{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T13:50:25Z","timestamp":1791985825635,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766966400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparability of two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, Anterion and IOLMaster 700. This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed articles published until October 1, 2023. Eligibility criteria included a comparative study design, absence of ocular diseases except cataract or refractive errors, same day measurements with both devices, and outcomes such as axial length (AL), mean keratometry, astigmatism vectors, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness, lens thickness (LT), corneal diameter, white-to-white (WTW), and intraocular lens (IOL) power for emmetropia. This systematic review incorporated 17 studies (2943 eyes). The mean difference of AL measurements obtained with Anterion and IOLMaster 700 was -0.01 [-0.09; 0.06]. Anterion provided a significantly larger ACD (0.10 mm [0.08-0.12 mm]) and LT (0.04 mm [0.01; 0.07]), while IOLMaster 700 had significantly larger WTW measurements (0.20 mm [-0.24; -0.16]). Corneal measurements tend to be flatter for Anterion, although no significant differences were found between devices. In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in WTW, LT, and ACD measurements between devices. AL measurements were comparable between biometers. Anterior mean and steep and flat keratometry tend to be higher with IOLMaster700. These differences may result in a higher IOL power for emmetropia when data are entered from Anterion measurements. Future studies will be needed to establish the influence of these differences on the refractive predictability of IOL power calculation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.ijo_3122_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T15:00:10Z","timestamp":1767020410000},"page":"23-28","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison meta-analysis of two swept-source optical coherence biometers"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"74","author":[{"given":"Daniel","family":"Romero","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Opthalmology, General University Hospital of Elche, Alacant, Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rub\u00e9n","family":"Toledano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Opthalmology, General University Hospital of Elche, Alacant, Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alicia","family":"C\u00e1rceles","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Opthalmology, General University Hospital of Elche, Alacant, Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carlos E","family":"Monera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Opthalmology, General University Hospital of Elche, Alacant, Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claudia P","family":"Tarazona","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Opthalmology, General University Hospital of Elche, Alacant, Alicante, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x","article-title":"Calculation of intraocular lens power: A review","volume":"85","author":"Olsen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"R2-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oftal.2022.04.007","article-title":"Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry","volume":"97","author":"Monera Lucas","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed)"},{"key":"R3-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000633","article-title":"Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer","volume":"47","author":"Fi\u015fu\u015f","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R4-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2271","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-022-05579-9","article-title":"Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers","volume":"260","author":"Cheng","year":"2022","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R5-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-022-05870-9","article-title":"Comparison of 2 modern swept-source optical biometers\u2014IOLMaster 700 and anterion","volume":"261","author":"Langenbucher","year":"2023","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R6-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R7-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R8-20260420","first-page":"7","article-title":"Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?","volume":"7","author":"Ma","year":"2020","journal-title":"Mil Med Res"},{"key":"R9-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R10-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R11-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics12030598","article-title":"Comparison study of the two biometers based on swept-source optical coherence tomography technology","volume":"12","author":"Dong","year":"2022","journal-title":"Diagnostics (Basel)"},{"key":"R12-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000373","article-title":"Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices","volume":"47","author":"Fi\u015fu\u015f","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R13-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20221221-03","article-title":"Accuracy of nine formulas to calculate the powers of an extended depth-of-focus IOL using two SS-OCT biometers","volume":"39","author":"Jeon","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R14-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000781","article-title":"Refractive prediction error in cataract surgery using an optical biometer equipped with anterior segment OCT","volume":"48","author":"Kato","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R15-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20230202-02","article-title":"Keratometry agreement between two swept-source OCT Devices in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes","volume":"39","author":"Mart\u00ednez-Albert","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R16-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000942","article-title":"Agreement between 2 SS-OCT biometry devices","volume":"48","author":"McLintock","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R17-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-021-01826-5","article-title":"Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices","volume":"21","author":"Oh","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R18-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1594","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_2433_21","article-title":"Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcome between ANTERION and IOL Master 700","volume":"70","author":"Panda","year":"2022","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R19-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000704","article-title":"Comparative analysis of 2 biometers using swept-source OCT technology","volume":"48","author":"Panthier","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R20-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000788","article-title":"Agreement of intraocular lens power calculation between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers","volume":"48","author":"Pfaeffli","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R21-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000494","article-title":"Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power","volume":"47","author":"Shetty","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R22-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000483","article-title":"Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer","volume":"47","author":"Ta\u00f1\u00e1-Rivero","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R23-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1219","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2021.2008908","article-title":"Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry","volume":"18","author":"Ta\u00f1\u00e1-Sanz","year":"2021","journal-title":"Expert Rev Med Devices"},{"key":"R24-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2021.1905518","article-title":"Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers","volume":"18","author":"Ta\u00f1\u00e1-Sanz","year":"2021","journal-title":"Expert Rev Med Devices"},{"key":"R25-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.08.003","article-title":"Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: III. Criteria for analyzing outcomes","volume":"43","author":"Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R26-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000370","article-title":"Review and recommendations for univariate statistical analysis of spherical equivalent prediction error for IOL power calculations","volume":"47","author":"Holladay","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R27-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000002799","article-title":"Intraobserver repeatability of tomographic, pachymetric, and anatomical measurements in healthy eyes using a new swept-source optical coherence topographer","volume":"41","author":"Escolano Serrano","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"R28-20260420","first-page":"1","article-title":"Comprehensive comparisons of ocular biometry: A network-based big data analysis","volume":"10","author":"Yu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eye Vis (Lond)"}],"container-title":["Indian Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/IJO.IJO_3122_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:01:00Z","timestamp":1786647660000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/IJO.IJO_3122_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijo.ijo_3122_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-4738","1998-3689"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-4738","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3689","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-12-31","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-11-03","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}