{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T19:14:48Z","timestamp":1791486888819,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To analyze the results of ocular refraction at the age of 7 years in children after congenital cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A study of ocular biometric data of 143 eyes who underwent lens aspiration with IOL implantation in unilateral (23 eyes) and bilateral (60 eyes) congenital cataracts was performed. All children were divided into groups according to the age categories at the time of surgery: Group A (0\u201312 months) - 43 eyes; Group B (12\u201336 months) - 45 eyes; and Group C (older than 36 months) - 55 eyes. An empirical reduction of the implanted IOL power was performed: an undercorrection of 20% in children aged 0 to 36 months and 10% less in children aged 36 to 60 months.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      By age 7 years, the mean elongation \u00b1 standard deviation (SD) in Group A was 3.93 \u00b1 1.64 mm, 2.13 \u00b1 0.94 mm in Group B, and 0.95 \u00b1 0.76 mm in Group C (18.7%, 9.5%, and 4.1% of the baseline axial length, respectively). There was no significant difference in axial elongation between unilateral and bilateral congenital cataracts (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.32). The mean absolute refraction error (MAE) at last examination was 3.99 \u00b1 2.12 diopter (D), 2.46 \u00b1 1.48 D, and 1.59 \u00b1 1.31 D in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. In infants younger than 7 months of age, by age 7 years, the mean elongation \u00b1 SD was 3.27 \u00b1 2.86 mm (25.5%) and MAE was 3.44 \u00b1 2.1 D. The prevalence of preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.0 D or more was 48.95%, 2.0 D or more was 27.27%, and 3.0 D or more was 5.6%. There was no significant difference in preoperative corneal astigmatism between unilateral (1.62 \u00b1 0.77 D) and bilateral (1.78 \u00b1 0.90 D) congenital cataracts (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.56, 95% confidence interval = \u22120.50\u20130.28). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) more than 20\/40 was in 53.49%, 55.55%, and 74.54% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Although IOL power was calculated in accordance with children's age, at the age of 7 years, there was a different degree of ametropia because of the biometric changes of the growing eye, and a higher rate of ametropia was observed more in the younger age group than in the elder age groups.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/joco.joco_245_21","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,5]],"date-time":"2022-12-05T10:16:15Z","timestamp":1670235375000},"page":"290-296","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Long-term Results of Congenital Cataract Surgery with Primary Intraocular Lens Implantation"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Lukpan","family":"Orazbekov","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sabina","family":"Smagulova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kairat","family":"Ruslanuly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1252","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2013.07.014","article-title":"Predictability of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in infantile eyes with unilateral congenital cataract: Results from the infant aphakia treatment study","volume":"156","author":"Vanderveen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R2-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01156-7","article-title":"Refractive change in pediatric pseudophakia: 6-year follow-up","volume":"28","author":"Plager","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R3-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"772","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(98)00247-5","article-title":"Refractive changes after pediatric intraocular lens implantation","volume":"126","author":"Enyedi","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R4-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2004.06.068","article-title":"Rate of axial growth after congenital cataract surgery","volume":"138","author":"Vasavada","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R5-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2014.531","article-title":"Comparison of contact lens and intraocular lens correction of monocular aphakia during infancy: A randomized clinical trial of HOTV optotype acuity at age 4.5 years and clinical findings at age 5 years","volume":"132","author":"Lambert","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R6-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"822","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2016.12.040","article-title":"Myopic shift 5 years after intraocular lens implantation in the infant aphakia treatment study","volume":"124","author":"Weakley","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R7-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(97)80043-0","article-title":"Choice of lens and dioptric power in pediatric pseudophakia","volume":"23","author":"Dahan","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R8-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1180","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2015.2062","article-title":"Long-term results of pediatric cataract surgery and primary intraocular lens implantation from 7 to 22 months of life","volume":"133","author":"Struck","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R9-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sjopt.2011.11.002","article-title":"Axial length measurement techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract","volume":"26","author":"Wilson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Saudi J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R10-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1985.01050060045020","article-title":"Refractive development of the human eye","volume":"103","author":"Gordon","year":"1985","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R11-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1242","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.2016.171","article-title":"Comparison of IOL power calculation formulae for pediatric eyes","volume":"30","author":"Vasavada","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eye (Lond"},{"key":"R12-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1356","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(97)80115-0","article-title":"Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations","volume":"23","author":"Holladay","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R13-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1001\/archophthalmol.2007.22","article-title":"Keratometry in pediatric eyes with cataract","volume":"126","author":"Trivedi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R14-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1067\/mpa.2002.126492","article-title":"Prospective analysis of pediatric pseudophakia: Myopic shift and postoperative outcomes","volume":"6","author":"Crouch","year":"2002","journal-title":"J AAPOS"},{"key":"R15-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22092","DOI":"10.1038\/srep22092","article-title":"Prevalence of corneal astigmatism and anterior segmental biometry characteristics before surgery in Chinese congenital cataract patients","volume":"6","author":"Lin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"R16-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sjopt.2019.07.004","article-title":"Biometry characteristics in congenital cataract patients before surgery in a tertiary eye care centre in Nepal","volume":"33","author":"Sahu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Saudi J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R17-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1097\/ICL.0000000000000291","article-title":"The infant aphakia treatment study contact lens experience to age 5 years","volume":"43","author":"Russell","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eye Contact Lens"},{"key":"R18-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1102","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000283","article-title":"Visual outcomes after toric intraocular lens implantation in pediatric eyes undergoing cataract surgery","volume":"46","author":"Vasavada","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R20-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2010.06.042","article-title":"Axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract","volume":"118","author":"Trivedi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R21-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1067\/mpa.2002.126493","article-title":"Minimal myopic shift in pseudophakic versus aphakic pediatric cataract patients","volume":"6","author":"Superstein","year":"2002","journal-title":"J AAPOS"},{"key":"R22-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1001\/archophthalmol.2011.347","article-title":"Glaucoma-related adverse events in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study: 1-year results","volume":"130","author":"Beck","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R23-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1260","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.2016.170","article-title":"Second intraocular surgery after primary pediatric cataract surgery: Indications and outcomes during long-term follow-up at a tertiary eye care center","volume":"30","author":"Sachdeva","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eye (Lond"},{"key":"R24-4-20240910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1001\/archophthalmol.2010.101","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial comparing contact lens with intraocular lens correction of monocular aphakia during infancy: Grating acuity and adverse events at age 1 year","volume":"128","author":"Lambert","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Current Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joco.joco_245_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T15:18:17Z","timestamp":1787757497000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/joco.joco_245_21"}},"subtitle":["A Case\u2013Control Study of Three Age Groups"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/joco.joco_245_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["2452-2325"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2452-2325","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]}}}