{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T18:09:30Z","timestamp":1790791770286,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy, inadequate sampling, pain during the procedure (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] score), and ease of insertion of the Karman's cannula and Pipelle biopsy for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This prospective observational randomized comparative study included women of age more than 40 years with complaints of AUB. Two hundred and fifty women were randomly divided into two groups: (1) Group A (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 125) who underwent endometrial aspiration using Karman's cannula and (2) Group B (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 125) who underwent Pipelle endometrial sampling. Both the groups were followed by conventional dilation and curettage (D and C) which was considered the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for differentiating benign and malignant conditions of endometrium were calculated.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Group B had a sensitivity of 89.29% followed by Group A (86.36%); on the other hand, Group A had a specificity of 96.08% followed by Group B (95.74%) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &gt; 0.05). Inadequacy was comparable among the two groups with 1 inadequate in Group A and 3 inadequate in Group B. Mean VAS score was significantly lesser in Group A than Group B (4.5 \u00b1 2 vs. 5.8 \u00b1 2.1,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.0001). Ease of insertion was similar in Groups A and B (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.345).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Both procedures were equivalent in diagnostic accuracy, inadequacy, and ease of insertion. However, the use of Karman cannula resulted in less pain and is a much cheaper option in comparison to Pipelle. Overall, either procedure can be performed on an outpatient basis without cervical dilation and anesthesia and thus may be routinely used for women presenting with AUB.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jmh.jmh_292_20","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,2]],"date-time":"2022-05-02T06:58:20Z","timestamp":1651474700000},"page":"67-73","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A Randomized Comparative Study to Compare Karman's Cannula and Pipelle Biopsy for Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Meeta","family":"Gupta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Puneeta","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Poonam","family":"Yadav","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20200903","article-title":"A comparative study to evaluate endometrial aspiration using Karman's cannula versus dilatation and curettage in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"9","author":"Tomar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R2-12-20240906","first-page":"683","article-title":"Work loss associated with increased menstrual loss in the United States","volume":"100","author":"C\u00f4t\u00e9","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R3-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.21276\/obgyn.2021.7.2.19","article-title":"A study to compare the efficacy, inadequacy and patient knowledge of pipelle and dilatation and curettage (D&C) for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"7","author":"Gupta","year":"2021","journal-title":"New Indian J OBGYN"},{"key":"R4-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23544","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8545(00)80018-2","article-title":"Endometrial sampling techniques in the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"27","author":"Cooper","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"R5-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3496","DOI":"10.4103\/jfmpc.jfmpc_291_20","article-title":"Accuracy of Karman endometrial aspiration in comparison to conventional D and C in women with AUB at tertiary care hospital in North West Rajasthan","volume":"9","author":"Nama","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Family Med Prim Care"},{"key":"R6-12-20240906","first-page":"58","article-title":"Approach to diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"53","author":"Telner","year":"2007","journal-title":"Can Fam Physician"},{"key":"R7-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.5152\/jtgga.2013.01","article-title":"Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"14","author":"Abdelazim","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"R8-12-20240906","first-page":"EC01","article-title":"Evaluation of diagnostic efficacy of pipelle endometrial sampling in abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"12","author":"Chandrakumari","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"R9-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.13181\/mji.v7i1.793","article-title":"Endometrial biopsy collection from women receiving Norplant\u00ae","volume":"7","author":"Hadisaputra","year":"1998","journal-title":"Med J Indones"},{"key":"R10-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3965","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20183874","article-title":"Office endometrial sampling: A comparison between endosampler and karman cannula number 4","volume":"7","author":"Zutshi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R11-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.14740\/jcgo271w","article-title":"A comparative evaluation of the three different methods of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of perimenopausal bleeding","volume":"3","author":"Patil","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R12-12-20240906","first-page":"116","article-title":"Efficacy of pipelle as a tool for endometrial biopsy","volume":"23","author":"Yasmin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Biomedica"},{"key":"R13-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20150704","article-title":"Histological correlation of pipelle endometrial sampling with dilatation and curettage in abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"4","author":"Rachamallu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R14-12-20240906","first-page":"279","article-title":"Accuracy of endometrial biopsy with the Cornier pipelle for diagnosis of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia","volume":"24","author":"Machado","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"R15-12-20240906","first-page":"75","article-title":"Study of the efficacy of pipelle biopsy technique to diagnose endometrial diseases in abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"10","author":"Ilavarasi","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Midlife Health"},{"key":"R16-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2438-8","article-title":"Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling. Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C)?","volume":"286","author":"Demirkiran","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"R17-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11627.x","article-title":"Controlled analysis of factors associated with insufficient sample on outpatient endometrial biopsy","volume":"107","author":"Bakour","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R18-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.4274\/haseki.galenos.2019.5584","article-title":"Factors associated with insufficient endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women","volume":"58","author":"Ates","year":"2020","journal-title":"Med Bull Haseki"},{"key":"R19-12-20240906","first-page":"140","article-title":"Diagnostic utility of endometrial aspiration cytology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"9","author":"Handa","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Midlife Health"},{"key":"R20-12-20240906","first-page":"167983","article-title":"Endometrial aspiration cytology by Karman's cannula with histopathological correlation","volume":"6","author":"Saikia","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Sci Res"},{"key":"R21-12-20240906","first-page":"51722","article-title":"Diagnostic efficacy endometrial aspiration cytology in gynecological pathology","volume":"4","author":"Kenchappa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Indian J Pathol Oncol"},{"key":"R22-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2005.00324.x","article-title":"Diagnostic evaluation of Karman endometrial aspiration in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"31","author":"Tansathit","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"R23-12-20240906","first-page":"56","article-title":"Comparingthe pipelle with dilatation and curettage (D&C) in diagnostic power of sampling for evaluating the patients with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"7","author":"Moghaddam","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Med Invest"},{"key":"R24-12-20240906","first-page":"145","article-title":"Outpatient endometrial biopsy with pipelle vs.diagnostic dilatation and curettage","volume":"26","author":"Rauf","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad"},{"key":"R25-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1159\/000444711","article-title":"The effectiveness and acceptability of pipelle endometrial sampling versus classical dilatation and curettage: A three-year observational study","volume":"81","author":"Rezk","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"R26-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.5144\/0256-4947.2008.188","article-title":"Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"28","author":"Fakhar","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Saudi Med"},{"key":"R27-12-20240906","first-page":"32","article-title":"Abnormal uterine bleeding \u2013 Evaluation by endometrial aspiration","volume":"9","author":"Singh","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Midlife Health"},{"key":"R28-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3223","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-6012.ijrms20203497","article-title":"Role of pipelle versus dilatation and curettage in tissue diagnosis abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"8","author":"Balaram","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Res Med Sci"},{"key":"R29-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4238","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20194608","article-title":"A prospective study on the efficacy of pipelle biopsy to diagnose endometrial pathology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"8","author":"Mathew","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R30-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39519","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20183857","article-title":"Endometrial tissue sampling using pipelle versus dilatation and curettage for the assessment of endometrium in patients of perimenopausal and postmenopausal age: A prospective study","volume":"7","author":"Navakumar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R31-12-20240906","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.33545\/gynae.2020.v4.i1c.460","article-title":"A comparative study between pipelle endometrial sampling and dilatation curettage in abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"4","author":"Mamatha","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Mid-life Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmh.jmh_292_20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T14:53:09Z","timestamp":1787755989000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jmh.jmh_292_20"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jmh.jmh_292_20","relation":{},"ISSN":["0976-7800"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0976-7800","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}}}