{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T20:22:56Z","timestamp":1787775776427,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured by ocular response analyzer (ORA) in contact lens-induced corneal warpage, normal, and keratoconic eyes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In a prospective, observational case\u2013control study, 94 eyes of 47 warpage-suspected cases and 46 eyes of 23 keratoconic patients were enrolled. Warpage-suspected cases were followed until a definite diagnosis was made (warpage, nonwarpage normal, or keratoconus). ORA tonometry and corneal biomechanics testing were performed for all cases in each visit. We had 2\u20133 measured corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) for each patient (based on group) with at least 2-week interval.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      After following up of warpage-suspected patients, finally 44 eyes of 22 patients had confirmed soft contact lens-related corneal warpage. Forty-six eyes of 23 people were finally diagnosed as nonwarpage normal eyes. Forty-six eyes of 23 known keratoconus patients were also included for comparison. The demographic and refractive data were not different between the warpage and nonwarpage normal groups but were different in the keratoconus group. Both IOPcc and IOPg were statistically different with the highest value in the warpage group followed by normal and keratoconus groups; the same trend was observed in central corneal thickness (CCT). The mean of IOPg was 14.94 \u00b1 2.65, 13.7 \u00b1 2.33, and 10.86 \u00b1 3 and IOPcc was 15.73 \u00b1 2.4, 15.28 \u00b1 2.43, and 14.08 \u00b1 2.55 in the warpage, normal, and keratoconus groups, respectively. IOPg and IOPcc in the warpage group (based on baseline diagnosis) did not regress to become closer to IOP of normal eyes after discontinuation of contact lens in their follow-up visits (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      value for IOPg and IOPcc trends in the warpage group was 0.07 and 0.09 controlling for CCT, respectively). Both IOPcc and IOPg were significantly lower in keratoconic eyes in comparison with normal eyes. After correction for the confounding effect of CCT, a lower IOPcc in keratoconus versus warpage remained significant (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.02).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Both IOPcc and IOPg were statistically different with the highest value in the warpage group followed by normal and keratoconus groups, just like their CCT. After correction for the confounding effect of CCT, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in their measured IOPcc and IOPg except for IOPcc in keratoconus versus warpage (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.02).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/joco.joco_147_20","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,15]],"date-time":"2021-07-15T06:19:19Z","timestamp":1626329959000},"page":"118-123","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Tonometry by Ocular Response Analyzer in Keratoconic and Warpage Eyes in Comparison with Normal Eyes"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Fateme","family":"Alipour","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Narges","family":"Hassanpoor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Moggan","family":"Letafatnejad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amir-Hooshang","family":"Beheshtnejad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Seyed-Farzad","family":"Mohammadi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-4-20240910","first-page":"S92","article-title":"Prevalence of contact lens use and its complications among students of Gulf Medical University, Ajman","volume":"2","author":"Omar","year":"2013","journal-title":"GMJ, ASM"},{"key":"R2-4-20240910","first-page":"21","article-title":"The prevalence and pattern of contact lens use in a Singapore community","volume":"26","author":"Lee","year":"2000","journal-title":"CLAO J"},{"key":"R3-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/S1367-0484(03)00026-2","article-title":"Hydrogel contact lens-induced corneal warpage","volume":"26","author":"Schornack","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cont Lens Anterior Eye"},{"key":"R4-4-20240910","first-page":"5603763","article-title":"Corneal biomechanical findings in contact lens induced corneal warpage","volume":"2016","author":"Alipour","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R5-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.10.044","article-title":"Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer","volume":"31","author":"Luce","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R6-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.09.036","article-title":"Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry","volume":"143","author":"Pepose","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R7-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.11.018","article-title":"Biomechanical characteristics of the ectatic cornea","volume":"34","author":"Kerautret","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R8-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5337","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.06-0557","article-title":"Corneal thickness and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer","volume":"47","author":"Kotecha","year":"2006","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R9-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2336","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(02)01276-9","article-title":"Corneal thickness indices discriminate between keratoconus and contact lens-induced corneal thinning","volume":"109","author":"Pflugfelder","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R10-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20110112-01","article-title":"Corneal biomechanics following Epi-LASIK","volume":"27","author":"Ryan","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R11-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1247","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e3181ca6383","article-title":"Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with keratoconus after penetrating keratoplasty","volume":"29","author":"Yenerel","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"R12-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2005.12.007","article-title":"Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage","volume":"141","author":"Congdon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R14-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3226","DOI":"10.12998\/wjcc.v7.i20.3226","article-title":"Longitudinal observation of intraocular pressure variations with acute altitude changes","volume":"7","author":"Xie","year":"2019","journal-title":"World J Clin Cases"},{"key":"R15-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e31815c3a93","article-title":"Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma","volume":"17","author":"Ang","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R16-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e3181784673","article-title":"Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma","volume":"85","author":"Sullivan-Mee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"R17-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3262","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.07-1556","article-title":"Corneal biomechanics and optic nerve head compliance: Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface deformation in glaucoma patients","volume":"49","author":"Wells","year":"2008","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R18-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-007-0756-5","article-title":"Lower corneal hysteresis in glaucoma patients with acquired pit of the optic nerve (APON)","volume":"246","author":"Bochmann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R19-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10008-1103","article-title":"Ocular Response Analyzer","volume":"6","author":"Kaushik","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Curr Glaucoma Pract"},{"key":"R20-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(90)32516-2","article-title":"Topographic changes in contact lens-induced corneal warpage","volume":"97","author":"Wilson","year":"1990","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R21-4-20240910","first-page":"169","article-title":"Time to resolution of contact lens-induced corneal warpage prior to refractive surgery","volume":"28","author":"Wang","year":"2002","journal-title":"CLAO J"},{"key":"R22-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.3109\/02713683.2012.669007","article-title":"Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: The ocular response analyzer","volume":"37","author":"Terai","year":"2012","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res"},{"key":"R23-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.3109\/02713683.2014.978479","article-title":"Assessment of the Ocular Response Analyzer as an instrument for measurement of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics","volume":"40","author":"Elsheikh","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res"},{"key":"R25-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.optom.2016.04.005","article-title":"Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus","volume":"10","author":"\u00d6zcura","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Optom"}],"container-title":["Journal of Current Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/JOCO.JOCO_147_20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T19:42:06Z","timestamp":1787773326000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/JOCO.JOCO_147_20"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/joco.joco_147_20","relation":{},"ISSN":["2452-2325"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2452-2325","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]}}}