{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:18:34Z","timestamp":1787840314641,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A comparative study undertaken to measure the the marginal bone loss (MBL), implant survival rate, and prosthetic and biological complications among short implants (8 mm or shorter) and conventional implants (longer than 8 mm) in the posterior atrophic maxilla.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A search in three databases PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Cochrane was conducted. The present systematic review was registered with identification number CRD42020212805 at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Data extraction included the publication year, patients\u2019 number and number of implants, implant length and width, MBL, implant survival rate, and biological and mechanical complications. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 1.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the outcome variables. Comparisons for dichotomous variables, such as prosthetic and biological complications and implant survival rate, were done by applying the Mantel\u2013Haenszel method. In contrast, a comparison was made by applying the inverse variance method for continuous variables like MBL.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Initially, 618 reports were recognized from electronic database searches. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analyses regarding the MBL, implant survival rate, and prosthetic complications, while three were included for biological complications. In 5 years of follow-up, no evidence of difference could be found between conventional and short implants for survival rate (risk ratio [RR]: 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99\u201312.67;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.05;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 0%). We do not find any evidence of difference for MBL between short implants and conventional implants (mean difference: \u22120.29; 95% CI: \u22120.49 to \u22120.08;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.02;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 65%). Furthermore, no evidence of a difference exists between short and conventional implants for prosthetic complications (RR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.68\u20133.55;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.29;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 0%). The biological complications were seen less with short implants (RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24\u20130.93;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.03;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 0%).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The results suggest no significant difference among conventional and short implants regarding survival rate in the posterior atrophic maxilla. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that, for a 5-year period of follow-up, short implants are related to rarer biological complications and comparable MBL compared to conventional implants. Despite these promising findings, long-term studies with consistent study designs and clinical protocols are required to appraise the performance and durability of short implants.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jips.jips_226_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,15]],"date-time":"2024-10-15T03:00:20Z","timestamp":1728961220000},"page":"320-328","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Short implant versus conventional implant in the posterior atrophic maxilla: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Yogamaya","family":"Pradhan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha \u2018O\u2019 Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gunjan","family":"Srivastava","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha \u2018O\u2019 Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gopal Krishna","family":"Choudhury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha \u2018O\u2019 Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pradyumna Kumar","family":"Sahoo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha \u2018O\u2019 Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Subrat Kumar","family":"Padhiary","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha \u2018O\u2019 Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260427","first-page":"458","article-title":"Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single-tooth replacement: A 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study","volume":"27","author":"Rossi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R2-20260427","first-page":"1435","article-title":"Clinical performance of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: A systematic literature review","volume":"20","author":"Moldovan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"R3-20260427","first-page":"332","article-title":"Six-year follow-up assessment of prosthesis survival and oral health-related quality of life in individuals with partial edentulism treated with three types of prosthodontic rehabilitation","volume":"65","author":"Kurosaki","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"key":"R4-20260427","first-page":"499","article-title":"Short dental implants: An emerging concept in implant treatment","volume":"45","author":"Al-Hashedi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"key":"R5-20260427","first-page":"667","article-title":"A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient","volume":"38","author":"Telleman","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"key":"R6-20260427","first-page":"e64","article-title":"Maxillary sinus floor pneumatization and alveolar ridge resorption after tooth loss: A cross-sectional study","volume":"32","author":"Cavalcanti","year":"2018","journal-title":"Braz Oral Res"},{"key":"R7-20260427","first-page":"724","article-title":"A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: Anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications","volume":"54","author":"Danesh-Sani","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"R8-20260427","first-page":"26","article-title":"Bone regeneration in implant dentistry: Which are the factors affecting the clinical outcome?","volume":"93","author":"Donos","year":"2023","journal-title":"Periodontol 2000"},{"key":"R9-20260427","first-page":"2","article-title":"Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: Short implants versus long implants in augmented bone","volume":"47","author":"Thoma","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Periodontal Implant Sci"},{"key":"R10-20260427","first-page":"1085","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: Short implants (5 to 8 mm) versus longer implants (>8 mm) in vertically augmented sites","volume":"29","author":"Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"issue":"Suppl 16","key":"R11-20260427","first-page":"8","article-title":"Survival rates of short dental implants (\u22646 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R12-20260427","first-page":"31","article-title":"4 mm long versus longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"11","author":"Bolle","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R13-20260427","first-page":"375","article-title":"Short implants as an alternative to crestal sinus lift: A 1-year multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"8","author":"Felice","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R14-20260427","first-page":"257","article-title":"Short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants