{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T20:29:17Z","timestamp":1786739357079,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Ideal bilio-pancreatic limb (BPL) length is a highly debatable issue in one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Whether to use a tailored BPL or a fixed-length BPL needs to be answered.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      One-hundred and one patients who have undergone tailored OAGB based on basal metabolic index (BMI) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were analysed. Sixty-three patients had BPL of 150 cm and 38 patients had BPL of 180 cm. Mean pre-operative BMI of BPL 150 and 180 cm groups were 39.73 and 51.92 kg\/m\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      , respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There was a significant drop in mean total body weight, BMI and excess body weight of both the groups at 1 year which persisted for 5 years post-operatively. The mean BMI of BPL 150 and BPL 180 cm group at 5 years was 29.17 and 32.88 kg\/m\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      , respectively. Although mean percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) and percentage of excess BMI loss in the two groups was similar, the mean percentage total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly higher for the BPL 180 cm group. There was no difference between the two groups in the number of patients who had &gt;50% EWL and &gt;20% TWL. At 5 years of follow-up, the mean serum iron level was significantly low in BPL 180 cm group. There was a significant drop in mean haemoglobin A1c values postoperatively, with no difference between the two groups.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Tailored BPL of 150 and 180 cm do not show any difference in the number of patients achieving &gt;50% EWL or &gt;20% TWL and so increasing limb length may not increase the number of good responders for weight loss. Although the resolution of T2DM and improvement of QoL score do not change significantly with increase in BPL length, mean serum iron levels may be lower with longer BPL.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jmas.jmas_117_21","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,16]],"date-time":"2021-07-16T11:37:40Z","timestamp":1626435460000},"page":"264-272","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass \u2013 Subgroup analysis of a randomised control trial based on bilio-pancreatic limb length with long-term results of 101 patients"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Mayank","family":"Jain","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Om","family":"Tantia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ghanshyam","family":"Goyal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tamonas","family":"Chaudhuri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shashi","family":"Khanna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anshuman","family":"Poddar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kajari","family":"Majumdar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sonam","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2956","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-018-3382-x","article-title":"One anastomosis (Mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: A systematic review of 12,807 patients","volume":"28","author":"Parmar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R2-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1188","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-018-3182-3","article-title":"Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement","volume":"28","author":"De Luca","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R3-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2222","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-017-2663-0","article-title":"Understanding objections to one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass: A survey of 417 surgeons not performing this procedure","volume":"27","author":"Mahawar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R4-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3685","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-020-04687-x","article-title":"Biliopancreatic limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: Which is the best?","volume":"30","author":"Pizza","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R5-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3062","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04019-8","article-title":"One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass with tailored biliopancreatic limb length formula relative to small bowel length: Preliminary results","volume":"29","author":"Komaei","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R6-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-017-2831-2","article-title":"Perioperative practices concerning one anastomosis (Mini) gastric bypass: A survey of 210 surgeons","volume":"28","author":"Mahawar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R7-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"948","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-016-2403-x","article-title":"LSG vs OAGB-1 year follow-up data \u2013 A randomized control trial","volume":"27","author":"Seetharamaiah","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R8-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2820","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-018-3255-3","article-title":"LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 year follow-up data: A randomised control trial","volume":"28","author":"Shivakumar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R9-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-020-05119-6","article-title":"LSG vs MGB-OAGB: 5-Year follow-up data and comparative outcome of the two procedures over long term-results of a randomised control trial","volume":"31","author":"Jain","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R10-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1304","DOI":"10.1381\/096089205774512663","article-title":"Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: Six-year study in 2,410 patients","volume":"15","author":"Rutledge","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R11-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2956","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-017-2726-2","article-title":"Complications following the Mini\/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB\/OAGB): A multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 Years) follow-up","volume":"27","author":"Musella","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R12-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-016-2428-1","article-title":"Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: Technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients","volume":"27","author":"Carbajo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R13-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-015-1773-9","article-title":"Micronutrient deficiencies in morbidly obese women prior to bariatric surgery","volume":"26","author":"S\u00e1nchez","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R14-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1002\/oby.20461","article-title":"Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery","volume":"21","author":"Mechanick","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obesity (Silver Spring"},{"key":"R15-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1381\/096089298765554043","article-title":"Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS)","volume":"8","author":"Oria","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R16-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2008.10.004","article-title":"Updated bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS)","volume":"5","author":"Oria","year":"2009","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"key":"R17-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1381\/096089201321336584","article-title":"The mini-gastric bypass: Experience with the first 1,274 cases","volume":"11","author":"Rutledge","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R18-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-020-00743-4","article-title":"Laparoscopic mini\/one anastomosis gastric bypass: Anatomic features, imaging, efficacy and postoperative complications","volume":"72","author":"Scavone","year":"2020","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"key":"R19-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-012-0618-z","article-title":"One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: Short- and long-term outcome","volume":"22","author":"Noun","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R20-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-018-3516-1","article-title":"Short- and mid-term outcomes of 527 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass\/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB\/MGB) operations: Retrospective study","volume":"29","author":"Hussain","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R21-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.4103\/jmas.JMAS_198_16","article-title":"Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass","volume":"14","author":"Mahawar","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Minim Access Surg"},{"key":"R22-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3493","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04022-z","article-title":"Defining weight loss after bariatric surgery: A call for standardization","volume":"29","author":"Grover","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R23-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-020-05093-z","article-title":"One anastomosis gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Long-term results and recurrence","volume":"31","author":"Soong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R24-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1952","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-017-2623-8","article-title":"Outcomes of omega loop gastric bypass, 6-years experience of 1520 cases","volume":"27","author":"Taha","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R25-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4206","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-020-04775-y","article-title":"One anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm: Weight Loss, nutritional outcomes, endoscopic results, and quality of life at 8-year follow-up","volume":"30","author":"Liagre","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R26-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04287-4","article-title":"Long-term outcomes after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in morbidly obese patients","volume":"30","author":"Neuberg","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R27-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1258","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04359-5","article-title":"One anastomosis gastric bypass performed with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb delivers weight loss outcomes similar to those with a 200-cm biliopancreatic limb at 18 -24 months","volume":"30","author":"Boyle","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R28-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3528","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-020-04681-3","article-title":"Comparing the efficacy and safety of roux-en-Y gastric bypass with one-anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 200 or 160 cm: 1-year results of the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS)","volume":"30","author":"Khalaj","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R29-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2040","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-014-1288-9","article-title":"Changes of body composition in patients with BMI 23-50 after tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass (BAGUA): Influence of diabetes and metabolic syndrome","volume":"24","author":"Garciacaballero","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R30-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04270-z","article-title":"Weight loss after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Patient-related perioperative predictive factors","volume":"30","author":"Ansar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R31-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1430","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-014-1220-3","article-title":"A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses-first study from Indian subcontinent","volume":"24","author":"Kular","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R32-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2019.12.012","article-title":"Impact of limb length on nutritional status in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 3-year results","volume":"16","author":"Jedamzik","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Obes Relat Dis"},{"key":"R33-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1230","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-019-04250-3","article-title":"One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) \u2013 A mid-term cohort study with 612 patients","volume":"30","author":"Rheinwalt","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R34-18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2164","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-017-2736-0","article-title":"A biliopancreatic limb of>150 cm with OAGB\/MGB Is Ill-advised","volume":"27","author":"Mahawar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obes Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimal Access Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmas.JMAS_117_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T19:28:19Z","timestamp":1786735699000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmas.JMAS_117_21"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_117_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["0972-9941"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0972-9941","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]}}}