{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:32:37Z","timestamp":1786649557152,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]],"date-time":"2025-03-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742601600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background and Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector (LMPt) and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal (LMPs) have a high oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) but have not been compared for laparoscopic surgery. It was hypothesized that LMPs and LMPt have different clinical performances while managing the airway of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The aim of the study was to compare the LMPs and LMPt for managing the airway of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Material and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized, comparative trial. It included adult patients of either gender with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I\/II planned for elective laparoscopic surgery. The airway of the recruited subjects was managed with either LMPs (group R, n = 60) or LMPt (group T, n = 60). OLP was the primary outcome variable. Number of attempts, insertion success, device insertion duration, ease of insertion, hemodynamics, gastric tube insertion, and complications were secondary outcome variables. Numerical data and dichotomous data were analyzed using student\u2019s\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test and \u03c7\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      test, respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The OLP was statistically greater (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001) in group T before (30.23 \u00b1 1.48 vs. 25.33 \u00b1 1.40 cm H\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O) and during (31.77 \u00b1 0.65 vs. 27.12 \u00b1 1.11 cm H\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O) the pneumoperitoneum. The baseline and secondary outcome variables were statistically similar between the groups.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>For patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery, both LMPt and LMPs are suitable for airway management, but LMPt provides a higher OLP. More trials are required to validate these findings across different surgical settings and patient populations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.joacp_430_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]],"date-time":"2025-03-22T17:13:01Z","timestamp":1742663581000},"page":"532-537","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Laryngeal mask airway proseal versus laryngeal mask airway protector for laparoscopic surgery: A randomized comparative study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Vinod K.","family":"Srivastava","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, King George\u2019s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rajesh","family":"Raman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, King George\u2019s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rati","family":"Prabha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, King George\u2019s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deshraj","family":"Verma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, King George\u2019s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brij B.","family":"Kushwaha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, King George\u2019s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shefali","family":"Gautam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, King George\u2019s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.12968\/hmed.2016.77.1.24","article-title":"Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery","volume":"77","author":"Oti","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Hosp Med (Lond)"},{"key":"R2-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e4598","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000004598","article-title":"Comparison between supraglottic airway devices and endotracheal tubes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery:A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"95","author":"Park","year":"2016","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"R3-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2018.12.044","article-title":"Comparison of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries:A network meta-analysis","volume":"55","author":"Yoon","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R4-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1007\/s10877-022-00910-5","article-title":"Assessing a novel second generation laryngeal mask airway using the 'ADEPT'approach:Results from the LMA\u00ae Protector\u2122 observational study","volume":"37","author":"N\u00edEochag\u00e1in","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Clin Monit Comput"},{"key":"R5-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-021-01535-y","article-title":"LMA\u00aeprotector\u2122 in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries:A multicenter prospective observational study","volume":"21","author":"Liu","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R8-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.4103\/sja.SJA_79_18","article-title":"Comparison of I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and nonobese patients","volume":"12","author":"Prabha","year":"2018","journal-title":"Saudi J Anaesth"},{"key":"R9-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S227","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.ija_152_23","article-title":"Comparison of clinical performance of Baska mask and Ambu AuraGain in patients undergoing surgery:A single-blinded, randomised comparative trial","volume":"67","author":"Raman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R10-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.4103\/ijabmr.ijabmr_520_23","article-title":"Clinical performance of I-gel\u00ae and BlockBuster\u2122 laryngeal mask airway in adult patients during general anesthesia:A randomized comparison","volume":"14","author":"Das","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int J Appl Basic Med Res"},{"key":"R11-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S245","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.ija_403_23","article-title":"Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA ProSeal in anaesthetised paralysed patients-A randomised controlled trial","volume":"67","author":"Bhardwaj","year":"2023","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R12-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.ija_371_22","article-title":"Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA-ProSeal in different head and neck positions in anaesthetized and paralyzed patients;A prospective randomized study","volume":"67","author":"Kerai","year":"2023","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R13-20250620","article-title":"OpenEpi:Open-Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version","author":"Dean"},{"key":"R14-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-023-02337-0","article-title":"Impact of a positive end-expiratory pressure strategy on oxygenation, respiratory compliance, and hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery in non-obese patients:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"23","author":"Yessenbayeva","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R15-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-022-01613-9","article-title":"Effects of dynamic individualized PEEP guided by driving pressure in laparoscopic surgery on postoperative atelectasis in elderly patients:A prospective randomized controlled trial","volume":"22","author":"Xu","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R16-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.ija_398_22","article-title":"Supraglottic airway devices versus endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic surgeries:An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"67","author":"Kumar","year":"2023","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R17-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.5114\/ait.2022.118878","article-title":"Comparison of LMA protector vs. endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery:A randomised controlled trial","volume":"54","author":"Yilmaz","year":"2022","journal-title":"Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther"},{"key":"R18-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.23736\/S0375-9393.18.12421-7","article-title":"LMA protector\u2122 airway:First experience with a new second generation laryngeal mask","volume":"85","author":"Eckardt","year":"2019","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"},{"key":"R19-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.joacp_248_22","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of self-pressurized Air-Q\u00ae and ProsealTM LMA\u00ae in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia:A randomized clinical trial","volume":"40","author":"Rana","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R20-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S20","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.IJA_1254_20","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of Air-Q blocker and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia:A randomised controlled trial","volume":"65","author":"Jindal","year":"2021","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"}],"container-title":["Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_430_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T18:55:23Z","timestamp":1786647323000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_430_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_430_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9185","2231-2730"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9185","type":"print"},{"value":"2231-2730","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-08-24","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-12-28","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}