in atrophic maxillae: One-year post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial","volume":"8","author":"Esposito","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R15-20260427","first-page":"887","article-title":"Five-year survival of short single-tooth implants (6 mm): A randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"97","author":"Naenni","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"key":"R16-20260427","first-page":"283","article-title":"6 mm versus 10 mm-long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior jaws: A 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial","volume":"11","author":"Storelli","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R17-20260427","first-page":"1465","article-title":"Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5\u2013Year data","volume":"45","author":"Thoma","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"key":"R18-20260427","first-page":"127","article-title":"A 2-year follow-up study on standard length implants inserted into alveolar bone sites augmented with homografts","volume":"10","author":"Franco","year":"2008","journal-title":"Stomatologija"},{"key":"R19-20260427","first-page":"8","article-title":"Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"47","author":"Lemos","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"R20-20260427","first-page":"530","article-title":"Short versus standard implants for single-crown restorations in the posterior region: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"124","author":"Sadowsky","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"R20-20260427","first-page":"541","volume":"128","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"R21-20260427","first-page":"25","article-title":"Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws","volume":"12","author":"Felice","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Oral Implantol (Berl)"},{"key":"R22-20260427","first-page":"39","article-title":"Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5\u00d75 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Esposito","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Oral Implantol (Berl)"},{"key":"R23-20260427","first-page":"57","article-title":"Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6-mm-long 4-mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year post-loading results from a within-person randomised controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Felice","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Oral Implantol (Berl)"},{"key":"R24-20260427","first-page":"315","article-title":"Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants: A 5-year randomised controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Gulj\u00e9","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Oral Implantol (Berl)"},{"key":"R25-20260427","article-title":"Library Guides: Zotero for Citation Management: Using References","author":"Coffey"},{"key":"R26-20260427","first-page":"359","article-title":"Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial","volume":"6","author":"Pistilli","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R27-20260427","first-page":"343","article-title":"Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5\u00d75 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial","volume":"6","author":"Pistilli","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"R28-20260427","first-page":"e465","article-title":"Single restorations in the resorbed posterior mandible supported by 6-mm implants: A 1-year prospective case series study","volume":"17","author":"Gulj\u00e9","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"R29-20260427","first-page":"5645","article-title":"Short implants and conventional implants in the residual maxillary alveolar ridge: A 36-month follow-up observation","volume":"24","author":"Hadzik","year":"2018","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"key":"R30-20260427","first-page":"438","article-title":"Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial","volume":"44","author":"Pohl","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"key":"R31-20260427","first-page":"1097","article-title":"Short (6-mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (\u226510-mm) dental implants: A randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up","volume":"28","author":"Bechara","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R32-20260427","first-page":"1242","article-title":"Evaluation of single-tooth implants in the second molar region: A 5-year life-table analysis of a retrospective study","volume":"81","author":"Koo","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"R33-20260427","first-page":"894","article-title":"Marginal bone level and survival of short and standard-length implants after 3 years: An open multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"29","author":"Zadeh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R34-20260427","first-page":"16","article-title":"Five-year survival distributions of short-length (10 mm or less) machined-surfaced and osseotite implants","volume":"6","author":"Feldman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"R35-20260427","first-page":"414","article-title":"Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure","volume":"68","author":"Olate","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"R36-20260427","first-page":"102","article-title":"Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss","volume":"17","author":"Anitua","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"R37-20260427","first-page":"9","article-title":"Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three-year results of a randomized clinical study","volume":"20","author":"Taschieri","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"R38-20260427","first-page":"15","article-title":"Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: A retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up","volume":"9","author":"Mal\u00f3","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"R39-20260427","first-page":"1179","article-title":"Rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla using splinted short implants or sinus augmentation with standard-length implants: A retrospective cohort study","volume":"31","author":"Pieri","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"R40-20260427","first-page":"457","article-title":"Short dental implants: What works and what doesn\u2019t? A literature interpretation","volume":"33","author":"Deporter","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"R41-20260427","first-page":"1","article-title":"Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: A systematic review","volume":"19","author":"Javed","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"R42-20260427","first-page":"640","article-title":"Impact of local predisposing\/precipitating factors and systemic drivers on peri-implant diseases","volume":"25","author":"Monje","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jips.jips_226_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:20:09Z","timestamp":1787836809000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jips.jips_226_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jips.jips_226_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0972-4052","1998-4057"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0972-4052","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-4057","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-06-25","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-09-21","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}