{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T20:39:36Z","timestamp":1786653576696,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751328000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for treating gall bladder stones (GBS), its safety in elderly patients is still questioned. This study aimed to assess the outcome of LC in patients 70 and older compared to younger patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The medical records of 548 patients undergoing LC were evaluated retrospectively. Patients\u2019 demographics and post-operative complications were recorded. Furthermore, patients were divided according to the CEPOD into emergency and elective patients, and complications were recorded according to Clavien\u2013Dindo (CD) classifications. Data analysis was performed with SPSS software version 27.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Patients were divided into the elderly patients group (\u226570 years of age,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 185) and the young patients group (&lt;70 years of age,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 363). The \u226570-year-old group showed a significantly higher number of patients who required emergency admission with GBS symptoms (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.001), emergency LC (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.01) and conversion to open (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.02). The two groups showed comparable post-operative complications: bile leak (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.26), collection (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.11) and re-operation (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.60), post-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 1.0), GBS pancreatitis (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.33) and death (0.30). CD I\u2013II complications were higher in the \u2265 70-year-old group compared to the &lt;70-year-old group in elective (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.01) and emergency (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.03) LC. However, CD \u22653 complications were higher in the \u226570-year-old group than the &lt;70-year-old group in the emergency LC (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.01) and comparable in the elective LC (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.12).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>LC is safe and efficient in elderly patients. Elective LC should be expedited in elderly patients to avoid emergency admissions and emergency LC, which are associated with higher complication rates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jmas.jmas_138_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,14]],"date-time":"2025-07-14T06:00:08Z","timestamp":1752472808000},"page":"265-269","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: Avoid or expedite? - A comparative cohort study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Maria","family":"Mondragon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ali Yasen","family":"Mohamedahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shafquat","family":"Zaman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, The Dudley Group NHS Trust, Dudley, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ja\u2019quay","family":"Farquharson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Usman","family":"Raja","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arhum","family":"Ijaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deepak","family":"Singh-Ranger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1159\/000455241","article-title":"Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly population: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"34","author":"Loozen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"key":"R2-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1080\/00365520310008502","article-title":"Pain and quality of life in patients with symptomatic, non-complicated gallbladder stones: Results of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"39","author":"Vetrhus","year":"2004","journal-title":"Scand J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R3-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9886","article-title":"Meta-analysis comparing early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis","volume":"102","author":"Wu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"R4-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2015.04.083","article-title":"Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Coccolini","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"R5-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5989","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-023-10048-3","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in super elderly (> 90 years of age): Safety and outcomes","volume":"37","author":"Ram\u00edrez-Giraldo","year":"2023","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R8-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","article-title":"Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey","volume":"240","author":"Dindo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"R9-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-020-00336-x","article-title":"2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis","volume":"15","author":"Pisano","year":"2020","journal-title":"World J Emerg Surg"},{"key":"R10-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4727","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07805-z","article-title":"Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"34","author":"Kamarajah","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R11-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1186\/s12877-016-0329-8","article-title":"Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: A systematic review","volume":"16","author":"Lin","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Geriatr"},{"key":"R12-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1623","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-021-01091-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumours in the elderly: Systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"73","author":"Mohamedahmed","year":"2021","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"key":"R13-20250714","first-page":"97","article-title":"Gender as a predictive factor in cholecystectomy \u2013Is it true or false?","volume":"60","author":"Osuch","year":"2020","journal-title":"Folia Med Cracov"},{"key":"R14-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1177\/0003134821989044","article-title":"Sex disparities in the presentation of gallbladder disease","volume":"88","author":"Bailey","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"R15-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1186\/s12877-019-1189-9","article-title":"Understanding the care and support needs of older people: A scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF)","volume":"19","author":"Abdi","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Geriatr"},{"key":"R16-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1007\/s10353-018-0551-z","article-title":"Experiences with the standardized classification of surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo) in general surgery patients","volume":"50","author":"Bolliger","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur Surg"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"R17-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.08.385","article-title":"Role and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly","volume":"12","author":"Agrusa","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"R18-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.44.2.90","article-title":"Variations in lengths of stay and rates of day case surgery: Implications for the efficiency of surgical management","volume":"44","author":"Morgan","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"R19-20250714","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.15537\/smj.2015.1.9738","article-title":"Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"36","author":"Al-Qahtani","year":"2015","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimal Access Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_138_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:39:30Z","timestamp":1786649970000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_138_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_138_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0972-9941","1998-3921"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0972-9941","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3921","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-05-15","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-03-20","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}