{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T02:47:48Z","timestamp":1790563668691,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"Suppl 1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There are many different types of malocclusions that may result from the sagittal, vertical, or transverse deviations in normal craniofacial development. When it comes to orthodontic problems, malocclusions in the sagittal plane may have a considerable impact on a person's self-esteem as well as their ability to speak and eat properly. Sagittal anomalies in the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue systems may now be accurately diagnosed using a universally accepted standard lateral cephalogram (SLCE).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods and Materials:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The principal investigator manually traced the cephalograms, identified skeletal landmarks, and measured the following data. The ANB angle (normal range: 0\u00b0 to 4\u00b0) is the angle framed by the point A, Nasion, and B. Estimated oppositely from point A and B on the functional occlusal plane, with Wits evaluation: AO-to-BO direct distance. AB plane angle : the angle formed by the AB and the Npog plane (normal range = -9\u00b0 to 0\u00b0). Beta angle: the angle framed by the A-CB and AB lines, with a typical range of 27\u00b0 to 35\u00b0. W angle: this is the angle created by the opposite line from M to the S-G line and the M-G line, with a typical range of 51 to 55 degrees. The angle of convexity: the angle between N-point A and A-Pog. (Normal range: -8.5 to 10 degree)<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We utilised Pearson correlation to see how well the different skeletal studies correlated with one another. Wits and the ANB angle of convexity exhibited an excellent relationship with each other, with\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">r<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.831 and Downs angle of convexity (both\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">r<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.823 and\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.01) being statistically significant. This study used Kappa statistics to assess the degree of agreement between several cephalometric diagnostic criteria. The agreement between the ANB and final groups was strong (k = 0.802,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.01).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There was a strong link between all of the cephalometric measures. The cephalometric landmark and valid indication was determined to be the most dependable in evaluating malocclusion and development pattern.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_6_22","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]],"date-time":"2022-07-13T15:05:34Z","timestamp":1657724734000},"page":"S808-S811","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["To Check the Reliability of Various Cephalometric Parameters used for Predicting the Type of Malocclusions and Growth Patterns"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Ranjit Omprakash","family":"Pawar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Aditya Dental College and Hospital, Beed, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dipali Raghunath","family":"Mane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Aditya Dental College and Hospital, Beed, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chetan Dilip","family":"Patil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Yogita Dental College and Hospital, Khed, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Snehal Vijay","family":"Bhalerao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Yogita Dental College and Hospital, Khed, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aameer Fazluddin","family":"Parkar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Yogita Dental College and Hospital, Khed, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shivam","family":"Agarwal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dr. H.S.R.S.M. Dental College and Hospital, Hingoli, Maharashtra, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"R2-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1620\/tjem.214.39","article-title":"Beneficial effects of orthodontic treatment on quality of life in patients with malocclusion","volume":"214","author":"Azuma","year":"2008","journal-title":"Tohoku J Exp Med"},{"key":"R3-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.2319\/030307-111.1","article-title":"Impacts on daily performances attributed to malocclusions using the condition-specific feature of the oral impacts on Daily Performances Index","volume":"78","author":"Bernab\u00e9","year":"2008","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"R4-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.09.021","article-title":"How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning","volume":"139","author":"Devereux","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R5-20250925","first-page":"93","article-title":"A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia the introduction of cephalometric radiography","volume":"51","author":"Broadbent","year":"1981","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"R6-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(48)90015-3","article-title":"Variations in facial relationships their significance in treatment and prognosis","volume":"34","author":"Downs","year":"1948","journal-title":"Am J Orthod"},{"key":"R7-20250925","first-page":"142","article-title":"The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion","volume":"22","author":"Riedel","year":"1952","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"R8-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(53)90082-7","article-title":"Cephalometrics for you and me","volume":"39","author":"Steiner","year":"1953","journal-title":"Am J Orthod"},{"key":"R9-20250925","first-page":"162","article-title":"Adjusting ANB angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position","volume":"51","author":"Freeman","year":"1981","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"R10-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(75)90065-2","article-title":"The Wits appraisal of jaw disharmony","volume":"67","author":"Jacobson","year":"1975","journal-title":"Am J Orthod"},{"key":"R11-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(95)70108-7","article-title":"The reproducibility and repeatability of the Wits analysis","volume":"107","author":"Haynes","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R12-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2003.08.026","article-title":"A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: The beta angle","volume":"126","author":"Baik","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"R13-20250925","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjr001","article-title":"A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia the W Angle","volume":"35","author":"Bhad","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_6_22","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:42:05Z","timestamp":1787067725000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_6_22"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"Suppl 1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_6_22","relation":{},"ISSN":["0976-4879","0975-7406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0976-4879","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-7406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-01-03","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-02-13","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}