{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T16:33:48Z","timestamp":1787762028496,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"Suppl 1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>\n                    A\n                    <jats:sc>BSTRACT<\/jats:sc>\n                  <\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of the present study was to comparatively assess the cleansing efficiency of dissimilar rotary files in deciduous teeth.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Forty-five deciduous anterior teeth that had been subjected to extraction were chosen for this research. The teeth were included if they had a minimum of 2\/3\n                      <jats:sup>rd<\/jats:sup>\n                      undamaged root portions. Coronal entr\u00e9e was completed using round diamond burs. All 45 samples were allocated at random to one of the following three groups: Group I: Control group in which the radicular canal was not subjected to any form of instrumentation, Group II: The radicular canal was subjected to instrumentation employing rotary ProTaper files, Group III: The radicular canal was subjected to instrumentation with rotary MTwo files. The samples were subjected to immersion in a succession of diluted ethyl alcohols to permit dehydration: With a change of solution every eight hours, the first 16 hours were spent in 70% alcohol, followed by eight hours in 80% alcohol, eight hours in 95% alcohol, and eight hours in 100% alcohol. The samples thus subjected to dehydration were cleared by immersion in methyl salicylate for six hours. Under a stereomicroscope with a 10x magnification, the root canals were examined by a person who was blinded to the groups in order to look for any traces of ink in the coronal, middle, and apical third of the canals.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In the control group, greater residual remains were present in the apical 3\n                      <jats:sup>rd<\/jats:sup>\n                      at 2.16 \u00b1 0.08 followed by the coronal 3\n                      <jats:sup>rd<\/jats:sup>\n                      at 2.02 \u00b1 0.14, and then in the middle 3\n                      <jats:sup>rd<\/jats:sup>\n                      at 1.88 \u00b1 0.10. While using the ProTaper files, greater residual remains were present in the middle portion at 1.68 \u00b1 0.16, followed by the coronal third at 0.94 \u00b1 0.09, then the apical third at 0.98 \u00b1 0.22. Greater residual remains were again noted with the MTwo files in the mid-portion at 1.44 \u00b1 0.18, followed by the coronal part at 0.86 \u00b1 0.10 and then the apical part at 0.82 \u00b1 0.04. Differences among these groups were statistically significant with a\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      value &lt; 0.001.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The present study concluded that either of the file types used exhibited reasonably lower remnant score values in the apical third versus the middle\/coronal thirds. Nonetheless, MTwo type files delineated superior capacity at removing debris versus the ProTaper file types at the apical level.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_569_22","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,12]],"date-time":"2023-07-12T02:07:24Z","timestamp":1689127644000},"page":"S442-S446","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy of Different Rotary Files in Primary Teeth\u2014An In vitro Study"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Adel S.","family":"Alqarni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.14748\/sssp.v5i1.6557","article-title":"Endodontic treatment and premature tooth loss in primary dentition. Reasons and distribution","volume":"5","author":"Georgieva","year":"2019","journal-title":"Scripta Scientifica Salutis Publicae"},{"key":"R2-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2591.2007.01366.x","article-title":"Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth","volume":"41","author":"Leonardo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Endod J"},{"key":"R3-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.4103\/0976-237X.205064","article-title":"In vitro comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy and volumetric filling in primary molars:Cone beam computed tomography evaluation","volume":"8","author":"Deshpande","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Dent"},{"key":"R4-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2591.2000.00339.x","article-title":"An overview of nickel\u2013titanium alloys used in dentistry","volume":"33","author":"Thompson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int Endod J"},{"key":"R5-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.17796\/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576","article-title":"Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth","volume":"32","author":"Crespo","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"R6-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joen.2011.02.030","article-title":"Comparison of two techniques for assessing the shaping efficacy of repeatedly used nickel\u2013titanium rotary instruments","volume":"37","author":"Ounsi","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Endod"},{"key":"R7-20240829","first-page":"453","article-title":"Use of nickel\u2013titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth","volume":"21","author":"Barr","year":"1999","journal-title":"Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"R8-20240829","first-page":"77","article-title":"Use of nickel\u2013titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth","volume":"22","author":"Barr","year":"2000","journal-title":"Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"R9-20240829","first-page":"10","article-title":"Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars","volume":"1","author":"Kuo","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Dent Sci"},{"key":"R10-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joen.2009.11.015","article-title":"Comparison of three techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals","volume":"36","author":"Taha","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Endod"},{"key":"R11-20240829","first-page":"123","article-title":"A comparative scanning electron microscope investigation of cleanliness of root canals using hand k-flexofiles, rotary race and k3 instruments","volume":"3","author":"Rahimi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Iran Endod J"},{"key":"R12-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.4103\/0976-237X.132330","article-title":"Cleaning capacity of hybrid instrumentation technique using reamer with alternating cutting edges system files:Histological analysis","volume":"5","author":"J\u00fanior","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Dent"},{"key":"R13-20240829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/S0099-2399(97)80410-4","article-title":"Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments:A comparative SEM investigation","volume":"23","author":"H\u00fclsmann","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Endod"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_569_22","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T16:12:04Z","timestamp":1787760724000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_569_22"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"Suppl 1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_569_22","relation":{},"ISSN":["0976-4879","0975-7406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0976-4879","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-7406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-11-10","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-12-31","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}