{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:39:07Z","timestamp":1787841547075,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"Suppl 3","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>\n                    A\n                    <jats:sc>BSTRACT<\/jats:sc>\n                  <\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>After face trauma, orbital floor fractures are often experienced, leading to both functional and cosmetic deficits. There are several methods for reconstructing the orbital floor, such as iliac bone grafting and metal mesh. There are not many comparison studies available, nevertheless, to help surgeons choose the best method.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Fifty patients with orbital floor fractures were enrolled in this prospective, randomized clinical investigation. They were randomly allocated to receive either an iliac bone transplant (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 25) or metal mesh (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 25). Over the course of six months, postoperative complications such as diplopia and enophthalmos were assessed regularly. A statistical study was conducted to compare the two groups\u2019 results.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There was no discernible difference in postoperative complications between the two groups when it came to the reconstruction of orbital floor fractures using either metal mesh or iliac bone transplant. In contrast to the metal mesh group, the iliac bone graft group did, however, exhibit a somewhat decreased incidence of diplopia and enophthalmos.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In conclusion, metal mesh and iliac bone graft are both reliable methods for reconstructing the orbital floor, and their rates of surgical complications are similar. However, there could be little benefit to iliac bone grafting in terms of lower rates of enophthalmos and diplopia. Based on the preferences of the surgeon and patient-specific criteria, the procedure should be selected individually.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_385_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,2]],"date-time":"2024-08-02T02:25:13Z","timestamp":1722565513000},"page":"S2637-S2639","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison between Metal Mesh and Iliac Bonegraft in the Reconstruction of Orbital Floor Fracture\u2014A Clinical Study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"B. Pavan","family":"Kumar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, Nalgonda, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M. Rahul","family":"Chowdary","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, Nalgonda, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vedant R.","family":"Brahme","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, Nalgonda, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V. Vidya","family":"Devi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, Nalgonda, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sushma","family":"Kupendra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, HKDET\u2019S Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Humnabad, Karnataka, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rishabh","family":"Bhanot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Jyoti Kendra General Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alok","family":"Dubey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.3390\/medicines9010006","article-title":"The dilemma of reconstructive material choice for orbital floor fracture: A narrative review","volume":"9","author":"Sivam","year":"2022","journal-title":"Medicines (Basel)"},{"key":"R2-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1007\/s12663-019-01207-y","article-title":"Navigation-assisted orbital trauma reconstruction using a bioactive osteoconductive\/bioresorbable u-HA\/PLLA system","volume":"18","author":"Kanno","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Maxillofac Oral Surg"},{"key":"R3-20240829","first-page":"e13223","article-title":"Conchal cartilage in surgical reconstruction of orbital floor fracture","volume":"13","author":"Vaanmugil","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"R4-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1007\/s12070-019-01724-9","article-title":"A comparative study of orbital blow out fracture repair, using autogenous bone graft and alloplastic materials","volume":"71","author":"Saha","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"R5-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1570075","article-title":"Delayed periorbital abscess after silicone implant to orbital floor fracture","volume":"9","author":"Dedhia","year":"2016","journal-title":"Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr"},{"key":"R6-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1651514","article-title":"Orbital floor reconstruction: A comparison of outcomes between absorbable and permanent implant systems","volume":"12","author":"Polacco","year":"2019","journal-title":"Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr"},{"key":"R7-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2020.09.019","article-title":"Assessment of a consecutive series of orbital floor fracture repairs with the hess area ratio and the use of unsintered hydroxyapatite particles\/poly l-lactide composite sheets for orbital fracture reconstruction","volume":"79","author":"Watanabe","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"R8-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1664","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000003730","article-title":"Analysis of orbital volume measurements following reduction and internal fixation using absorbable mesh plates and screws for patients with orbital floor blowout fractures","volume":"28","author":"Hwang","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"issue":"(Suppl 1)","key":"R9-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S242","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_702_21","article-title":"Factors affecting quality of life in zygomatic fractures: An Original Research","volume":"14","author":"Mishra","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Pharm Bioallied Sci"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_385_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:59:59Z","timestamp":1787839199000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_385_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"references-count":9,"journal-issue":{"issue":"Suppl 3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_385_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["0976-4879","0975-7406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0976-4879","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-7406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-04-06","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-04-14","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}