{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:30:31Z","timestamp":1787841031182,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"Suppl 4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>\n                    A\n                    <jats:sc>BSTRACT<\/jats:sc>\n                  <\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Because of the posterior mandible\u2019s shortened vertical bone height, using dental implants, there comes with special difficulties. It has been suggested that using short implants (\u22648 mm) would prevent the need for subsequent surgical operations such as bone grafting. In total, 180 implants were inserted into the posterior mandible in 120 individuals who were part of this retrospective cohort research. Ninety patients in the short implant group (implants \u22648 mm) and 90 patients in the standard implant group (implants \u226510 mm) were split into two groups. Expert medical professionals installed all of the implants, and fixed prostheses were used to repair them. Over a 5-year follow-up period, clinical indicators such as implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), probing depth (PD), and patient satisfaction were evaluated.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Whereas conventional implants showed a survival rate of 95.6% (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.42), the survival rate of short implants was 92.5%. The standard implant group (mean MBL: 1.0 mm) and the short implant group (mean MBL: 1.3 mm) had somewhat increased bone loss, but the difference was not statistically significant (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.15). The two groups\u2019 mean probing depth and patient satisfaction ratings were similar, with 2.6 mm for short implants and 2.4 mm for traditional implants (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.38). Both implant types showed good clinical results overall with little side effects.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Comparing short implants to standard implants in the posterior mandible, comparable long-term clinical results are shown. Short implants are a good substitute even if they have a little greater bone loss rate. This is especially true when there is a restricted vertical bone height.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1165_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,6]],"date-time":"2024-12-06T07:00:14Z","timestamp":1733468414000},"page":"S3661-S3663","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Short Implants Versus Conventional Implants in the Posterior Mandible"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Nasser Raqe","family":"Alqhtani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdullaziz University, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20241227","first-page":"249","article-title":"Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants: A 5-year post-loading report from a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"11","author":"Felice","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R2-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2012.120328","article-title":"Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? A meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials","volume":"84","author":"Monje","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"R3-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12409","article-title":"Early loading of 6 mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface supporting single crowns\u2013A prospective 5-year cohort study","volume":"26","author":"Rossi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R4-20241227","first-page":"545","article-title":"Short implants-a review and clinical update","volume":"39","author":"Chan","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R5-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00434.x","article-title":"Fixed implant-retained rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: 11-year results of a prospective study","volume":"14","author":"Mertens","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"R6-20241227","first-page":"591","article-title":"State of the art of short dental implants: A systematic review of the literature","volume":"23","author":"Neldam","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1165_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:39:22Z","timestamp":1787837962000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1165_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"Suppl 4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1165_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0976-4879","0975-7406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0976-4879","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-7406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-08-30","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-09-08","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}