{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T16:35:18Z","timestamp":1787070918274,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,1]],"date-time":"2025-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1743465600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Cleft lip and palate (CLP), affecting 1 in 700\u20131000 live births, cause feeding difficulties in neonates due to oronasal communication, requiring feeding plates. Traditional impression methods risk material aspiration and distortion.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study aimed to assess the efficacy of digital impressions for recording CLP anatomical details in neonates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting and Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Conducted as a single-center, open, parallel-arm, single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial over 18 months, the study involved healthy, nonsyndromic neonates aged 1\u201315 days with Veau\u2019s class III CLP.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 32 neonates were randomly allocated to either the tray impression group or the DIT group. The accuracy of the impression and adaptation of the feeding plate is evaluated.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Statistical Analysis:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The independent\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test was used to compare the accuracy of anatomical details recorded by digital and tray impression techniques in CLP neonates. Intragroup and intergroup comparisons of sulcus, ridge, and palate deviation on the right and left sides were analyzed using an independent\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test based on software superimposition of the feeding plate and maxillary cleft arch.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The anteroposterior length of the cleft and sulcus depth middle region of CLP exhibited significant differences (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.001 and\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.032, respectively) between the groups. Furthermore, Group 1 displayed notably higher values in the sulcus, ridge, and palate point deviation measurements during software superimposition.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Surface detailing, impression accuracy, and feeding plate adaption were all shown to be outstanding with DIT, in addition to its benefits as the safest and simplest impression technique.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jisppd.jisppd_533_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,30]],"date-time":"2025-06-30T09:00:42Z","timestamp":1751274042000},"page":"244-251","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative evaluation of digital and tray impression technique as a method of recording anatomical details of cleft lip and palate in neonates \u2013 A randomized controlled clinical trial"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Karthika","family":"Krishnakumar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ritesh","family":"Kalaskar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2621","DOI":"10.4103\/jfmpc.jfmpc_472_20","article-title":"Cleft of lip and palate:A review","volume":"9","author":"Vyas","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Family Med Prim Care"},{"key":"R2-20250701","first-page":"1","article-title":"Cleft lip and palate:Etiology, epidemiology, prevention and intervention strategies","volume":"4","author":"Allan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Anat Physiol"},{"key":"R3-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.5125\/jkaoms.2021.47.4.257","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of nasal and alveolar changes in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using intraoral and extraoral nasoalveolar molding techniques:Randomized controlled trial","volume":"47","author":"Kalaskar","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"R4-20250701","first-page":"279","article-title":"Prevalence and evaluation of environmental risk factors associated with cleft lip and palate in a central Indian population","volume":"35","author":"Kalaskar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"R5-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"846","DOI":"10.1002\/ca.22892","article-title":"Aprospective longitudinal study of postnatal dentoalveolar and palatal growth:The anatomical basis for CAD\/CAM-assisted production of cleft-lip-palate feeding plates","volume":"30","author":"Bauer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Anat"},{"key":"R6-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e43312","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0043312","article-title":"Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology","volume":"7","author":"van der Meer","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"R7-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1597\/15-036","article-title":"Intraoral 3D scanning or dental impressions for the assessment of dental arch relationships in cleft care:Which is superior?","volume":"53","author":"Chalmers","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cleft Palate Craniofac J"},{"key":"R8-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.3390\/dj7040111","article-title":"Evaluation of a digital protocol for pre-surgical orthopedic treatment of cleft lip and palate in newborn patients:A pilot study","volume":"7","author":"Dalessandri","year":"2019","journal-title":"Dent J (Basel)"},{"key":"R9-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.5125\/jkaoms.2021.47.2.82","article-title":"Effectiveness of the novel impression tray \u201ccleftray\u201dfor infants with cleft lip and palate:A randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"47","author":"Kalaskar","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"R10-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S216","DOI":"10.4103\/0975-7406.155913","article-title":"Rapid prototyping and stereolithography in dentistry","volume":"7","author":"Nayar","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Pharm Bioallied Sci"},{"key":"R11-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jormas.2021.05.008","article-title":"Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip:A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"123","author":"Salari","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"R12-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.74.4.360","article-title":"Management of cleft lip and palate","volume":"74","author":"Habel","year":"1996","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child"},{"key":"R13-20250701","first-page":"563","article-title":"Prevalence of cleft lip and cleft palate among patients visiting a dental institution","volume":"17","author":"Zaaba","year":"2020","journal-title":"PalArch J Archaeol Egypt Egyptol"},{"key":"R14-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1007\/s12663-010-0132-6","article-title":"Epidemiological analysis of cleft lip and\/or palate by cleft pattern","volume":"9","author":"Nagase","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Maxillofac Oral Surg"},{"key":"R15-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.5152\/TurkJOrthod.2019.18094","article-title":"The prevalence of cleft lip and palate patients:A single-center experience for 17 years","volume":"32","author":"Y\u0131lmaz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Turk J Orthod"},{"key":"R16-20250701","first-page":"123","article-title":"Role of feeding plate in cleft palate:Case report and review of literature","volume":"12","author":"Rathee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Internet J Otorhinolaryngol"},{"key":"R17-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1590\/0103-6440202104148","article-title":"Innovative method to assess maxillary arch morphology in oral cleft:3d-3d superimposition technique","volume":"32","author":"Ambrosio","year":"2021","journal-title":"Braz Dent J"},{"key":"R18-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1111\/cga.12499","article-title":"Comparison of conventional impression making and intraoral scanning for the study of unilateral cleft lip and palate","volume":"63","author":"Okazaki","year":"2023","journal-title":"Congenit Anom (Kyoto)"},{"key":"R19-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2022.08.015","article-title":"Digital impressions from newborns to preschoolers with cleft lip and palate:A two-centers experience","volume":"75","author":"Benitez","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"key":"R20-20250701","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0179188","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0179188","article-title":"In vivo evaluation of inter-operator reproducibility of digital dental and conventional impression techniques","volume":"12","author":"Kamimura","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jisppd.jisppd_533_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:38:53Z","timestamp":1787067533000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jisppd.jisppd_533_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jisppd.jisppd_533_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-4388","1998-3905"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-4388","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3905","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-12-31","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-04-09","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}