{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T16:33:37Z","timestamp":1787762017499,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The goal of this research was to see how reliable and valid three selected parameters from different analysis were in detecting the vertical skeletal pattern.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There were 94 cephalometric x-rays used in all. The vertical skeletal pattern was assessed using the mandibular plane angle by Steiner, Frankfort mandibular angle by Tweed, and facial axis angle by McNamara. According to the diagnostic results of the majority of the measures, the samples were classified as normo-divergent, hypodivergent, or hyperdivergent. Kappa statistics, positive predictive value, and sensitivity were employed to verify the validity and reliability of the analyses.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A statistically significant weak negative correlation was found between Frankfort mandibular angle and facial axis angle in female group (p value &lt; 0.01). A good agreement was found between mandibular plane angle with final diagnosis (K = 0.726). The mandibular plane angle showed highest sensitivity and positive predictive value in hypodivergent group (0.939, 0.816) and normo-divergent group (0.795, 0.833), respectively.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>For determining the facial vertical growth pattern the most accurate indicators were identified to be mandibular plane angle (SN-GoGn) and Frankfort mandibular angle.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_233_22","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,6]],"date-time":"2023-07-06T03:34:36Z","timestamp":1688614476000},"page":"49-53","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Evaluating Diagnostic Performance of Three Cephalometric Vertical Parameters"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Saya M.","family":"Azeez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.09.021","article-title":"How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?","volume":"139","author":"Devereux","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R2-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.4067\/S0717-95022018000100169","article-title":"Comparison between Ricketts and McNamara techniques for the determination of the maxilla and mandible position in Ecuadorian youths","volume":"36","author":"Guerrero","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Morphol"},{"key":"R3-11-20240828","first-page":"64690","article-title":"A comparative cephalometric study to assess the reliability of various vertical cephalometric parameters for assessment of growth pattern","volume":"10","author":"Qadir","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Curr Res"},{"key":"R4-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1590\/2177-6709.21.4.041-049.oar","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern","volume":"21","author":"Ahmed","year":"2016","journal-title":"Dental Press J Orthod"},{"key":"R5-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1590\/S0103-64402004000100013","article-title":"Dental-skeletal dimensions in growing individuals with variations in the lower facial height","volume":"15","author":"Enoki","year":"2004","journal-title":"Braz Dent J"},{"key":"R6-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1590\/2177-6709.23.5.075-081.oar","article-title":"Diagnostic Validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern","volume":"23","author":"Ahmed","year":"2018","journal-title":"Dental Press J Orthod"},{"key":"R7-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(53)90082-7","article-title":"Cephalometrics for you and me","volume":"39","author":"Steiner","year":"1953","journal-title":"Am J Orthod"},{"key":"R8-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9416(84)90352-X","article-title":"A method of cephalometric evaluation","volume":"86","author":"McNamara","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Orthod"},{"key":"R9-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/0096-6347(46)90001-4","article-title":"The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis","volume":"32","author":"Tweed","year":"1946","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Oral Surg"},{"key":"R11-11-20240828","first-page":"14","article-title":"Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth","volume":"27","author":"Ricketts","year":"1957","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"R12-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(94)70007-9","article-title":"Longitudinal changes in the adult facial profile","volume":"105","author":"Formby","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R13-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9416(85)80046-4","article-title":"Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types","volume":"88","author":"Bishara","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Orthod"},{"key":"R14-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.12816\/0028744","article-title":"Facial proportions in different mandibular rotations in Class I individuals","volume":"5","author":"Bahrou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Arab J Dent"},{"key":"R15-11-20240828","first-page":"1","article-title":"Reliability of the existing vertical dysplasia indicators in assessing a definitive growth pattern","volume":"16","author":"Rizwan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Rev Latinoam Ortodon Odontop"},{"key":"R17-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sodo.2015.07.001","article-title":"Implementation of ultra-low-dose CBCT for routine 2D orthodontic diagnostic radiographs: Cephalometric landmark identification and image quality assessment","volume":"21","author":"Kusnoto","year":"2015","journal-title":"Semin Orthod"},{"key":"R18-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sodo.2015.07.007","article-title":"3-Dimensional cone-beam computed tomography superimposition: A review","volume":"21","author":"Park","year":"2015","journal-title":"Semin Orthod"},{"key":"R19-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e311","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000001700","article-title":"Two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry using cone beam computed tomography scans","volume":"26","author":"Cassetta","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"key":"R20-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rmo.2016.03.024","article-title":"Comparative study between cone-beam and digital lateral head film cephalometric measurements","volume":"3","author":"Huerta","year":"2015","journal-title":"Rev Mex Ortodon"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Dental Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_233_22","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T16:11:42Z","timestamp":1787760702000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_233_22"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_233_22","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9290"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9290","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}}}