{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:31:05Z","timestamp":1787841065816,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,5]],"date-time":"2026-01-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767571200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is often used in short surgeries for its easy insertion and minimal invasiveness but successful placement needs reflex suppression and stable vitals. This study compared Fentanyl-Propofol which gives better insertion but may cause hypotension with Fentanyl-Etomidate which maintains hemodynamics but causes more myoclonus.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Material and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I\u2013II patients aged 18\u201360 years were included in this prospective study. Group A got Fentanyl + Propofol. Group B got Fentanyl + Etomidate. We compared attempts, time, ease, vitals, and side effects.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Group A had better insertion, first attempt success 90% versus 60%, time 23.27s versus 80.63s, and ease 96.67% versus 66.67%. Group B showed more myoclonus (43.33%), jaw tightness, and limb movements. Hemodynamics gets better with etomidate.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Fentanyl-Propofol is better for smooth LMA insertion. Etomidate useful in unstable patients but may need caution due to insertion issues.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1246_25","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]],"date-time":"2026-01-06T06:00:23Z","timestamp":1767679223000},"page":"112-114","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Fentanyl and Propofol Versus Fentanyl and Etomidate for the Insertion Conditions of Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Prospective Observational Study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Rashmi","family":"Pal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ankita","family":"Verma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deepali","family":"Valecha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1177\/147323000703500616","article-title":"Remifentanil and etomidate for laryngeal mask airway insertion","volume":"35","author":"Uzun","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Int Med Res"},{"key":"R2-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1468","DOI":"10.18410\/jebmh\/2018\/307","article-title":"Comparison between induction with etomidate, propofol and thiopentone to facilitate i-gel (supraglottic airway device) insertion in elective short surgical procedures","volume":"5","author":"Mohanty","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Evid Based Med Healthc"},{"key":"R3-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000000646","article-title":"Stoelting\u2019s Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice, 5th edition: Stoelting\u2019s Handbook of Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice, 3rd edition","volume":"122","author":"Haydar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R4-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.4236\/ojanes.2012.24036","article-title":"General anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway: Etomidate vs propofol for hemodynamic stability","volume":"2","author":"Ghafoor","year":"2012","journal-title":"Open J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R5-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeg018","article-title":"Propofol requirement for insertion of cuffed oropharyngeal airway versus laryngeal mask airway with and without fentanyl: A dose-finding study","volume":"90","author":"Tanaka","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R6-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0503300211","article-title":"Randomized double-blind comparison of ketamine-propofol, fentanyl-propofol and propofol-saline on haemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions","volume":"33","author":"Goh","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"R7-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1089\/jop.2013.0165","article-title":"Effects of propofol, etomidate and thiopental on intraocular pressure and hemodynamic responses in phacoemulsification by insertion of laryngeal mask airway","volume":"30","author":"Alipour","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Ocul Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"R8-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.76659","article-title":"Randomized double-blind comparison of ketamine-propofol and fentanyl-propofol for the insertion of laryngeal mask airway in children","volume":"27","author":"Singh","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R9-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.76655","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of ketamine - propofol, fentanyl - propofol and butorphanol - propofol on haemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions","volume":"27","author":"Gupta","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R10-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1053\/ajem.2000.18033","article-title":"Etomidate versus succinylcholine for intubation in an air medical setting","volume":"18","author":"Kociszewski","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med"},{"key":"R11-20260330","first-page":"209","article-title":"Improving the success rate of laryngeal mask airway insertion during etomidate induction by using fentanyl or succinylcholine","volume":"42","author":"Liou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan"},{"key":"R12-20260330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1590\/1414-431x20144100","article-title":"Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus during anesthetic induction by pretreatment with dexmedetomidine","volume":"48","author":"Luan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Braz J Med Biol Res"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1246_25","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:39:37Z","timestamp":1787837977000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1246_25"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,5]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1246_25","relation":{},"ISSN":["0976-4879","0975-7406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0976-4879","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-7406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-07-15","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-08-29","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}