{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:22:18Z","timestamp":1787840538622,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1750291200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background and Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Airway protection and adequate ventilation are the main aim for the patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia. The study intended to compare the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and insertion parameters and postoperative complications between Ambu AuraGain and i-gel in laparoscopic hernia repair surgeries. The primary objective was to compare the OLP at insertion and after pneumoperitoneum and positioning. The secondary objectives were to compare the time required for insertion, number of attempts, ease of insertion, and ability to insert gastric tube, grade of fiber-optic glottic view and postoperative complications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Material and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A randomized controlled trial of 50 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grade I and II, aged between 18\u201360 years, was randomly divided into group AAG and Group IG.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of OLP at insertion and 5 min after pneumoperitoneum. However, OLP at 30 min of pneumoperitoneum was statistically higher with Ambu AuraGain than i-gel (27.72 \u00b1 2.67 cm H\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O versus 25.50 \u00b1 2.38 cm H\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      value = 0.002). The fiber-optic glottic view was better with Ambu AuraGain than i-gel at 5 min and 30 min after pneumoperitoneum (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      value = 0.038 and 0.043, respectively). Ambu AuraGain took longer insertion time compared to i-gel which was statistically significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The OLP and fiber-optic glottic view of Ambu AuraGain are better than i-gel with longer insertion time, and the rest of the variables were comparable. We conclude that Ambu AuraGain is superior to i-gel in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.joacp_439_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T11:01:14Z","timestamp":1750244474000},"page":"516-522","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and insertion characteristics of Ambu AuraGain and i-gel in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A randomized control trial"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"41","author":[{"family":"Anupma","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt BD Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Swati","family":"Chhabra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sadik","family":"Mohammed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Manoj","family":"Kamal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rakesh","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pradeep","family":"Bhatia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250620","first-page":"565","article-title":"Airway management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy\u2013A comparative analysis","volume":"61","author":"Videnovi\u0107","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acta Clin Croat"},{"key":"R2-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-200108000-00050","article-title":"Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents in anesthetic practice","volume":"93","author":"Ng","year":"2001","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R3-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.140210","article-title":"I-gel as an alternative to endotracheal tube in adult laparoscopic surgeries:A comparative study","volume":"11","author":"Badheka","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Min Access Surg"},{"key":"R4-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03017420","article-title":"The LMA-ProSeal\u2122 is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"49","author":"Maltby","year":"2002","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R5-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.IJA_285_17","article-title":"A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu\u00ae AuraGain\u2122:A prospective observational study","volume":"61","author":"Parikh","year":"2017","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R6-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.01.047","article-title":"Use of the new supraglottic device \u201cAmbu\u00ae AuraGain\u2122\u201d in clinical settings","volume":"31","author":"Ueshima","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R7-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2010.06534.x","article-title":"Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the Igel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation","volume":"65","author":"Teoh","year":"2010","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R8-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-018-1120-4","article-title":"Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu\u00aeAuraGain\u2122and the LMA\u00aeSupreme\u2122supraglottic airways:A randomized- controlled trial","volume":"65","author":"Wong","year":"2018","journal-title":"Can J Anesth"},{"key":"R9-20250620","first-page":"17","article-title":"Use of Baska mask in military trauma and disasters:Military medicine on the move","volume":"9","author":"Lamba","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian J Appl Res"},{"key":"R10-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.4097\/kjae.2010.59.5.329","article-title":"The effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on respiratory mechanics during pelviscopic surgery","volume":"59","author":"Suh","year":"2010","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R11-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/82.2.286","article-title":"Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients","volume":"82","author":"Keller","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R12-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1007\/s10877-016-9963-0","article-title":"A randomized comparison of the AmbuAuraGain\u2122versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery","volume":"31","author":"Lopez","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Monit Comput"},{"key":"R13-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1082","DOI":"10.15537\/smj.2018.11.22346","article-title":"AuraGain\u2122 and i-Gel laryngeal masks in general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"39","author":"Sabuncu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"R14-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2018.12.044","article-title":"Comparison of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries:A network meta-analysis","volume":"55","author":"Yoon","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R15-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X211030521","article-title":"Ventilatory performance of AMBU\u00aeAuraGain\u2122 and LMA\u00aeSupreme\u2122 in laparoscopic surgery:A randomised controlled trial","volume":"49","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"R16-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634320","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/634320","article-title":"Comparison of the proseal, supreme, and i-gel SAD in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries","volume":"2015","author":"Mukadder","year":"2015","journal-title":"Sci World J"},{"key":"R17-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.74583","article-title":"PLMA vs. I-gel:A comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"26","author":"Sharma","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R18-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.IJA_938_20","article-title":"Supraglottic airway devices:Placement and pharyngeal seal matter!","volume":"64","author":"Solanki","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R19-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-019-0785-8","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector and i-gel in paralyzed, anesthetized patients","volume":"19","author":"Chang","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R20-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.3126\/ajms.v12i4.32931","article-title":"A randomised comparison and evaluation of I-gel, Supreme laryngeal mask airway and Ambu Auragain in Laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation","volume":"12","author":"Pradeep","year":"2021","journal-title":"Asian J Med Sci"},{"key":"R21-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.IJA_163_17","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of Ambu AuraGain with ProSeal\u2122laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"61","author":"Singh","year":"2017","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R22-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.105798","article-title":"Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA Proseal","volume":"29","author":"Chauhan","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R23-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.4038\/slja.v25i1.8195","article-title":"Comparison of clinical performance of I-gel with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in elective surgery in adults","volume":"25","author":"Curpod","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sri Lanka J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R24-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2011.07002.x","article-title":"LMA Supreme\u2122vs i-gel\u2122- a comparison of insertion success in novices","volume":"67","author":"Ragazzi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"}],"container-title":["Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_439_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:24:42Z","timestamp":1787837082000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_439_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_439_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9185","2231-2730"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9185","type":"print"},{"value":"2231-2730","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-09-01","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-12-30","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}