{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T16:42:56Z","timestamp":1786725776184,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751328000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The aim was to compare the gingival tissue response following placement of a light-cure dressing (Barricaid\n                      <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                      ) and a non-eugenol periodontal dressing (Coe-Pak\u2122) after a periodontal flap procedure.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 14 patients with chronic generalised periodontitis requiring surgery in at least two different quadrants were enrolled for this split-mouth study. After periodontal flap surgery, Coe-Pak\u2122 was placed in the quadrant assigned to Group I, and Barricaid\n                      <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                      was placed in the other quadrant assigned to Group II. Clinical parameters were recorded on day 7 and day 14. Patient comfort and pain levels were also evaluated by a questionnaire.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There were no statistically significant differences in wound healing and the clinical gingival parameters between the two groups. The only significant difference was found in the plaque attached underneath the dressing, with Coe-Pak\u2122 showing greater plaque accumulation than Barricaid\n                      <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                      . Seventy-five (75%) of the patients preferred Barricaid\n                      <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                      over Coe-Pak\u2122, based on its appearance and taste. According to the oral and periodontal conditions, the predominant species isolated from plaque samples were followed by Gram-positive organisms, Gram-negative organisms were also found.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The non-eugenol dressing seemed to retain more plaque on its undersurface than the light-cure dressing. However, this did not have much influence on the healing outcome and clinical gingival parameters, which were optimal and comparable in both groups. The greater number of patients showed a preference for light-cure dressing, based on its superior aesthetics and taste.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_68_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]],"date-time":"2026-01-02T14:00:08Z","timestamp":1767362408000},"page":"316-320","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Gingival Tissue Response with Light-Cure Dressing and a Non-Eugenol Dressing after Periodontal Flap Surgery - A Comparative Study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Arunagiri","family":"Karunanithi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Gorimedu, Puducherry, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anil M.","family":"Melath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Mahe, Puducherry, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Subair","family":"Kayakool","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Mahe, Puducherry, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Venkat","family":"Raghavan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Mahe, Puducherry, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Arulvizhi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Gorimedu, Puducherry, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N","family":"Prakash","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontics, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-124X.124494","article-title":"Light-cured resin \u201cBarricaid\u201d - An aesthetic and biocompatible dressing: A step ahead","volume":"17","author":"Madan","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Indian Soc Periodontol"},{"key":"R2-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10024-2631","article-title":"Assessment of clinical efficacy of different periodontal dressing materials on wound healing: A comparative study","volume":"20","author":"Kumar","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Contemp Dent Pract"},{"key":"R3-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.4103\/IJDS.IJDS_42_20","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of gingival response following the placement of light-cured dressing and non-eugenol dressing after periodontal flap surgery: A clinical study","volume":"12","author":"Srivastava","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J Dent Sci"},{"key":"R4-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/0109-5641(90)90045-G","article-title":"Properties of periodontal dressings","volume":"6","author":"von Fraunhofer","year":"1990","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"R5-20260121","first-page":"34","article-title":"Gingival Healing III. The effects of periodontal dressings on gingivectomy repair","volume":"40","author":"Stahl","year":"1969","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"R6-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.1974.tb01244.x","article-title":"Dressing after reverse bevel flap procedures","volume":"1","author":"Greensmith","year":"1974","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"key":"R7-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1975.46.8.469","article-title":"Antibacterial properties of periodontal dressings","volume":"46","author":"O'Neil","year":"1975","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"R8-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.1976.tb01851.x","article-title":"The use of chlorhexidine mouthwash compared with a periodontal dressing following the gingivectomy procedure","volume":"3","author":"Addy","year":"1976","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"key":"R9-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s007840050077","article-title":"Cytocompatibility of periodontal dressing materials in fibroblast and primary human osteoblast-like cultures","volume":"3","author":"Alpar","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"R10-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.1992.tb01712.x","article-title":"Histological evaluation of surgically treated oral tissues after application of a photocuring periodontal dressing material. An animal study","volume":"19","author":"Smeekens","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"key":"R11-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1994.65.4.324","article-title":"The effect of a light-cured periodontal dressing material on HeLa cells and fibroblasts in vitro","volume":"65","author":"Gilbert","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"R12-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1186\/s40824-017-0095-5","article-title":"Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: A review","volume":"21","author":"Sheikh","year":"2017","journal-title":"Biomater Res"},{"key":"R13-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3642","DOI":"10.5958\/0976-5506.2019.04154.8","article-title":"Comparison of effectiveness of COE PAK and barricaid with respect to wound healing and patient satisfaction","volume":"10","author":"Arunachalam","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian J Public Health Res Dev"},{"key":"R14-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1978.49.11.576","article-title":"A comparison of a periodontal dressing and chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash after the internal bevelled flap procedure","volume":"49","author":"Newman","year":"1978","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"R15-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1556\/avet.52.2004.1.4","article-title":"Effects of periodontal dressings on fibroblasts and gingival wound healing in dogs","volume":"52","author":"Petelin","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Vet Hung"},{"key":"R16-20260121","first-page":"105","article-title":"Influence of orthodontic treatment on oral streptococci","volume":"70","author":"Vizitiu","year":"2011","journal-title":"Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol"},{"key":"R17-20260121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.micpath.2016.01.021","article-title":"Phenotypic identification of Porphyromonas gingivalis validated with matrix-assisted laser desorption\/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry","volume":"94","author":"Rams","year":"2016","journal-title":"Microb Pathog"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Dental Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_68_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T16:25:31Z","timestamp":1786724731000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_68_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijdr.ijdr_68_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9290","1998-3603"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9290","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3603","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-01-27","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-08-04","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}