{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:38:16Z","timestamp":1786649896592,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare infra-sinus residual ridge height measured preoperatively using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) with intraoperative measurements recorded during indirect sinus lift osteotomy using the Crestal Approach Sinus (CAS) kit, and to evaluate the reliability of CBCT in posterior maxillary implant planning.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Settings and Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This prospective observational clinical study was conducted on participants requiring implant rehabilitation in the posterior maxilla.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Fifty participants indicated for implant placement in the posterior maxilla were included. Infra-sinus residual ridge height was measured preoperatively on CBCT scans using Planmeca Romexis\u00ae software. Intraoperative measurements were recorded during indirect sinus lift osteotomy using a depth gauge from the CAS kit. Preoperative CBCT measurements were compared with intraoperative findings.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Statistical Analysis Used:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi version 2.3.28 software. The Shapiro\u2013Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of numerical variables. As the data were non-normally distributed, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine the significance of differences between CBCT and intraoperative measurements. A\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      -value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The mean infra-sinus residual ridge height measured on CBCT was 4.66 \u00b1 0.798 mm, while the mean intraoperative measurement was 6.50 \u00b1 1.074 mm. The difference between the two measurement methods was statistically significant (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001), indicating a consistent underestimation of ridge height by CBCT.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>CBCT consistently underestimates infra-sinus residual ridge height by approximately 1.86 mm when compared with intraoperative measurements. Although CBCT remains indispensable for pre-surgical planning, reliance on CBCT alone may be insufficient for sinus lift procedures, particularly in borderline cases. A dual-modality approach combining CBCT evaluation with intraoperative verification improves accuracy and safety, thereby supporting evidence-based and precise clinical decision-making.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jips.jips_393_25","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T06:00:26Z","timestamp":1767247226000},"page":"102-110","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative evaluation of infrasinus residual ridge height in cone-beam computed tomography and on-site measurements during indirect sinus lift osteotomy: An observational study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Mallikarjuna","family":"Ragher","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya University, Deralakatte, Karnataka, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sanath Kumar","family":"Shetty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya University, Deralakatte, Karnataka, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rajesh","family":"Shetty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya University, Deralakatte, Karnataka, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Savitha","family":"Dandekeri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya University, Deralakatte, Karnataka, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nafiya Abdul","family":"Aziz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya University, Deralakatte, Karnataka, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Sunaina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya University, Deralakatte, Karnataka, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13619","article-title":"Alveolar ridge preservation and early implant placement at maxillary central incisor sites: A prospective case series study","volume":"31","author":"Chen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R2-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1758736012456543","DOI":"10.1177\/1758736012456543","article-title":"Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology","volume":"3","author":"Hansson","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Dent Biomech"},{"key":"R3-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.4103\/jisp.jisp_236_18","article-title":"Maxillary sinus augmentation","volume":"22","author":"Bathla","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Indian Soc Periodontol"},{"key":"R4-20260420","first-page":"152","article-title":"A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique","volume":"15","author":"Summers","year":"1994","journal-title":"Compendium"},{"key":"R5-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-018-0523-5","article-title":"Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: Recommendations for clinical use","volume":"18","author":"Jacobs","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"R6-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20140238","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20140238","article-title":"CBCT-based bone quality assessment: Are Hounsfield units applicable?","volume":"44","author":"Pauwels","year":"2015","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"R7-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-12-00083","article-title":"The incidence of maxillary sinus membrane perforation during endoscopically assessed crestal sinus floor elevation: A pilot study","volume":"38","author":"Garbacea","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R8-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1590\/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oar","article-title":"Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs","volume":"19","author":"Flores-Mir","year":"2014","journal-title":"Dental Press J Orthod"},{"key":"R10-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.4103\/jiaomr.jiaomr_346_21","article-title":"Evaluation of the accuracy of measurements made at probable implant site using cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective in vivo study","volume":"34","author":"Sarfaraz","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol"},{"key":"R11-20260420","first-page":"333","article-title":"Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography in comparison with clinical measurements","volume":"13","author":"Rokn","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Dent (Tehran)"},{"issue":"Suppl 16","key":"R12-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13142","article-title":"Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review","volume":"29","author":"Fokas","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R13-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0b013e31824bf93c","article-title":"Accuracy of linear measurements in cone-beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes","volume":"21","author":"Torres","year":"2012","journal-title":"Implant Dent"},{"key":"R14-20260420","first-page":"271","article-title":"Accuracy and reliability of linear measurements using tangential projection and cone-beam computed tomography","volume":"12","author":"Sheikhi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Dent Res J (Isfahan)"},{"key":"R15-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1287","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.4073","article-title":"Accuracy of linear measurements using cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning","volume":"30","author":"Luangchana","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"R16-20260420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/s11282-015-0225-5","article-title":"Quantification of circumferential bone level and extraction socket dimensions using different imaging and estimation methods: a comparative study","volume":"32","author":"Alkan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Oral Radiol"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jips.jips_393_25","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T18:59:38Z","timestamp":1786647578000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jips.jips_393_25"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jips.jips_393_25","relation":{},"ISSN":["0972-4052","1998-4057"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0972-4052","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-4057","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-08-22","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-12-02","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}