{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T22:30:47Z","timestamp":1792794647606,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"7","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Anophthalmic sockets cause disfigurement that may result in emotional and social distress. The choice of procedure and implant is based upon the surgeon\u2019s experience. There remains no standardization of cosmetic result. We sought to identify quantifiable anatomical features and functional properties related to a successful cosmetic result in patients with ocular prosthesis and to determine correlations between self-reported and third-party assessment of cosmetic success.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This was a prospective observational study, which included 107 adult patients (50.1% female; age 53.08 \u00b1 18.64 years, range 18\u201389) with acquired anophthalmia following prosthesis fitting. Patients completed a self-assessment questionnaire on self-perception of body image and ocular properties. Three independent examiners assessed cosmetic score. Assessed variables included prosthesis movement, eyelid symmetry, prosthesis stability, and socket fullness.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The general cosmetic result was 8.1 \u00b1 2.19 (on a predetermined scale of 1\u201310) as perceived by the patients and 7.2 \u00b1 0.19 by the examiners. Interexaminer correlation was high for all variables (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.05). A good cosmetic result was correlated with prosthesis movement (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.02), eyelid symmetry (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.001), and prosthesis stability (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.01). Factors that correlated with a good cosmetic result on multivariate analysis were prosthesis movement (odds ratio [OR] 4.95,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.004), eyelid symmetry (OR 4.51,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.006), and socket fullness (OR 3.56,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.005). No correlation was observed between patients\u2019 perceptions of the overall cosmetic result and those of the examiners.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The cosmetic result of prosthesis use among anophthalmic patients is generally good, as perceived by both patients and examiners. Good eyelid position and symmetry, orbital fullness, and prosthesis motility were associated with a better cosmetic result.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.ijo_2682_20","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,25]],"date-time":"2021-06-25T14:43:02Z","timestamp":1624632182000},"page":"1876-1881","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Assessing the results of anophthalmic prostheses"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Yoav","family":"Vardizer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Ophthalmology Department, Bnei Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel"},{"name":"Ruth and Bruch Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel"},{"name":"Vardizer Ocularist Clinic, Haifa, Israel"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tamer","family":"Sobeh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ophthalmology Department, Bnei Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel"},{"name":"Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daphna Landau","family":"Prat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel"},{"name":"Children\u2019s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guy J Ben","family":"Simon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oren","family":"Tomkins-Netzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ruth and Bruch Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel"},{"name":"Ophthalmology Department, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"R2-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1097\/00055735-199410000-00016","article-title":"Congenital and acquired anophthalmia","volume":"5","author":"Handler","year":"1994","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R3-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136460","article-title":"Vision-related quality of life and appearance concerns are associated with anxiety and depression after eye enucleation:A cross-sectional study","volume":"10","author":"Ye","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"R4-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.12.036","article-title":"Health-related quality of life and emotional status of anophthalmic patients in Korea","volume":"149","author":"Ahn","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R5-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.3109\/01676830.2013.851251","article-title":"Appearance Research Collaboration (ARC)","volume":"33","author":"McBain","year":"2014","journal-title":"Orbit"},{"key":"R6-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-019-0398-y","article-title":"Living with an artificial eye-the emotional and psychosocial impact","volume":"33","author":"Saxby","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"R7-20260523","first-page":"Doc06","article-title":"Current concepts of ocular adnexal surgery","volume":"2","author":"Borrelli","year":"2013","journal-title":"GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW"},{"key":"R8-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1097\/IOP.0000000000001610","article-title":"Reconstruction of the orbit and anophthalmic socket using the dermis fat graft:A major review","volume":"36","author":"Jovanovic","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R9-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1097\/IOP.0000000000000217","article-title":"Anophthalmic syndrome:A review of management","volume":"30","author":"Shah","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R10-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-011-1902-7","article-title":"Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants","volume":"250","author":"Son","year":"2012","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R11-20260523","first-page":"CD010293","article-title":"Integrated versus non-integrated orbital implants for treating anophthalmic sockets","volume":"11","author":"Schellini","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R12-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2054","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(03)00857-1","article-title":"Orbital implants in enucleation surgery:A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology","volume":"110","author":"Custer","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R13-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.3109\/01676830.2016.1139593","article-title":"Orbital volume augmentation using expandable hydrogel implants in acquired anophthalmia and phthisis bulbi","volume":"35","author":"Kim","year":"2016","journal-title":"Orbit"},{"issue":"Spec No. 4","key":"R14-20260523","first-page":"23","article-title":"The anophthalmic socket-reconstruction options","author":"Schmitzer","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Med Life"},{"key":"R15-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1080\/01676830701555204","article-title":"Complications of orbital implants:A review of 542 patients who have undergone orbital implantation and 275 subsequent PEG placements","volume":"26","author":"Shoamanesh","year":"2007","journal-title":"Orbit"},{"key":"R16-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.iop.0000249432.18688.ee","article-title":"Porous implant exposure:Incidence, management, and morbidity","volume":"23","author":"Custer","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R17-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.09.037","article-title":"Prevention of exposure of porous orbital implants following enucleation","volume":"143","author":"Wang","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R18-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1616","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.125.12.1616","article-title":"Mechanisms and treatment of extruding intraconal implants:Socket aging and tissue restitution (the \u201cCactus Syndrome\u201c)","volume":"125","author":"Sagoo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R19-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1097\/00002341-199306000-00003","article-title":"Extrusion rate of silicone spherical anophthalmic socket implants","volume":"9","author":"Nunery","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R20-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1342","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(85)33865-4","article-title":"Management of complications following dermis-fat grafting for anophthalmic socket reconstruction","volume":"92","author":"Shore","year":"1985","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R21-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0b013e32832ed85b","article-title":"Surgical management of acquired socket contracture","volume":"20","author":"Tawfik","year":"2009","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R22-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.72.10.768","article-title":"Analysis of the factors involved in cosmetic failure following excision of the eye","volume":"72","author":"Smerdon","year":"1988","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"Pt 1","key":"R23-20260523","first-page":"90","article-title":"Orbital implants and post enucleation socket syndrome","volume":"102","author":"Tyers","year":"1982","journal-title":"Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K"},{"key":"R24-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1347","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(90)32411-9","article-title":"Computed tomography in the assessment of the postenucleation socket syndrome","volume":"97","author":"Smit","year":"1990","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R25-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1097\/IOP.0b013e31802dd428","article-title":"New measurement device and technique for assessing implant and prosthetic motility","volume":"23","author":"Raizada","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R26-20260523","first-page":"126","article-title":"Fitting the anophthalmic socket:Achieving cosmesis with comfort","volume":"8","author":"Johnson","year":"1990","journal-title":"Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"R27-20260523","first-page":"1","article-title":"Custom ocular prosthesis-related concerns:Patient feedback survey-based report vis-\u00e0-vis objective clinical grading scales","author":"Dave","year":"2020","journal-title":"Orbit"},{"key":"R28-20260523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2012.05.028","article-title":"Psychosocial impact on anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis","volume":"42","author":"Goiato","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijo.IJO_2682_20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T18:57:05Z","timestamp":1786647425000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ijo.IJO_2682_20"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,18]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijo.ijo_2682_20","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-4738","1998-3689"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-4738","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3689","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2020-08-17","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2021-02-10","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}