{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T19:26:42Z","timestamp":1787772402142,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>BACKGROUND:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured in three different kinds of participants such as healthy subjects (HS), keratoconus patients (KP), and those who underwent myopic photorefractive keratectomy (MPRK). The devices used in this study are the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT), the dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the ocular response analyzer (ORA), and the Corvis ST (CST).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>SUBJECTS AND METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This research included 92 eyes of 92 h, 63 eyes of 63 KP, and 58 eyes of 58 MPRKM. Each participant underwent a complete ophthalmic evaluation and IOP measurement with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST. A statistical analysis was conducted to detect possible differences and correlations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>First, according to the observed data, HS eyes displayed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST, respectively, 15.82 \u00b1 2.74 mmHg, 17.63 \u00b1 2.28 mmHg, 16.24 \u00b1 3.14 mmHg, and 17.31 \u00b1 3.21 mmHg. Then, KP eyes showed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST of, respectively, 14.89 \u00b1 1.64 mmHg, 16.97 \u00b1 2.08 mmHg, 13.09 \u00b1 3.12 mmHg, and 13.78 \u00b1 2.11 mmHg. Finally, MPRK eyes showed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST of, respectively, 13.92 \u00b1 1.34 mmHg, 15.39 \u00b1 2.86 mmHg, 16.63 \u00b1 2.51 mmHg, and 15.06 \u00b1 1.56 mmHg.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSION:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>According to the observed data, ORA and GAT might be used interchangeably in HS, whereas GAT, ORA, and CST in KP eyes. Moreover, it has been noticed that in those eyes that previously undergone a myopic PRK, GAT provided lower values of IOP in comparison with other devices.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ojo.ojo_147_21","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]],"date-time":"2024-05-24T13:49:17Z","timestamp":1716558557000},"page":"315-320","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of IOP obtained in different kind of eyes with contact and no contact tonometers"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Sandro","family":"Sbordone","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adele","family":"Ragucci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gennarfrancesco","family":"Iaccarino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gabriele","family":"Scognamiglio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angelo","family":"Leone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ugo Antonello","family":"Gironi Carnevale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michele","family":"Lanza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2005.081224","article-title":"The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020","volume":"90","author":"Quigley","year":"2006","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R2-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2007.08.010","article-title":"Factors associated with intraocular pressure before and during 9 years of treatment in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study","volume":"115","author":"Musch","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R3-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1779","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(01)00760-6","article-title":"Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)","volume":"108","author":"Brandt","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R4-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0039-6257(93)90053-A","article-title":"Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers","volume":"38","author":"Whitacre","year":"1993","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R5-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5337","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.06-0557","article-title":"Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer","volume":"47","author":"Kotecha","year":"2006","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R7-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2011.03.018","article-title":"Adjusting intraocular pressure for central corneal thickness does not improve prediction models for primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"119","author":"Brandt","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R8-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ijg.0000176936.16015.4e","article-title":"Dynamic contour tonometry: Presentation of a new tonometer","volume":"14","author":"Kanngiesser","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R9-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e31816224bd","article-title":"Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes","volume":"17","author":"Lanza","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R10-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.10.044","article-title":"Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer","volume":"31","author":"Luce","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R11-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748671","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/748671","article-title":"Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with Scheimpflug based device in healthy eyes and diseased ones","volume":"2014","author":"Lanza","year":"2014","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"R12-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-10984","article-title":"A new tonometer \u2013 The Corvis ST tonometer: Clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers","volume":"54","author":"Hong","year":"2013","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R13-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2014.10.002","article-title":"Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with a Scheimpflug based device","volume":"38","author":"Lanza","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cont Lens Anterior Eye"},{"key":"R14-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20071101-05","article-title":"Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with Orbscan and Pentacam","volume":"23","author":"Rosa","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R15-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.120.6.701","article-title":"The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"120","author":"Kass","year":"2002","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R16-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1268","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.120.10.1268","article-title":"Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial","volume":"120","author":"Heijl","year":"2002","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R17-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(00)00538-9","article-title":"The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators","volume":"130","author":"The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS):","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R18-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1097\/00055735-200304000-00010","article-title":"Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: A summary of results to date","volume":"14","author":"Feiner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R19-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4410","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.06-0158","article-title":"Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements","volume":"47","author":"Martinez-de-la-Casa","year":"2006","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R20-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2009.09.020","article-title":"Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers","volume":"117","author":"Kotecha","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R21-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2009.165142","article-title":"Test-retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: A multicentre study","volume":"94","author":"Fogagnolo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R22-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.11.034","article-title":"Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry before and after cataract surgery","volume":"38","author":"Heinrich","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R23-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e31820275b4","article-title":"IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals","volume":"21","author":"Ito","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R24-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1410","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2013-303400","article-title":"Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma","volume":"97","author":"Reznicek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R25-11-20240908","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2014.11.001","article-title":"Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes","volume":"38","author":"Lanza","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cont Lens Anterior Eye"}],"container-title":["Oman Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ojo.ojo_147_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T18:44:27Z","timestamp":1787769867000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ojo.ojo_147_21"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ojo.ojo_147_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["0974-620X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0974-620X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9]]}}}