{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T08:44:45Z","timestamp":1792226685495,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"abstract":"\n Background:<\/jats:title>\n Invention of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has opened new windows for patients under dialysis due to its fewer time requirement and being ambulatory in comparison to hemodialysis. Open surgery and laparoscopic technique have been utilized for peritoneal catheter embedding; however, data about the superior technique are controversial. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of open surgery versus laparoscopic technique and compare their complications in those with survival of over and less than a year in patients who need PD for the first time.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 121 cases admitted for PD. Patients were randomly divided into two groups undergoing either open or laparoscopic surgery for embedding PD catheter. Patients\u2019 demographics, as well as PD function and complications, were followed for a 12-month duration and compared between the two groups.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n \n Catheter survival for over 12 months occurred in 39 patients (65%) underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 45 (73.8%) patients underwent open surgery (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.09). Complications, including catheter obstruction, leak, abdominal hernia, and peritonitis, were not statistically different between the two techniques over 12 months of survival (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n > 0.05). Complications among the catheters with less than a year survival, including obstruction, leak, catheter displacement, hernia, and peritonitis, were not significantly different comparing open surgery with laparoscopic technique (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n > 0.05).\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n Considering complications, PD catheter implantation through laparoscopic surgery was not statistically different from open surgery, neither for those with less than 12 months of survival nor for those with over a year.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/jrms.jrms_1097_18","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,30]],"date-time":"2019-09-30T02:16:49Z","timestamp":1569809809000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Comparison of the complications of open surgery versus laparoscopic technique in insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Morteza","family":"Shahbandari","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alireza","family":"Amiran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2007.01.017","article-title":"The early history of dialysis for chronic renal failure in the United States: A view from seattle","volume":"49","author":"Blagg","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Kidney Dis"},{"key":"R2-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.3747\/pdi.2017.00023","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing open versus laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter and outcomes: The CAPD I trial","volume":"38","author":"van Laanen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Perit Dial Int"},{"key":"R3-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2008.10.019","article-title":"Effective use of laparoscopy for long-term peritoneal dialysis access","volume":"198","author":"Crabtree","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"R4-20250828","first-page":"78","article-title":"Comparison of malnutrition in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients and its relationship with echocardiographic findings","volume":"21","author":"Naini","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Res Med Sci"},{"key":"R5-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1159\/000184860","article-title":"Complications with permanent peritoneal dialysis catheters: Experience with 154 percutaneously placed catheters","volume":"48","author":"Allon","year":"1988","journal-title":"Nephron"},{"key":"R6-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1177\/089686089901900415","article-title":"Randomized prospective comparison of laparoscopic and open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion","volume":"19","author":"Wright","year":"1999","journal-title":"Perit Dial Int"},{"key":"R7-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1749","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-002-8586-3","article-title":"Laparoscopic omental fixation technique versus open surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters","volume":"17","author":"O\u01e7\u00fcn\u00e7","year":"2003","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R8-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-004-8156-y","article-title":"Comparison of open and laparoscopic secure placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters","volume":"19","author":"Soontrapornchai","year":"2005","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R9-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2007.08.038","article-title":"Peritoneal dialysis catheters: Laparoscopic versus traditional placement techniques and outcomes","volume":"194","author":"Gajjar","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"R10-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2008.09.008","article-title":"Prospective randomized study for comparison of open surgery with laparoscopic-assisted placement of tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter \u2013 A single center experience and literature review","volume":"159","author":"Jwo","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"R11-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4297-4","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter placement","volume":"30","author":"Cox","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"R12-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.3747\/pdi.2012.00119","article-title":"Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection","volume":"33","author":"Blake","year":"2013","journal-title":"Perit Dial Int"},{"key":"R13-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1177\/000313480507100209","article-title":"A laparoscopic method for optimal peritoneal dialysis access","volume":"71","author":"Crabtree","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"R14-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1097\/00129689-200008000-00007","article-title":"Laparoscopic placement of the tenckhoff catheter for peritoneal dialysis","volume":"10","author":"Tsimoyiannis","year":"2000","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"R15-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2369-13-69","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Xie","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Nephrol"},{"key":"R16-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e56351","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0056351","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: A meta-analysis","volume":"8","author":"Hagen","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"R17-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000188","article-title":"The survival and complication rates of laparoscopic versus open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: A meta-analysis","volume":"25","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"R18-20250828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"838","DOI":"10.3109\/0886022X.2015.1077313","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus traditional peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: A meta analysis","volume":"38","author":"Qiao","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ren Fail"}],"container-title":["Journal of Research in Medical Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01222967-201924000-00085","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:31:13Z","timestamp":1787837473000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01222967-201924000-00085"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jrms.jrms_1097_18","relation":{},"ISSN":["1735-1995","1735-7136"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1735-1995","type":"print"},{"value":"1735-7136","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2019-02-07","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2019-09-07","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}