{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,28]],"date-time":"2026-08-28T15:36:19Z","timestamp":1787931379141,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Telerobotic surgery allows expert surgical care delivery across large distances using robotic systems and high-speed, low-latency networks. However, concerns regarding technical safety, clinical workflow and outcomes \u2013 particularly in settings without on-site surgical expertise \u2013 limit its global adoption.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy, workflow and technical requirements of long-distance telerobotic cholecystectomy in India using the indigenous SS Innovations (SSI) MantraSync robotic system and Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)-based dedicated connectivity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Two female patients underwent an elective telerobotic cholecystectomy with the surgeon located at Gurugram and the patient at Guwahati, separated by ~ 1950 km. A pre-established surgical workflow with a modified surgical safety checklist was followed. A strict contingency protocol, multilayered network security and backup conversion plans were implemented. Technical requirements included a dedicated 40 Mbps MPLS line, ultra-low latency video and control data paths and the RASCOW2 protocol for stable streaming. Perioperative and network parameters were prospectively recorded.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Both surgeries were completed successfully without intraoperative complications, conversions or technical failures. Console times were 51 and 30 mins, blood loss was minimal (10\u201315 mL), Visual Analogue Scale pain score at 24 h was 1\u20132 and uneventful discharge occurred on day 2. Network transmission latency was 35\u201340 ms, round-trip latency 250\u2013260 ms, with jitter &lt;10 ms and packet loss &lt;0.1%. All values were within recommended global benchmarks for telerobotic safety (&lt;320 ms round-trip). Functional handover to local control was verified and could be achieved in 2\u20133 min if needed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Telerobotic cholecystectomy using the SSI MantraSync platform and a robust network infrastructure is safe, feasible and effective, with technical and clinical outcomes comparable to in-person robotic surgery. Adherence to multidisciplinary workflow, safety checklists and redundancy protocols is critical. These results support expanded adoption of telerobotic surgery in resource-limited and remote environments, enabling broader access to advanced surgical care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jmas.jmas_458_25","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T19:00:16Z","timestamp":1780513216000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Safety, efficacy and scope of telerobotic surgery with the SS Innovations MantraSync: A case report with workflow and outcomes"],"prefix":"10.4103","author":[{"given":"Subhash","family":"Khanna","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Minimal Access, Gastrointestinal and Robotic Surgery, Swagat Super Speciality Surgical Institute and NH, Guwahati, Assam, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Areendam","family":"Barua","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Minimal Access and Robotic Surgical Oncology, Swagat Super Speciality Surgical Institute and NH, Guwahati, Assam, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Swagata","family":"Khanna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of ENT, Head, Neck, and Aesthetic Surgery, Swagat Super Speciality Surgical Institute and NH, Guwahati, Assam, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pranab Kr.","family":"Das","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Minimal Access, Gastrointestinal and Robotic Surgery, Swagat Super Speciality Surgical Institute and NH, Guwahati, Assam, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Supriya","family":"Choudhury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Minimal Access, Gastrointestinal and Robotic Surgery, Swagat Super Speciality Surgical Institute and NH, Guwahati, Assam, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kanineeka","family":"Das","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Swagat Super Speciality Surgical Institute and NH, Guwahati, Assam, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200204000-00005","article-title":"Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: Feasibility and potential applications","volume":"235","author":"Marescaux","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"R2-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1184","DOI":"10.1097\/CM9.0000000000003546","article-title":"Possibilities and challenges of telesurgical interventions","volume":"138","author":"Rath","year":"2025","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"R4-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2015.08.053","article-title":"Virtual interactive presence in global surgical education: International collaboration through augmented reality","volume":"86","author":"Davis","year":"2016","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"R5-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-016-1944-x","article-title":"Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: A preliminary study","volume":"35","author":"Jarc","year":"2017","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"R6-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-016-0564-1","article-title":"Beyond 2D telestration: An evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery","volume":"10","author":"Jarc","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"R7-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1097\/CM9.0000000000003257","article-title":"Influence of network latency and bandwidth on robot-assisted laparoscopic telesurgery: A pre-clinical experiment","volume":"138","author":"Wang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"R8-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-01984-w","article-title":"Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery","volume":"18","author":"Rocco","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"R9-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2569","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-3504-z","article-title":"Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer(\u00ae) simulator","volume":"28","author":"Xu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R10-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02333-1","article-title":"Telesurgery: Current status and strategies for latency reduction","volume":"19","author":"Motiwala","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"R11-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0274328","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0274328","article-title":"Maximum acceptable communication delay for the realization of telesurgery","volume":"17","author":"Nankaku","year":"2022","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"R12-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-024-02863-5","article-title":"Clinical practice guidelines for telesurgery 2022","volume":"54","author":"Mori","year":"2024","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"R13-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1708","DOI":"10.1002\/wjs.12653","article-title":"Expert consensus-based technical guidelines for remote robotic-assisted surgery and procedures","volume":"49","author":"Wang","year":"2025","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"R14-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1186\/1754-9493-7-19","article-title":"The second \u201ctime-out\u201d: A surgical safety checklist for lengthy robotic surgeries","volume":"7","author":"Song","year":"2013","journal-title":"Patient Saf Surg"},{"key":"R15-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5820","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-025-12006-7","article-title":"Robotic malfunction checklist: A guide to operating room safety, efficiency, and surgeon autonomy","volume":"39","author":"Desir","year":"2025","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R17-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-02148-6","article-title":"Evaluating the efficacy of telesurgery with dual console SSI mantra surgical robotic system: Experiment on animal model and clinical trials","volume":"18","author":"Srivastava","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"R18-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1093\/milmed\/usaf207","article-title":"Enabling technologies for remote surgery","volume":"190","author":"Bills","year":"2025","journal-title":"Mil Med"},{"key":"R19-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euros.2022.12.010","article-title":"Feasibility and safety of dual-console telesurgery with the KangDuo surgical robot-01 system using fifth-generation and wired networks: An animal experiment and clinical study","volume":"49","author":"Fan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur Urol Open Sci"},{"key":"R20-20260603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e20240601","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0601","article-title":"Advancing telesurgery connectivity between North and South America: The first remote surgery conducted between Orlando and S\u00e3o Paulo in animal models","volume":"51","author":"Moschovas","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Minimal Access Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_458_25","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T14:52:33Z","timestamp":1787755953000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_458_25"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]]},"references-count":18,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jmas.jmas_458_25","relation":{},"ISSN":["0972-9941","1998-3921"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0972-9941","type":"print"},{"value":"1998-3921","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-10-21","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-03-30","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}