{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T19:07:43Z","timestamp":1792004863426,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background and Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has numerous advantages against conventional oxygen therapy delivery systems. However, there is limited evidence supporting the use of HFNC in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) under procedural sedation. The aims of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of two different oxygen delivery devices, that is,HFNCand conventional nasal cannula on the oxygenation status of patients during procedural sedation for EUS.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Material and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Sixty adult patients undergoing EUS for various ailments were randomized to two groups group HFNC (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      =30) and group nasal cannula [NC (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 30)]. HFNC (AIRVO2, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, New Zealand) was used on patients in the group HFNC. Respiratory status of the patients was assessed using pulse oximetry, respiratory rate, procedural airway complications, and oxygen therapy adjustments. The endoscopist assessed the ease of performing EUS at the end of the procedure and patient satisfaction score (PSS) was assessed by using a Likert score in the post-anesthesia care unit.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      SpO2 measurements in the HFNC group during the procedure were marginally better compared to the NC group but this failed to reach statistical significance. Also, no significant association was found between both groups while comparing desaturation events (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.499), patient satisfaction score (PSS) and endendoscopist\u2019s satisfaction score (ESS) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.795). Both the groups were comparable in terms of airway manipulation, use of airway adjuncts, need to increase oxygen flow rate, endoscope removal, apneic episodes, hypotension, and bradycardia. No major complications were observed in either group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>HFNC use in patients undergoing EUS is not superior when compared to conventional nasal cannula oxygen therapy. HFNC failed to show any significant impact on decreasing the risk of desaturation events and airway manipulation during the procedure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.joacp_371_20","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,19]],"date-time":"2022-01-19T06:03:51Z","timestamp":1642572231000},"page":"648-654","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Comparative evaluation of efficacy of oxygenation using high flow nasal cannula vs. conventional nasal cannula during procedural sedation for endoscopic ultrasound: A pilot study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Kamalendra","family":"Shukla","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Dwarka, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Badal","family":"Parikh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Dwarka, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alok","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Dwarka, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monish","family":"Nakra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Dwarka, New Delhi, India"},{"name":"Department of Critical Care, Venkateshwar Hospital, Dwarka, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(04)01711-0","article-title":"Endoscopist administered propofol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective:A prospective study in 500 patients","volume":"60","author":"Yusoff","year":"2004","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"B2-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.12.011","article-title":"A prospective assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient and endoscopist satisfaction in ERCP with anesthesiologist-administered sedation","volume":"73","author":"Berzin","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"B3-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.4187\/respcare.01941","article-title":"High-flow oxygen administration by nasal cannula for adult and perinatal patients","volume":"58","author":"Ward","year":"2013","journal-title":"Resp Care"},{"key":"B4-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"886","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aep280","article-title":"Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure","volume":"103","author":"Parke","year":"2009","journal-title":"Brit J Anaesth"},{"key":"B5-20240828","first-page":"506382","article-title":"High-flow nasal interface improves oxygenation in patients undergoing bronchoscopy","volume":"2012","author":"Lucangelo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Crit Care Res Pract"},{"key":"B6-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1186\/s40560-015-0084-5","article-title":"High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in adults","volume":"3","author":"Nishimura","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Intensive Care"},{"key":"B7-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"998","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aer265","article-title":"Oxygen delivery through high-flow nasal cannulae increase end-expiratory lung volume and reduce respiratory rate in post-cardiac surgical patients","volume":"107","author":"Corley","year":"2011","journal-title":"Brit J Anaesth"},{"key":"B9-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280215588241","article-title":"Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable","volume":"25","author":"Whitehead","year":"2016","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"B10-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1016\/S1542-3565(05)00742-1","article-title":"Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy:A meta-analysis","volume":"3","author":"Qadeer","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"B11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-995346","article-title":"Deep sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:Intravenous propofol alone versus intravenous propofol with oral midazolam premedication","volume":"40","author":"Paspatis","year":"2008","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"B12-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.09.035","article-title":"Balanced propofol sedation for therapeutic GI endoscopic procedures:A prospective, randomized study","volume":"73","author":"Lee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"B13-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dld.2011.04.012","article-title":"Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy:A nationwide web survey in Italy","volume":"43","author":"Fanti","year":"2011","journal-title":"Dig Liver Dis"},{"key":"B14-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dld.2009.03.003","article-title":"Endoscopic sedation in Greece:Results from a nationwide survey for the Hellenic Foundation of gastroenterology and nutrition","volume":"41","author":"Paspatis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Dig Liver Dis"},{"key":"B15-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1650","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2009.250","article-title":"Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy:Results in 10,662 adults","volume":"104","author":"Horiuchi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"B16-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1291421","article-title":"Moderate sedation for elective upper endoscopy with balanced propofol versus fentanyl and midazolam alone:A randomized clinical trial","volume":"44","author":"Levitzky","year":"2012","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"B17-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.91.1.135","article-title":"Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow","volume":"91","author":"Locke","year":"1993","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"B18-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.107.2.304","article-title":"Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants:An evaluation of three devices","volume":"107","author":"Courtney","year":"2001","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"B19-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.109.4.718","article-title":"High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the management of apnea of prematurity","volume":"109","author":"Dutta","year":"2002","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"B20-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211543","article-title":"Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation:A prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial","volume":"26","author":"Woodhead","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"B21-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2017.05.038","article-title":"Comparison of changes in respiratory dynamics immediately after the start of propofol sedation with or without midazolam","volume":"76","author":"Hagiwara","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"B22-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1058","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2014.12.020","article-title":"A nasal high flow system prevents hypoxia in dental patients under intravenous sedation","volume":"73","author":"Sago","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"B23-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4206795","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/4206795","article-title":"High-flow nasal cannula and mandibular advancement bite block decrease hypoxic events during sedative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy:A randomized clinical trial","volume":"2019","author":"Teng","year":"2019","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"B24-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1164\/rccm.201402-0364OC","article-title":"Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome","volume":"190","author":"Maggiore","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Respir Crit Care Med"},{"key":"B25-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1354","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.2711","article-title":"Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on reintubation in low-risk patients:A randomized clinical trial","volume":"315","author":"Hern\u00e1ndez","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"B26-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10398","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v22.i47.10398","article-title":"High-flow nasal oxygen availability for sedation decreases the use of general anesthesia during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound","volume":"22","author":"Schumann","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"B27-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrc.2011.07.075","article-title":"Impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on intensive care unit patients with acute respiratory failure:A prospective observational study","volume":"27","author":"Sztrymf","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Crit Care"},{"key":"B28-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2011.04.028","article-title":"Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care 107 for GI endoscopy:An 8-year experience","volume":"74","author":"Agostoni","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"B30-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-814117","article-title":"Preparation, premedication, and surveillance","volume":"36","author":"Bell","year":"2004","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"B31-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1620","DOI":"10.21037\/jtd.2016.12.08","article-title":"Nasal high flow oxygen therapy after extubation:The road is open but don't drive too fast!","volume":"8","author":"Rabbat","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Thorac Dis"},{"key":"B32-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211561","article-title":"Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus infant flow for preterm infants","volume":"26","author":"Campbell","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinatol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joacp.JOACP_371_20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T19:07:24Z","timestamp":1787166444000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joacp.JOACP_371_20"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_371_20","relation":{},"ISSN":["2231-2730","0970-9185"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2231-2730","type":"print"},{"value":"0970-9185","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2020-06-23","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2020-08-30","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}