{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T15:23:37Z","timestamp":1787757817745,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Comparison of the use of I-gel and Laringeal Mask Airway (LMA) Protector in laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding the time and ease of insertion for supraglottic airway devices (SAD) and gastric tube (GT), airway sealing capacity, and postoperative complications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Sixty-four American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I\u2013III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. After anesthesia induction, LMA Protector was inserted in Group LPRO (LMA Protector) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 33) and I-gel was inserted in Group IGEL (I-gel) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 31) patients. Time of SAD insertion, number of attempts, time, and ease of GT insertion were recorded. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) were measured at the time of SAD insertion, 10 min after insertion, 10 min after pneumoperitoneum, and just before the termination of pneumoperitoneum. The presence of bloodstains on SAD, sore throat, hoarseness, nausea, and pain in swallowing was assessed postoperatively. A\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      value of &lt; 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Result:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Two patients in Group LPRO needed endotracheal intubation and were excluded from the study. The SAD insertion time was shorter in Group IGEL than in Group LPRO (13 \u00b1 7.4 s vs. 18.8 \u00b1 9.8 s). The number of attempts and success rate on the first attempt were similar in both groups. GT insertion time was shorter in Group IGEL than Group LPRO (11 \u00b1 7.7 s vs. 21 \u00b1 11 s). The insertion of GT was easier in Group IGEL. The OLP levels decreased during the pneumoperitoneum in Group LPRO while they remained constant in Group IGEL.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We observed that I-gel offers more stable airway sealing and easier GT insertion advantages when compared with LMA Protector in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/njcp.njcp_693_20","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,19]],"date-time":"2022-01-19T07:38:30Z","timestamp":1642577910000},"page":"90-96","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Comparison of I-gel and LMA Protector in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"DE","family":"Ar\u0131","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Abita\u011fao\u011flu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C","family":"K\u00f6ksal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131mAr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D","family":"Emrem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"\u00dcst\u00fcn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2018.12.044","article-title":"Comparison of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscpic surgeries: A network analysis","volume":"55","author":"Yoon","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R2-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.4240\/wjgs.v7.i11.319","article-title":"Role of laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic cholecytectomy","volume":"7","author":"Belena","year":"2015","journal-title":"World J Gastrintest Surg"},{"key":"R3-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0000000000000262","article-title":"Laryngeal mask airway indications: New frontiers for second generation supraglottic airways","volume":"28","author":"Timmermann","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R4-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.12968\/hmed.2008.69.5.29371","article-title":"Are supraglottic airways a sefe alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic surgeries?","volume":"69","author":"Thompson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Hosp Med"},{"key":"R5-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-019-0785-8","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector\u2122 and i-gel\u2122 in paralyzed, anesthetized patients","volume":"19","author":"Chang","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R6-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-017-0323-5","article-title":"A preliminary assessment of the LMA Protector\u2122 in non-paralysed patients","volume":"17","author":"Sng","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R7-15-20240907","first-page":"45","article-title":"LMA protector airway: First experience with a new second generation laryngeal mask","volume":"85","author":"Eckardt","year":"2019","journal-title":"Minerva Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R8-15-20240907","first-page":"e2020016","article-title":"Insertion of four different types of supraglottic airway devices by emergency nurses. A mannequin-based simulation study","volume":"91","author":"Liti","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"key":"R9-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.14475","article-title":"Fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation through i-gel and LMA Protector supraglottic airway devices-a randomised comparison","volume":"74","author":"Mendonca","year":"2019","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R10-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.74583","article-title":"PLMA vs. I-gel: A comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"26","author":"Sharma","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"R11-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.4097\/kja.19195","article-title":"Comparison of clinical performance of I-gel and Baska Mask during laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"72","author":"Choi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R12-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1082","DOI":"10.15537\/smj.2018.11.22346","article-title":"AuraGain and I-Gel laryngeal masks in general anesthesia for laparoscpic cholecytectomy. Performance characteristics and effects on hemodynamics","volume":"39","author":"Sabuncu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"R13-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.4103\/0259-1162.159771","article-title":"Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel\u2122 and Proseal LMA\u2122 in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"9","author":"Mishra","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anesth Essays Res"},{"key":"R14-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e16022","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000016022","article-title":"Comparison of early postoperative recovery between laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"98","author":"Kang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore"},{"key":"R15-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.4103\/0259-1162.172336","article-title":"I-gel may be the device of choice for controlled ventilation in patients with hemophilia undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery","volume":"1","author":"Sen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Anesth Essays Res"},{"key":"R16-15-20240907","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1007\/s10029-017-1586-y","article-title":"A randomized clinical study on postoperative pain comparingbetween the supraglottic airway device and endotracheal tubingin transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP)","volume":"21","author":"Nagahisa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hernia"}],"container-title":["Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/njcp.njcp_693_20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T14:54:25Z","timestamp":1787756065000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/njcp.njcp_693_20"}},"subtitle":["A Randomized Controlled Trial"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/njcp.njcp_693_20","relation":{},"ISSN":["1119-3077"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1119-3077","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}}}