{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,11]],"date-time":"2026-10-11T05:15:54Z","timestamp":1791695754112,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,1]],"date-time":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735689600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background\/Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Smile analysis is a determinant tool for the assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome. This study aimed to evaluate and compare dynamic smile before and after twin block therapy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This prospective study was conducted on 30 subjects in age group of 11\u201314 years (mean age = 12.80 \u00b1 1.2 years). Dynamic smile was recorded by videography at two time points, that is pre- (T0) and post- (T1) twin block therapy. Measurements were made on frontal rest and smile photographs. A paired\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test was used for comparison of changes at T0 and T1.\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2264 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>At full smile, significant increase was observed in upper lip length (0.97 mm), lower lip length (1.96 mm) and thickness (0.52 mm), stomion inferius to supramentale (1.96 mm), lower lip to maxillary incisor (0.70 mm), distance from upper incisal edge to inferior portion of lower lip (1.73 mm), interlabial gap (1.26 mm), soft tissue lower facial height (3.59 mm), buccal corridor ratio (0.03), smile width (2.06 mm), maxillary intercanine width (3.61 mm) and width of all visible maxillary teeth (3.65 mm) following twin block therapy. Buccal corridor showed significant decrease (1.02\u20131.16 mm) post-twin block appliance therapy. At rest, statistically significant increase was observed in the upper lip length (1.60 mm), lower lip length (2.99 mm) and thickness (1.28 mm), stomion inferius-supramentale (4.47 mm) and soft tissue lower facial height (3.13 mm), whereas maxillary incisor exposure (2.09 mm) and interlabial gap (2.06 mm) showed significant decrease.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Dynamic smile assessment revealed a significant improvement in smile aesthetics following twin block therapy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_328_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,10]],"date-time":"2025-04-10T11:00:30Z","timestamp":1744282830000},"page":"26-31","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Dynamic Smile Evaluation Following Twin Block Appliance Therapy in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion - A Prospective Study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Navneet","family":"Singh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dentistry, Unit of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tulika","family":"Tripathi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Saumya","family":"Kakkar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Priyank","family":"Rai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Isha","family":"Duggal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250531","first-page":"221","article-title":"Smile analysis and design in the digital era","volume":"36","author":"Ackerman","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Clin Orthod"},{"key":"R2-20250531","first-page":"3","article-title":"Assessment of skeletal and dental pattern of Class II division 1 malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice","volume":"8","author":"Sidlauskas","year":"2006","journal-title":"Stomatologija"},{"key":"R3-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2003.06.001","article-title":"Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance:A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2:Psychosocial effects","volume":"124","author":"O'Brien","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R4-20250531","first-page":"e30704","article-title":"Characteristics and dynamics of smile in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion versus class I malocclusion using still digital video captures:A three-group, cross-sectional, comparative study","volume":"14","author":"Kabalan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"R5-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(03)00306-8","article-title":"Dynamic smile visualization and quantification:Part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture","volume":"124","author":"Sarver","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R6-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.4103\/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_150_21","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of various parameters of spontaneous smile captured by conventional photographic method, video clip method, and direct biometric method","volume":"17","author":"Shah","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Datta Meghe Instit Med Sci Univ"},{"key":"R7-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jobcr.2021.01.001","article-title":"An orthodontic analysis of the smile dynamics with videography","volume":"11","author":"Rao","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Oral Biol Craniofac Res"},{"key":"R8-20250531","first-page":"255","article-title":"Soft tissue esthetic changes following a modified twin block appliance therapy:A prospective study","volume":"13","author":"Shahamfar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Clin Ped Dent"},{"key":"R9-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjm121","article-title":"Comparison of the effects of twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile","volume":"30","author":"Varl\u0131k","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"R10-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9928101","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/9928101","article-title":"Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue changes after functional therapy","volume":"2021","author":"Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m","year":"2021","journal-title":"Scanning"},{"key":"R11-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.2319\/040112-268.1","article-title":"Dynamics of a smile in different age groups","volume":"83","author":"Chetan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"R12-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.2319\/012616-69.1","article-title":"Dynamic smile evaluation in different skeletal patterns","volume":"86","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2016","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"R13-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2005.07.004","article-title":"Smile esthetics:Perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles","volume":"129","author":"I\u015f\u0131ksal","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R14-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.04.046","article-title":"Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index","volume":"133","author":"Krishnan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R15-20250531","first-page":"557","article-title":"Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen","volume":"76","author":"Parekh","year":"2006","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"R16-20250531","first-page":"23","article-title":"Analysis of gingival display during static and dynamic smiles in a Turkish sample:A clinical study","volume":"56","author":"Arifa\u011fao\u011flu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur Oral Res"},{"key":"R17-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2004.03.042","article-title":"The spontaneous smile in dynamic motion","volume":"128","author":"Tarantili","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R18-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2013.07.012","article-title":"Photographic and videographic assessment of the smile:Objective and subjective evaluations of posed and spontaneous smiles","volume":"144","author":"Walder","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R19-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2019.06.009","article-title":"Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion:A cross-sectional study","volume":"17","author":"Khan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Orthod"},{"key":"R20-20250531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjq082","article-title":"Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion","volume":"33","author":"Jamilian","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Dental Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_328_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T20:09:35Z","timestamp":1787774975000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_328_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_328_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9290","1998-3603"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9290","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3603","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-05-07","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-01-07","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}