{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,28]],"date-time":"2026-08-28T15:27:05Z","timestamp":1787930825597,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Robotic pelvic surgeries offer distinct advantages regarding intraoperative manoeuvrability and post-operative outcomes. However, the steep Trendelenburg position required for these procedures presents significant physiological challenges. The optimal angle that minimises complications while maintaining surgical efficacy remains undefined.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A prospective, randomised comparative study was conducted involving 100 patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 50) and robotic hysterectomy (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 50). The primary objective was to assess variations in intraocular pressure (IOP) and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) at varying degrees of tilt. The secondary objective was to evaluate haemodynamic stability and surgical feasibility. Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either a reduced or standard tilt group for their respective procedures.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Haemodynamic parameters, including diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure and arterial DBP, were significantly lower in the 15\u00b0 and 20\u00b0 tilt groups. ONSD measurements were marginally higher in prostatectomy patients (4.9 mm) versus hysterectomy patients (4.8 mm) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.075). Significant variations in IOP, intracranial pressure and ONSD were observed between hysterectomy groups (15\u00b0 and 20\u00b0) and prostatectomy groups (20\u00b0 and 25\u00b0), with peak parameters typically occurring mid-surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated superior sensitivity of IOP over ONSD for distinguishing conditions during hysterectomy. Minimal surgical difficulty was achieved at 20\u00b0 tilt.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>While traditional practices favour angles between 30\u00b0 and 45\u00b0, this study demonstrates that lower angles provide safer alternatives without compromising surgical visualisation. Rather than adhering to a universal rigid angle, we recommend an individualised approach: initiating procedures at moderate tilts (15\u00b0 for hysterectomy and 20\u00b0 for prostatectomy) and increasing the angle only if patient-specific anatomical constraints dictate the need for greater exposure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jmas.jmas_295_26","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,28]],"date-time":"2026-08-28T15:01:53Z","timestamp":1787929313000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Optimal tilt: The search for the perfect angle for robot-assisted pelvic surgeries"],"prefix":"10.4103","author":[{"given":"Girish","family":"Sharma","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shailesh Chandra","family":"Sahay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pawan","family":"Kesarwani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1213\/ane.0b013e3181a9098f","article-title":"The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy","volume":"109","author":"Awad","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R2-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeq018","article-title":"Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy","volume":"104","author":"Kalmar","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R3-20260828","first-page":"115","article-title":"Implications for postoperative visual loss: Steep trendelenburg position and effects on intraocular pressure","volume":"79","author":"Molloy","year":"2011","journal-title":"AANA J"},{"key":"R4-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.24920\/004231","article-title":"Advances in the clinical application of trendelenburg position","volume":"38","author":"Qiu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Chin Med Sci J"},{"key":"R5-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000001584","article-title":"Change in Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure Due to Trendelenburg Positioning","volume":"97","author":"Ristin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"R6-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-022-02547-z","article-title":"Effect of different surgical positions on intraocular pressure: a cross-sectional study","volume":"22","author":"Sun","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R7-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2013.3024","article-title":"Effect of abdominal insufflation for laparoscopy on intracranial pressure","volume":"149","author":"Kamine","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"R8-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1179\/1743132813Y.0000000308","article-title":"Improved diagnostic value of a TCD-based non-invasive ICP measurement method compared with the sonographic ONSD method for detecting elevated intracranial pressure","volume":"36","author":"Ragauskas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Neurol Res"},{"key":"R9-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2014.0019","article-title":"Increase in intracranial pressure during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with steep trendelenburg positioning proven by ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter","volume":"28","author":"Kim","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"R10-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04203.x","article-title":"Hemodynamic changes due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"39","author":"Hirvonen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R11-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-017-0333-3","article-title":"Changes in intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in steep 45\u00b0 Trendelenburg position","volume":"17","author":"Blecha","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R12-20260828","first-page":"178","article-title":"Anesthetic challenges in robotic-assisted urologic surgery","volume":"15","author":"Hsu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Rev Urol"},{"key":"R13-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aew356","article-title":"Effects of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg Position on intracranial pressure assessed using different non-invasive Methods","volume":"117","author":"Robba","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R14-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.JOACP_96_20","article-title":"Quantitative rise in intraocular pressure in patients undergoing robotic surgery in steep Trendelenburg position: A prospective observational study","volume":"36","author":"Goel","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R15-20260828","article-title":"The Role of Trendelenburg Positioning for the Acute Symptomatic Management of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension","volume":"16","author":"Zhang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Neurohospitalist"},{"key":"R16-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2844","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11102844","article-title":"The impact of steep Trendelenburg position on Intraocular pressure","volume":"11","author":"Ripa","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"R17-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.03.019","article-title":"Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery","volume":"19","author":"Ghomi","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"R18-20260828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2012.03.003","article-title":"Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: A review of the Literature","volume":"24","author":"Awad","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimal Access Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_295_26","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,28]],"date-time":"2026-08-28T15:01:55Z","timestamp":1787929315000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_295_26"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]]},"references-count":18,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_295_26","relation":{},"ISSN":["0972-9941","1998-3921"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0972-9941","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3921","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-05-18","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-07-07","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}