{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T11:40:25Z","timestamp":1790163625026,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"Suppl 4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]],"date-time":"2024-10-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730246400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>\n                    A\n                    <jats:sc>BSTRACT<\/jats:sc>\n                  <\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To investigate the accuracy of Complete Arch implant impression digitally and conventionally with and without using a 3D printed modular chain splint.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines were use to conduct an analytical cross-sectional study. The total number of samples (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 40) was derived and was divided into two groups with four subgroups: A1-Digital Impression without splinting of scan bodies (reference scan) and A2-Digital Impression splinted with 3D printed Modular Chain splint (test scan) and B1-Conventional Impression without Splinting of impression copings (reference scan) and B2- Conventional Impression splinted with 3D printed modular chain splint (test scan). In total 40 sample STL files were superimposed. Each analogue were assessed with respect to X, Y and Z axes (X-longitudinal, Y-lateral, and Z-vertical). All the data analysis was performed with SPSS version 22.0 with\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.05 as statistical significance.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There was no significant difference in the mean standard deviation along the X-axis (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &gt; 0.05). The mean standard deviation along with a Y-axis (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &gt; 0.05) also showed no statistical difference whereas along with the Z-axis mean standard deviation (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &gt; 0.05). Along the vertical Z-axis, there was a significant difference in the mean standard deviation in comparison with the horizontal X and Y axes.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There is no significant difference in accuracy of complete arch implant impression when the intraoral digital impression was compared to the traditional impression with or without the use of 3D printed modular splint.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1256_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,27]],"date-time":"2024-12-27T00:03:17Z","timestamp":1735257797000},"page":"S3764-S3767","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital and Conventional Implant Impression as Influenced by the Use of a 3D Printed Modular Splint \u2013An In-Vitro Study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Bhushan S.","family":"Pol","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ajay V.","family":"Sabane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rajashree D.","family":"Jadhav","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pankaj P.","family":"Kadam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arti R.","family":"Gachake","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bhagyashree G.","family":"Kalsekar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20241227","article-title":"The glossary of prosthodontic terms","author":"Ferro"},{"issue":"(Suppl 1)","key":"R2-20241227","first-page":"101","article-title":"Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review","volume":"10","author":"Rutk\u016bnas","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"R3-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(12)60100-0","article-title":"Complete arch implant impression technique","volume":"107","author":"Ma","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"R4-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.12.017","article-title":"Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"116","author":"Chochlidakis","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"R5-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.02.004","article-title":"Complete digital workflow in prosthesis prototype fabrication for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: A technique","volume":"122","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"R6-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2020.04.019","article-title":"Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative analytical cross-sectional study","volume":"126","author":"Waldecker","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"R7-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02219.x","article-title":"Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: An optical scanning study","volume":"23","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R8-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.4035","article-title":"A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses","volume":"27","author":"Hoods-Moonsammy","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"R9-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104072","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104072","article-title":"Accuracy of complete- digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: An analytical cross-sectional study","volume":"119","author":"Pozzi","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"R10-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12695","article-title":"Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: A comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit","volume":"27","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R11-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.3390\/app13010538","article-title":"Clinical reliability of complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by narrow-diameter implants to support complete-arch restorations","volume":"13","author":"Lorenzi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Appl. Sci"},{"key":"R12-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.4103\/jips.jips_379_19","article-title":"Assessment of intraoral scanning technology for multiple implant impressions\u2014A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Kachhara","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Indian Prosthodont Soc"},{"key":"R13-20241227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.06.001","article-title":"Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized analytical cross-sectional trial","volume":"64","author":"Arcuri","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"key":"R14-20241227","first-page":"9","article-title":"In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions","volume":"46","author":"Ender","year":"2015","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1256_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:40:42Z","timestamp":1786650042000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1256_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"Suppl 4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_1256_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0976-4879","0975-7406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0976-4879","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-7406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-09-06","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-09-16","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}