{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:22:19Z","timestamp":1787840539556,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]],"date-time":"2025-03-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742601600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background and Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Traumatic cervical spine injury (tCSI) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (POPC) after surgical fixation. Sugammadex provides superior neuromuscular recovery; however, its effectiveness in reducing POPC in tCSI remains unclear. The primary outcome of this study was the ultrasonographic lung aeration score (LAS) at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included extubation success in the operation theatre, POPC, length of intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, need for tracheostomy, hospital stay after surgery, and in-hospital mortality.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Material and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In this prospective, double-blinded, randomised control trial, 75 patients undergoing elective fixation of tCSI were randomly allocated to either the neostigmine (N) group (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 37) or sugammadex (S) group (n = 38) for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversal. A\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There was no significant difference in LAS at 24 hours between groups [median (range) LAS: 2 (0\u201318) in the N group, 2 (0\u201319) in the S group] (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.632) or in any other secondary outcomes. The incidence of POPC was 27.03% in the N group and 26.32% in the S group (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.944) Exploratory analysis did not find any difference in outcomes based on the level [high (C1\u2013C4) vs. low (C5\u2013C7)] or severity [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale: A, B vs. C, D, E] of spinal injury (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &gt; 0.05). A LAS of 4 at 24 h predicted the development of POPC within 7 days with 80% sensitivity and 87.27% specificity (area under the receiver operator characteristics curve: 0.9032).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In tCSI, NMB reversal using either sugammadex or neostigmine resulted in comparable LAS at 24 h postoperatively following cervical spine fixation. Additionally, a LAS of 4 was found to be a strong predictor of POPC within a 7-day follow-up period.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.joacp_513_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]],"date-time":"2025-03-22T17:17:45Z","timestamp":1742663865000},"page":"523-531","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Effect of Sugammadex versus neostigmine reversal on lung aeration score after operative fixation of cervical spine: A prospective, double blinded, randomised control trial"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Sumit R.","family":"Chowdhury","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ashish","family":"Bindra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gyaninder P.","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charu","family":"Mahajan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maroof A.","family":"Khan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1038\/s41394-020-00371-5","article-title":"Respiratory morbidity and mortality of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury at a level I trauma center in India","volume":"7","author":"Sengupta","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spinal Cord Ser Cases"},{"key":"R2-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698736","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2021.698736","article-title":"Management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury:A review of the literature","volume":"8","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"key":"R3-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1660876","article-title":"Retrospective study of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with cervical spine pathology","volume":"5","author":"Dube","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Neuroanaesth Crit Care"},{"key":"R4-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1371","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000003256","article-title":"Sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade and postoperative pulmonary complications (STRONGER) a multicenter matched cohort analysis","volume":"132","author":"Kheterpal","year":"2020","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R5-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2020.01.016","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on the incidence of pulmonary complications in older adults undergoing prolonged surgery","volume":"124","author":"Togioka","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R6-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2021.01.047","article-title":"Effect of driving pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration on postoperative lung atelectasis in adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery:A randomized controlled trial","volume":"170","author":"Mini","year":"2021","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"R7-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-021-01236-6","article-title":"The role of ultrasonographic lung aeration score in the prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications:An observational study","volume":"21","author":"Szab\u00f3","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R8-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000001603","article-title":"Lung ultrasonography for the assessment of perioperative atelectasis:A pilot feasibility study","volume":"124","author":"Monastesse","year":"2017","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R9-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2064","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0b013e31824e68ae","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of lung aeration loss during a successful weaning trial predicts postextubation distress","volume":"40","author":"Soummer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"key":"R10-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.12659\/AOT.907883","article-title":"Retrospective comparative study on postoperative pulmonary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation using the Melbourne Group Scale (MGS-2) diagnostic criteria","volume":"23","author":"Li","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Transplant"},{"key":"R11-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.14243","article-title":"Lung ultrasound compared with chest X-ray in diagnosing postoperative pulmonary complications following cardiothoracic surgery:A prospective observational study","volume":"73","author":"Touw","year":"2018","journal-title":"Anaesth"},{"key":"R12-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000004505","article-title":"Neostigmine versus sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade and effects on reintubation for respiratory failure or newly initiated noninvasive ventilation:An interrupted time series design","volume":"131","author":"Krause","year":"2020","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R13-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/S2213-2600(18)30294-7","article-title":"Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR):A multicentre, prospective observational study","volume":"7","author":"Kirmeier","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet Respir Med"},{"key":"R14-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.15940","article-title":"The effects of sugammadex vs. neostigmine on postoperative respiratory complications and advanced healthcare utilisation:A multicentre retrospective cohort study","volume":"78","author":"Suleiman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Anaesth"},{"key":"R15-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.14160","article-title":"The comparative efficacy and safety of sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. A Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis","volume":"73","author":"Hristovska","year":"2018","journal-title":"Anaesth"},{"key":"R16-20250620","first-page":"241","article-title":"The I COUGH multidisciplinary perioperative pulmonary care program:One decade of experience","volume":"46","author":"Cassidy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf"},{"key":"R17-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.08.021","article-title":"How robust are the STRONGER and STIL-STRONGER studies?","volume":"130","author":"Blobner","year":"2023","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R18-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1043","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000005842","article-title":"Sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of residual neuromuscular blocks after surgery:A retrospective cohort analysis of postoperative side effects","volume":"134","author":"Ruetzler","year":"2022","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R19-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.joacp_289_21","article-title":"Emergency use of sugammadex after failure of standard reversal drugs and postoperative pulmonary complications:A retrospective cohort study","volume":"39","author":"Bruceta","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R20-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1517","DOI":"10.1089\/neu.2009.1138","article-title":"Survival after spinal cord injury:A systematic review","volume":"27","author":"van den Berg","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurotrauma"},{"key":"R21-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1548","DOI":"10.1378\/chest.121.5.1548","article-title":"Impact of respiratory complications on length of stay and hospital costs in acute cervical spine injury","volume":"121","author":"Winslow","year":"2002","journal-title":"Chest"},{"key":"R22-20250620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000006219","article-title":"Sugammadex versus neostigmine for recovery of respiratory muscle strength measured by ultrasonography in the postextubation period:A randomized controlled trial","volume":"136","author":"Huang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_513_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:24:41Z","timestamp":1787837081000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_513_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_513_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0970-9185","2231-2730"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0970-9185","type":"print"},{"value":"2231-2730","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-10-18","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-01-14","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}