{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T18:22:03Z","timestamp":1792002123116,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the perimetric outcomes using a free application program of the iPad, 'Visual Fields Easy' (VFE), and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (HVFA), in normal as well as eyes with glaucomatous damage of varying severity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this prospective, cross-sectional, observational pilot investigation, visual field testing was carried out in 210 eyes of 210 patients (60 Normal, 150 Glaucoma), using suprathreshold VFE application (Version 8) on the iPad and Standard White-on-White using HVFA. Severity of glaucoma was categorized using Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish criteria for visual field defects. The results of the VFE program were compared to the 24-2 SITA FAST HVFA.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Data of 210 patients, 100 (47.6%) females, and 110 (52.4%) males, age ranging from 42 to 78 years, Mean 56.64 \u00b1 10.67 years, was analyzed. The Spearman correlation coefficient showed a significant inverse relationship between missed points on the VFE app with MD (S = \u20130.783) and a parabolic relationship with PSD (S = 0.646) values obtained with the HVFA. As regards missed points, for mild glaucoma, missed points were 37.5, sensitivity was 77.8% and specificity was 52.6%; for moderate glaucoma, missed points were 33.5, sensitivity was 90% and specificity was 48% while for severe glaucoma, missed points were 23, sensitivity was 97% and specificity was 70%. AROC for eyes with mild glaucoma versus normal was 0.419 (95% CI: 0.343-0.495), moderate glaucoma versus normal was 0.705 (95% CI: 0.630-0.780) and severe glaucoma versus normal was 0.857 (95% CI: 0.806-0.908).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Suprathreshold perimetry using VFE is not suitable as a rapid screening tool for mass screening of glaucoma. VFE cannot be used as a substitute for HVFA in clinic because of its inability to detect early or moderate glaucoma.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.ijo_1847_19","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,15]],"date-time":"2020-12-15T08:27:00Z","timestamp":1608020820000},"page":"87-91","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Parul","family":"Ichhpujani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sahil","family":"Thakur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roopjit K","family":"Sahi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suresh","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R2-23-20240828","first-page":"22","article-title":"\u201cVisual Fields Easy\u201d: An iPad application as a simple tool for detecting visual field defects","volume":"41","author":"Santos","year":"2016","journal-title":"Philipp J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R3-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.9734\/OR\/2017\/34947","article-title":"Is the 'Visual Fields Easy' application a useful tool to identify visual field defects in patients who have suffered a stroke?","volume":"7","author":"Spofforth","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ophthalmol Res Int J"},{"key":"R4-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-9233.110619","article-title":"Teleglaucoma: Improving access and efficiency for glaucoma care","volume":"20","author":"Kassam","year":"2013","journal-title":"Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R5-23-20240828","first-page":"e218","article-title":"There's an app for that: A guide for healthcare practitioners and researchers on smartphone technology","volume":"7","author":"Nasser","year":"2015","journal-title":"Online J Public Health Inform"},{"key":"R6-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.08.007","article-title":"Performance of an iPad application to detect moderate and advanced visual field loss in Nepal","volume":"182","author":"Johnson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R7-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2015.10.053","article-title":"Primary open-angle glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern\u00ae guidelines","volume":"123","author":"Prum","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R9-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2016.03.006","article-title":"Management of advanced glaucoma: Characterization and monitoring","volume":"61","author":"de Moraes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R10-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.80.10.903","article-title":"The efficient use of perimetry for neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis","volume":"80","author":"Reitner","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R11-23-20240828","first-page":"3936","article-title":"Clinical validation of a tablet perimeter","volume":"57","author":"Vingrys","year":"2016","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R12-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.5.4.3","article-title":"Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter","volume":"5","author":"Vingrys","year":"2016","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"key":"R13-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.5.6.2","article-title":"A comparison of perimetric results from a tablet perimeter and humphrey field analyzer in glaucoma patients","volume":"5","author":"George Kong","year":"2016","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"key":"R14-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13082","article-title":"Performance of iPad-based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls","volume":"46","author":"Schulz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R15-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2014-305223","article-title":"The Spaeth\/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): Design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma","volume":"99","author":"Richman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R16-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1392","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-018-0099-y","article-title":"Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma","volume":"32","author":"Thakur","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eye (Lond"},{"key":"R17-23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0206081","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0206081","article-title":"A deep learning approach to automatic detection of early glaucoma from visual fields","volume":"13","author":"Kucur","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijo.IJO_1847_19","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T19:30:46Z","timestamp":1786735846000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijo.IJO_1847_19"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijo.ijo_1847_19","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-4738"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-4738","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}}}