{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T19:29:39Z","timestamp":1786649379055,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754006400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>When surgical intervention is required for lumbar disc herniation, microdiscectomy is frequently employed. Although sequestrectomy has been compared in several aspects, there is limited evidence regarding clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical effectiveness of both techniques by focusing on their postoperative results.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of sequestrectomy and microdiscectomy with sequestrectomy in patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation, focusing on postoperative pain relief and functional recovery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 110 patients of any age or gender who had been surgically treated in our clinic for clinically and radiologically confirmed single-level lumbar disc herniation were included. Patients were recorded as having undergone sequestrectomy or discectomy with sequestrectomy, with no significant missing data in preoperative imaging and epicrisis documents. Patients with stabilization procedures, previous surgical history at the same level, or those who had undergone far lateral discectomy were excluded. Postoperative clinical outcomes were analyzed according to the surgical methods employed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In patients who underwent sequestrectomy and those who received microsurgical combined sequestrectomy, the postoperative leg pain visual analog scale scores were determined to be 2.51 \u00b1 0.73 (median: 2.00) and 2.38 \u00b1 0.63 (median: 2.00), respectively. No significant difference was observed between the groups (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      : 1.01;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      : 0.32). Both groups exhibited a statistically significant decrease in leg pain over time. The Cohen\u2019s\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d<\/jats:italic>\n                      value in the sequestrectomy group was higher than that in the microsurgical group, indicating a greater effect size for pain reduction over time in the sequestrectomy cohort.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our study suggests that patients undergoing sequestrectomy achieve better pain control over time, particularly in terms of radiculopathy. We believe that sequestrectomy may be more appropriate for younger patients to preserve disc height and tissue.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/njcp.njcp_103_25","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]],"date-time":"2025-08-30T11:00:26Z","timestamp":1756551626000},"page":"988-993","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of the Results of Microsurgical Techniques in Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Analysis"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"MO","family":"Y\u00fcksel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Besnek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Yeditepe Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"NU","family":"Unl\u00fc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B","family":"Erdo\u011fan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Sanl\u0131urfa Training and Research Hospital, \u015eanhurfa, Turkiye"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200403000-00006","article-title":"Low back pain: Pathophysiology and management","volume":"12","author":"Biyani","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"R2-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198365020-00010","article-title":"Risk factors in low-back pain. An epidemiological survey","volume":"65","author":"Frymoyer","year":"1983","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"R3-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2451","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.296.20.2451","article-title":"Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort","volume":"296","author":"Weinstein","year":"2006","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R4-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2005.2.3.0271","article-title":"Outcome after lumbar sequestrectomy compared with microdiscectomy: A prospective randomized study","volume":"2","author":"Thome","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"R5-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200301000-00016","article-title":"Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: The effects of fragment type and anular competence","volume":"85","author":"Carragee","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"R6-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198901000-00002","article-title":"Loose cartilage from intervertebral disk simulating tumor of the spinal cord. By Walter E. Dandy, 1929","volume":"238","author":"Dandy","year":"1989","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"R8-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-197806000-00015","article-title":"Microlumbar discectomy: A conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc","volume":"3","author":"Williams","year":"1978","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"R9-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1590\/S0102-36162010000100004","article-title":"Lumbar disc herniation","volume":"45","author":"Vialle","year":"2010","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ortop"},{"issue":"1 Suppl","key":"R10-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2012.11.005","article-title":"Surgical discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical techniques","volume":"99","author":"Blamoutier","year":"2013","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"R11-20260421","first-page":"1047","article-title":"Trend of the incidence of lumbar disc herniation: Decreasing with aging in the elderly","volume":"8","author":"Ma","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Interv Aging"},{"key":"R12-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2024.09.007","article-title":"Discectomy versus sequestrectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"25","author":"Ambrosio","year":"2025","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"R13-20260421","first-page":"329","article-title":"Long-term outcome of 104 patients after lumbar sequestrectomy according to Williams","volume":"49","author":"Wenger","year":"2001","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"R14-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200103150-00024","article-title":"Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Results of operative management","volume":"26","author":"Suk","year":"2001","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R15-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00298565","article-title":"Role of peridural fibrosis in the failed back: A review","volume":"5","author":"Robertson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"R16-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1237379","article-title":"Prospective comparative study of lumbar sequestrectomy and microdiscectomy","volume":"52","author":"Schick","year":"2009","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"key":"R17-20260421","first-page":"22","article-title":"The treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Simple fragment excision versus disc space curettage","volume":"4","author":"Balderston","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord"},{"key":"R18-20260421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2259","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2378-9","article-title":"Driving reaction time before and after surgery for lumbar disc herniation in patients with radiculopathy","volume":"21","author":"Thaler","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"}],"container-title":["Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/njcp.njcp_103_25","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T18:53:22Z","timestamp":1786647202000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/njcp.njcp_103_25"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/njcp.njcp_103_25","relation":{},"ISSN":["1119-3077","2229-7731"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1119-3077","type":"print"},{"value":"2229-7731","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-02-22","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-06-25","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}