{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:36:24Z","timestamp":1787841384142,"version":"build-2784847793"},"update-to":[{"DOI":"10.4103\/1658-354x.334743","type":"retraction","label":"Retraction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000}}],"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Tracheal intubation using the 2\n                      <jats:sup>nd<\/jats:sup>\n                      -generation video laryngoscope sometimes cannot be performed easily because there is no functional endotracheal tube (ETT) guide. Therefore, a rigid stylet is often required during tracheal intubation. The Endotrol\n                      <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                      tracheal tube (Endotrol) is a single use ETT that whole tube can be bent and slide easily into the trachea. We studied the intubation ease of a combination of an Endtrol and the McGrath\n                      <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                      video laryngoscope (McGrath), which is one of the 2\n                      <jats:sup>nd<\/jats:sup>\n                      -generation video laryngoscopes.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Sixty adult patients under general anesthesia were randomized into three groups: Group A: McGrath with Endotrol, B: McGrath with a rigid stylet attached ETT, and C: Direct laryngoscope with an ETT. The primary outcome measure was intubation time. Secondary outcomes were the number of insertion attempts required and the number of patients who complained of a sore throat after the procedure. The level of significance for each test was set at\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.05.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Intubation time (median [range] in seconds) was shorter in Group A (32 [27\u201354]) than Group B (37 [27\u201349]) and C (37 [27\u201350]) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.01 for both comparison). There was no significant difference among groups for the number of insertion attempts required. The number of patients with a sore throat was lower in Group A (0) than Group B (5) and C (6) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A combination of an Endtrol and a McGrath is effective for shortening intubation time and avoiding sore throats.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/sja.sja_301_17","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,8]],"date-time":"2018-01-08T01:07:11Z","timestamp":1515373631000},"page":"72-76","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Endotrol tracheal tube and McGrath Mac are an effective combination for oral tracheal intubation"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Azusa","family":"Shimazaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Showa University Hospital, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, 142-8666 Tokyo, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hironobu","family":"Ueshima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Showa University Hospital, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, 142-8666 Tokyo, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hiroshi","family":"Otake","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Showa University Hospital, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, 142-8666 Tokyo, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-1","first-page":"116","volume-title":"Use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation","author":"Shippey","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-2","first-page":"376","volume-title":"Use of airtraq, C-mac, and Glidescope laryngoscope is better than Macintosh in novice medical students' hands: A manikin study","author":"Kaki","year":"2011","journal-title":"Saudi J Anaesth","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/1658-354X","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-3","first-page":"199","volume-title":"Airway scope for difficult intubation","author":"Asai","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-4","first-page":"469","volume-title":"Evaluation of intubation using the airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy \u2013 A manikin study","author":"Maharaj","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-5","first-page":"473","volume-title":"The C-MAC videolaryngoscope:First experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation","author":"Cavus","year":"2010","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-6","first-page":"239","volume-title":"Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope","author":"Murphy","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Emerg Med"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-7","first-page":"CD011136","volume-title":"Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation","author":"Lewis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-8","first-page":"437","volume-title":"A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath \u00ae series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical Spine immobilisation","author":"Foulds","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-9","first-page":"e009855","volume-title":"McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in intensive care patients: The randomised multicentre MACMAN trial study protocol","author":"Bailly","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-10","first-page":"399","volume-title":"Nasotracheal intubation using the airway scope and an endotrol tracheal tube","author":"Imashuku","year":"2011","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-11","first-page":"86","volume-title":"The endotrol tracheal tube using McGrath can be a viable alternative to laryngoscope intubation","author":"Ueshima","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-12","first-page":"661","volume-title":"Usefulness of EndoFlex endotracheal tube for oral and nasal tracheal intubations","author":"Yamakage","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-13","first-page":"473","volume-title":"Use of the EndoFlex endotracheal tube as a stylet-free alternative in glidescope intubations","author":"Phua","year":"2008","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-14","first-page":"960","volume-title":"Combining the EndoFlex tube with fiberoptic bronchoscopy in difficult intubation","author":"Sugiyama","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-15","first-page":"1172","volume-title":"A prospective, randomised, cross-over trial comparing the EndoFlex and standard tracheal tubes in patients with predicted easy intubation","author":"Teoh","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"key-10.4103\/1658-354X.222357-16","first-page":"79","volume-title":"A comparison of conventional tube and EndoFlex tube for tracheal intubation in patients with a cervical spine immobilisation","author":"Gaszynska","year":"2013","journal-title":"Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.4103\/1658-354x.334743","type":"retraction","label":"Retraction","source":"retraction-watch","updated":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,4]],"date-time":"2022-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641254400000},"record-id":"34922"},{"DOI":"10.4103\/1658-354x.334743","type":"retraction","label":"Retraction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000}}],"container-title":["Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01437113-201812010-00013","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:52:29Z","timestamp":1787838749000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01437113-201812010-00013"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/sja.sja_301_17","relation":{},"ISSN":["1658-354X","0975-3125"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1658-354X","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-3125","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]}}}