{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T20:25:30Z","timestamp":1787775930272,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,1]],"date-time":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735689600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of giomer-based injectable resin composite (GIRC) versus resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) in class V carious lesions over 18 months.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Participants and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Thirty participants with a cervical carious lesion were recruited and allotted to two groups (n = 15); Group 1 received GIRC (Beautifil Flow Plus X F03, Shofu Dental Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), and Group 2 received RMGI (Fuji II LC, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Materials were placed according to the manufactures\u2019 instructions. Restorations were evaluated using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria at baseline, after 6, 12, and 18 months. Data were statistically analyzed with the significance level set at (P \u2264 0.05) where categorical data as frequency, percentage, and intergroup comparisons were performed using the Chi-squared test and intragroup comparison using Cochran\u2019s Q-test.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Intergroup and intragroup comparisons showed no statistically significant difference between GIRC and RMGI at different time intervals for marginal adaptation, marginal staining, surface texture, secondary caries, retention, and postoperative sensitivity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>GIRC and RMGI showed similar clinical performance and are clinically acceptable after 18-month follow-up period.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jcde.jcde_722_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,13]],"date-time":"2025-01-13T10:00:12Z","timestamp":1736762412000},"page":"50-56","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Clinical evaluation of giomer-based injectable resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in class V carious lesions over 18 months: A randomized clinical trial"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Reham","family":"Hendam","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt"},{"name":"Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Modern University for Technology and Information, Cairo, Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rania","family":"Mosallam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dina","family":"Kamal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250114","first-page":"48","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of stress distribution in class V cavity restored with alkasite glass ionomer cement, nano filled resin modified glass ionomer cement & nano-hybrid composite using finite element analysis","volume":"2","author":"Khude","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Res Rep Dent"},{"key":"R2-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6591","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11216591","article-title":"Current strategies to control recurrent and residual caries with resin composite restorations: Operator- and material-related factors","volume":"11","author":"Elgezawi","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"R3-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tdj.2014.10.004","article-title":"Three-year clinical evaluation of two nano-hybrid giomer restorative composites","volume":"11","author":"Abdel-Karim","year":"2014","journal-title":"Tanta Dent J"},{"key":"R4-20250114","first-page":"99","article-title":"Optical properties and masking capacity of flowable giomers","volume":"94","author":"Rusnac","year":"2021","journal-title":"Med Pharm Rep"},{"key":"R5-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.4103\/JIOH.JIOH_297_19","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer with glass hybrid technology versus conventional high viscosity glass ionomer in class I cavities in patients with high caries risk: Randomized controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"El-Bialy","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Int Oral Health"},{"key":"R6-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1007\/s10266-020-00550-8","article-title":"Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial","volume":"109","author":"Koc Vural","year":"2021","journal-title":"Odontology"},{"key":"R7-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-0707.168805","article-title":"One year comparative clinical evaluation of EQUIA with resin-modified glass ionomer and a nanohybrid composite in noncarious cervical lesions","volume":"18","author":"Vaid","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Conserv Dent"},{"key":"R8-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.21608\/adjc.2023.177122.1203","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of new bioactive restorative material versus resin modified glass ionomer in restoration of cervical carious lesions: Randomized clinical trial","volume":"6","author":"El-Gaaly","year":"2024","journal-title":"Adv Dent J"},{"key":"R9-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-0707.218305","article-title":"One-year comparative evaluation of Ketac Nano with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and Giomer in noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial","volume":"20","author":"Priyadarshini","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Conserv Dent"},{"key":"R10-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.4103\/JCD.JCD_51_18","article-title":"Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up","volume":"21","author":"Hussainy","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Conserv Dent"},{"key":"R11-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12948","article-title":"Five-year clinical performance of two fluoride-releasing giomer resin materials in occlusal restorations","volume":"34","author":"Ozer","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Esthet Restor Dent"},{"key":"R12-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.3390\/dj11090225","article-title":"Retrospective clinical evaluation of RMGIC\/GIC class V restorations","volume":"11","author":"Santos","year":"2023","journal-title":"Dent J (Basel)"},{"key":"R13-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.55519\/JAMC-01-10780","article-title":"12 month's assessment of clinical efficacy of resin modified glass ionomer cement and flowable composites in restoration of non-carious cervical lesions, a randomized clinical trial","volume":"35","author":"Saghir","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad"},{"key":"R14-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-0707.87214","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V noncarious cervical lesions: An in vivo study","volume":"14","author":"Jyothi","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Conserv Dent"},{"key":"R15-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.4103\/1735-3327.363534","article-title":"Comparison of antibacterial activity and fluoride release in tooth-colored restorative materials: Resin-modified glass ionomer, zirconomer, giomer, and cention N","volume":"19","author":"Feiz","year":"2022","journal-title":"Dent Res J (Isfahan)"},{"key":"R16-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-4388.199235","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of secondary caries formation around light-cured fluoride-releasing restorative materials","volume":"35","author":"Naik","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent"},{"key":"R17-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-0707.173197","article-title":"Comparative study of fluoride released and recharged from conventional pit and fissure sealants versus surface prereacted glass ionomer technology","volume":"19","author":"Salmer\u00f3n-Vald\u00e9s","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Conserv Dent"},{"key":"R18-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e36","DOI":"10.5395\/rde.2020.45.e36","article-title":"Bonding of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin using universal adhesives","volume":"45","author":"Ugurlu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Restor Dent Endod"},{"key":"R19-20250114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e03969","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2020.e03969","article-title":"Glass ionomer cements compared with composite resin in restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"6","author":"Bezerra","year":"2020","journal-title":"Heliyon"}],"container-title":["Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/JCDE.JCDE_722_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T19:46:37Z","timestamp":1787773597000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/JCDE.JCDE_722_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jcde.jcde_722_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["2950-4716","2950-4708"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2950-4716","type":"print"},{"value":"2950-4708","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-10-07","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-12-10","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}