641","article-title":"Self-ligating appliances: Evolution or revolution?","volume":"42","author":"Fleming","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Orthod"},{"key":"R3-11-20240828","first-page":"192","article-title":"Comparison of resistance to sliding produced by self-ligating brackets and conventional brackts ligated with conventional elastomeric ligature and low-friction ligatures","volume":"23","author":"Nieto","year":"2012","journal-title":"Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq"},{"key":"R4-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2005.07.018","article-title":"Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: Effects of archwire size and material","volume":"131","author":"Turnbull","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R5-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2007.01.032","article-title":"External apical root resorption in patients treated with conventional and self-ligating brackets","volume":"134","author":"Pandis","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R6-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2008.04.018","article-title":"Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: A randomized clinical trial","volume":"134","author":"Scott","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R7-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1007\/s00056-018-0133-5","article-title":"Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets: A cone-beam computed tomography study","volume":"79","author":"Aras","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Orofac Orthop"},{"key":"R8-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.10.025","article-title":"Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: A clinical cephalometric study","volume":"134","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R9-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjs046","article-title":"A prospective comparative study between differential moments and miniscrews in anchorage control","volume":"35","author":"Davoody","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"R10-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2009.12.027","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques","volume":"138","author":"Xu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R11-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c332","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c332","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trial","volume":"340","author":"Sculz Altman","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC"},{"key":"R12-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/10.1.30","article-title":"Evaluation of the risk of root resorption during orthodontic treatment: A study of upper incisors","volume":"10","author":"Lavender","year":"1988","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"R13-11-20240828","first-page":"259","article-title":"Effects of 'low light laser' and 'light emitting diode' mediated 'photo-bio-dynamic' therapy on clinical & biomechanical efficiency of orthodontic mini-implants- A randomized control trial","volume":"51","author":"Maurya","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Orthod"},{"key":"R14-11-20240828","first-page":"156","article-title":"Effects of low-level laser and low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on orthodontic treatment duration and associated pain perception-A prospective split-mouth controlled clinical trial","volume":"53","author":"Maurya","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Clin Orthod"},{"key":"R15-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2007.03.038","article-title":"Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: Comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes","volume":"135","author":"Kuroda","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"R16-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjt046","article-title":"Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"36","author":"Al-Sibaie","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"R17-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"012060","DOI":"10.1088\/1742-6596\/884\/1\/012060","article-title":"Comparison of conventional study model measurements and 3D digital study model measurements from laser scanned dental impressions","volume":"884","author":"Nugrahani","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Phys Conf Ser"},{"key":"R18-11-20240828","first-page":"238","article-title":"Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional brackets using cone-beam CT","volume":"25","author":"Liu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue"},{"key":"R19-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.3889\/oamjms.2018.066","article-title":"Evaluating the amount of tooth movement and root resorption during canine retraction with friction versus frictionless mechanics using cone beam computed tomography","volume":"6","author":"Makhlouf","year":"2018","journal-title":"Open Access Maced J Med Sci"},{"key":"R20-11-20240828","first-page":"45","article-title":"Comparison of apical root resorption encountered during maxillary incisor retraction using stainless steel boot loop and TMA boot loop \u2013 A case series","volume":"6","author":"Gupta","year":"2016","journal-title":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Dental Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_1127_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T15:08:15Z","timestamp":1787756895000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_1127_21"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_1127_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9290"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9290","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}}}