{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:30:09Z","timestamp":1786649409860,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare Hill-RBF 3.0 with Barrett Universal II (BU II), SRK\/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay 1 in predicting the accuracy of post-cataract surgery refractive outcomes in Indian eyes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this prospective, comparative, observational study, consecutive patients with uncomplicated age-related cataracts undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were included. The mean absolute errors (MAEs) and median absolute errors were used to determine the accuracy of predicted postoperative target refractions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 219 eyes of 173 patients were enrolled. Based on the axial lengths (AL), the patients were classified into: AL &lt;22 mm (short), 22\u201324.5 mm (normal), and &gt;24.5 mm (long). BU II exhibited the lowest MAE for normal ALs (0.2683 \u00b1 0.2790 D) as well as for the entire population (0.2764 \u00b1 0.2764 D). For the short ALs, Hill RBF 3.0 exhibited the lowest MAE (0.3268 \u00b1 0.3268 D), while for the long ALs, SRK\/T showed the lowest MAE (0.2823 \u00b1 0.2642 D). BU II exhibited the highest percentage of eyes of 57.5%, 95.4%, and 98.6% within \u00b10.25, \u00b10.75, and \u00b11.0 D of postoperative target refractions respectively, whereas Hill RBF 3.0 had the highest percentages of eyes (88.1%) within \u00b10.5 D of postoperative target refraction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Hill-RBF 3.0 exhibited the least MAE for patients with short ALs, while BU II showed the least MAE for normal ALs as well as for the entire population and SRK\/T for long ALs. This study is likely to aid surgeons in selecting the most appropriate IOL power formula, which thereby improves the refractive outcomes with utmost accuracy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.ijo_2693_23","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,20]],"date-time":"2024-05-20T11:01:33Z","timestamp":1716202893000},"page":"1261-1266","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Comparison of Hill-RBF 3.0 with Barrett Universal II, SRK\/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay 1 to predict the accuracy of post-cataract surgery refractive outcomes in Indian eyes"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"72","author":[{"given":"Tanie","family":"Natung","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), P.O. Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, Meghalaya, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ishita","family":"Pandey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), P.O. Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, Meghalaya, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benjamin","family":"Nongrum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), P.O. Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, Meghalaya, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ester K","family":"Sekhose","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), P.O. Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, Meghalaya, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260427","first-page":"58","article-title":"The evolution of cataract surgery","volume":"113","author":"Davis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Mo Med"},{"key":"R2-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_600_19","article-title":"Evaluation of Barrett universal II formula for intraocular lens power calculation in Asian Indian population","volume":"68","author":"Kuthirummal","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R3-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_2262_19","article-title":"Commentary: Barrett\u2019s Universal II formula: Time to change the old trends?","volume":"68","author":"Biswas","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R4-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.027","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulae","volume":"125","author":"Melles","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R5-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2017.0063","article-title":"Comparative efficacy of the new optical biometer on intraocular lens power calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster)","volume":"32","author":"Ha","year":"2018","journal-title":"Korean J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R6-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.07.021","article-title":"Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: comparison of 7 formulae","volume":"42","author":"Kane","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R7-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.06.029","article-title":"Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulae","volume":"42","author":"Cooke","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R8-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0241630.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0241630","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulae in cataract patients with steep corneal curvature","volume":"15","author":"Zhang","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"R9-20260427","first-page":"2536","article-title":"Accuracy of five intraocular lens formulae in eyes with trifocal lens implant","volume":"20","author":"M\u0103l\u0103escu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Exp Ther Med"},{"key":"R10-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672120902952","article-title":"Accuracy of the Hill\u2013radial basis function method and the Barrett Universal II formula","volume":"31","author":"Nemeth","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R11-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13034","article-title":"Comparison of Hill-radial basis function, Barrett Universal and current third generation formulae for the calculation of intraocular lens power during cataract surgery","volume":"46","author":"Roberts","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Experiment Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R12-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.18240\/ijo.2020.01.09","article-title":"Accuracy of biometric formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in a teaching hospital","volume":"13","author":"Tang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R13-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1097\/APO.0000000000000293","article-title":"Update on intraocular lens formulae and calculations","volume":"9","author":"Xia","year":"2020","journal-title":"Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)"},{"key":"R14-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x","article-title":"Calculation