{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:22:02Z","timestamp":1787840522707,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"Suppl 5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761696000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"\n A\n BSTRACT<\/jats:sc>\n <\/jats:title>\n \n Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy, procedural efficiency, and patient satisfaction between traditional and digital impression techniques utilized in full mouth rehabilitation.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods:<\/jats:title>\n \n A randomized clinical trial involving 40 patients requiring full mouth rehabilitation was conducted. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: traditional impression group (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n = 20) using polyvinyl siloxane, and digital impression group (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n = 20) utilizing intraoral scanners. Inclusion criteria were adults requiring full mouth restoration without systemic diseases affecting oral conditions. Exclusion criteria included severe periodontal disease, pregnancy, and unwillingness to participate. Parameters assessed included marginal fit (\u03bcm), accuracy (surface deviation analysis), procedural efficiency (procedure duration), and patient comfort using a visual analogue scale (VAS).\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n \n Digital impressions showed significantly superior marginal fit accuracy (digital: 24.5 \u00b1 3.8 \u03bcm; traditional: 43.2 \u00b1 5.7 \u03bcm;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < .001), precision (surface deviation: digital: 19.8 \u00b1 4.2 \u03bcm; traditional: 37.4 \u00b1 6.1 \u03bcm;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < .001), and procedural efficiency (digital: 12.6 \u00b1 2.4 mins; traditional: 25.8 \u00b1 3.9 mins;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < .001). Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the digital impression group (VAS: digital: 8.6 \u00b1 1.2; traditional: 6.1 \u00b1 1.4;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < .001).\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n Digital impressions provided superior accuracy, efficiency, and patient satisfaction compared to traditional methods, making digital techniques preferable for full mouth rehabilitation. Clinicians can confidently adopt digital impression technology, enhancing procedural accuracy, efficiency, and patient comfort, significantly impacting treatment quality in comprehensive dental restorations.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_724_25","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T10:26:14Z","timestamp":1761733574000},"page":"S3695-S3697","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Evaluation of Accuracy of Traditional and Digital Impression Techniques in Full Mouth Rehabilitation: An Original Research"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Faizan R.","family":"Dar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ravi Kumar","family":"Pabbati","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Srilatha","family":"Pabbati","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry, Taif Specialized Dental Center, Taif, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.V","family":"Deepti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Thaimoogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Souhardya","family":"Roy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Intern, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubneswar, Odhisha, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Puneet","family":"Ajwani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Santosh Dental College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2016.10.019","article-title":"Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients'preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material","volume":"118","author":"Sakornwimon","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"R2-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cden.2017.06.004","article-title":"Dental impression materials and techniques","volume":"61","author":"Punj","year":"2017","journal-title":"Dent Clin North Am"},{"key":"R3-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cden.2007.03.006","article-title":"Impression materials: A comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry","volume":"51","author":"Rubel","year":"2007","journal-title":"Dent Clin North Am"},{"key":"R4-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1590\/0103-6440201302334","article-title":"Dimensional accuracy of stone casts made from silicone-based impression materials and three impression techniques","volume":"24","author":"Vitti","year":"2013","journal-title":"Braz Dent J"},{"key":"R5-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12527","article-title":"Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A review","volume":"27","author":"Ahlholm","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"R6-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.12.017","article-title":"Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"116","author":"Chochlidakis","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"R7-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-017-0442-x","article-title":"Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature","volume":"17","author":"Mangano","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"R8-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12218","article-title":"Intraoral digital impression technique: A review","volume":"24","author":"Ting-Shu","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"R9-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-018-0580-9","article-title":"A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions","volume":"18","author":"Albdour","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"R10-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6831-14-10","article-title":"Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: Evaluation of patients'perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes","volume":"14","author":"Yuzbasioglu","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"R11-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12234","article-title":"Patients'preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (intraoral scan) of dental implants","volume":"25","author":"Wismeijer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"R12-20260217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2014.07.023","article-title":"Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance","volume":"146","author":"Gr\u00fcnheid","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_724_25","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:24:25Z","timestamp":1787837065000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_724_25"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"Suppl 5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jpbs.jpbs_724_25","relation":{},"ISSN":["0976-4879","0975-7406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0976-4879","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-7406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-03-14","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-04-26","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}