of intraocular lens power: A review","volume":"85","author":"Olsen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"R15-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.12.021","article-title":"Accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens power selection","volume":"43","author":"Kane","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R16-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.05.021","article-title":"Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulae for a quadrifocal intraocular lens","volume":"44","author":"Shajari","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R17-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.12478","article-title":"Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulae","volume":"43","author":"Reitblat","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R18-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4137","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-021-01966-z","article-title":"A comparative analysis of 12 intraocular lens power formulae","volume":"41","author":"Pereira","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R19-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.07.004","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculations in short eyes using 7 formulae","volume":"43","author":"G\u00f6kce","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R20-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.07.023","article-title":"Precision of intraocular lens power prediction in eyes shorter than 22 mm: An analysis of 6 formulae","volume":"44","author":"Shrivastava","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R21-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.01.018","article-title":"Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in Chinese eyes with axial myopia","volume":"45","author":"Liu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R22-20260427","first-page":"27","article-title":"Comparison of formula accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation based on measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography optical biometer","volume":"46","author":"Savini","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R23-20260427","first-page":"1373","article-title":"A comparison of SRK\/T formula with Hill RBF 2 and Barrett Universal II in the calculation of intraocular lens power","volume":"72","author":"Malik","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Pak Med Assoc"},{"key":"R24-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_943_20","article-title":"Comparison of three newer generation freely available intraocular lens power calculation formulae across all axial lengths","volume":"69","author":"Khatib","year":"2021","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R25-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20201123-01","article-title":"A comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in high myopia","volume":"37","author":"Bernardes","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R26-20260427","article-title":"Barrett Universal II Formula"},{"key":"R27-20260427","article-title":"Hill-RBF Calculator Version 3.0-IOL Power Calculations for Cataract Surgery"},{"key":"R28-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1085","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.08.010","article-title":"Statistical analysis for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy","volume":"160","author":"Aristodemou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R29-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.05.029","article-title":"Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy","volume":"160","author":"Hoffer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R30-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2370","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672120962030","article-title":"Comparison of the accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulae","volume":"31","author":"Carmona-Gonz\u00e1lez","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R31-20260427","first-page":"236","article-title":"The exactness of intraocular lens power calculation formulae for short eyes and correlation between method accuracy and eyeball axial length","volume":"78","author":"Stopyra","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cesk Slov Oftalmol"},{"key":"R32-20260427","first-page":"NC01","article-title":"A Comparative Study to Assess the Predictability of Different IOL Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes of Short and Long Axial Length","volume":"11","author":"Doshi","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"R33-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4137","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-021-01966-z","article-title":"A comparative analysis of 12 intraocular lens power formulas","volume":"41","author":"Pereira","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R34-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000702","article-title":"Evaluating the prediction accuracy of the Hill-RBF 3.0 formula using a heteroscedastic statistical method","volume":"48","author":"Tsessler","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R35-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13184","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in long eyes: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"46","author":"Wang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R36-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2010.07.008","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using the IOL Master in eyes with long axial length and a comparison of various formulae","volume":"118","author":"Bang","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R37-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.5301\/ejo.5000414","article-title":"Target refraction for best uncorrected distance and near vision in cataract surgery","volume":"24","author":"Schuster","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/IJO.IJO_2693_23","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T18:53:49Z","timestamp":1786647229000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/IJO.IJO_2693_23"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,20]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijo.ijo_2693_23","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-4738","1998-3689"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-4738","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3689","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-10-08","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-02-19","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}