{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:36:24Z","timestamp":1787841384214,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Thoracic interfascial plane blocks and modification (PECS) have recently gained popularity for analgesic potential during breast surgery. We evaluate\/consolidate the evidence on opioid-sparing effect of PECS blocks in comparison with conventional intravenous analgesia (IVA) and paravertebral block (PVB).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Prospective, randomized controlled trials comparing PECS block to conventional IVA or PVB in patients undergoing breast surgery published till June 2017 were searched in the medical database. Comparisons were made for 24-h postoperative morphine consumption and intraoperative fentanyl-equivalent consumption.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Final analysis included nine trials (PECS vs. IVA 4 trials and PECS vs. PVB 5 trials). PECS block showed a decreased intraoperative fentanyl consumption over IVA by 49.20 mcg (95% confidence interval [CI] =42.67\u201355.74) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 98.47%,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001) and PVB by 15.88 mcg (95% CI = 12.95\u201318.81) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 95.51%,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001). Postoperative, 24-h morphine consumption with PECS block was lower than IVA by 7.66 mg (95% CI being 6.23\u20139.10) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 63.15,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001) but was higher than PVB group by 1.26 mg (95% CI being 0.91\u20131.62) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      = 99.53%,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001). Two cases of pneumothorax were reported with PVB, and no complication was reported in any other group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Use of PECS block and its modifications with general anesthesia for breast surgery has significant opioid-sparing effect intraoperatively and during the first 24 h after surgery. It also has higher intraoperative opioid-sparing effect when compared to PVB. During the 1\n                      <jats:sup>st<\/jats:sup>\n                      postoperative day, PVB has slightly more morphine sparing potential that may however be associated with higher complication rates. The present PECS block techniques show marked interstudy variations and need standardization.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/sja.sja_382_17","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,8]],"date-time":"2018-01-08T01:07:11Z","timestamp":1515373631000},"page":"103-111","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Opioid-sparing effects of the thoracic interfascial plane blocks: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Preet Mohinder","family":"Singh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anuradha","family":"Borle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Manpreet","family":"Kaur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anjan","family":"Trikha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ashish","family":"Sinha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2011.06838.x","article-title":"The \u2018pecs block\u2019: A novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery","volume":"66","author":"Blanco","year":"2011","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R2-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1186\/2193-1801-3-409","article-title":"Pectoral nerves (PECS) and intercostal nerve block for cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation","volume":"3","author":"Fujiwara","year":"2014","journal-title":"Springerplus"},{"key":"R4-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.3344\/kjp.2016.29.3.189","article-title":"Serratus anterior plane (SAP) block used for thoracotomy analgesia: A case report","volume":"29","author":"Okmen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Korean J Pain"},{"key":"R5-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1016\/j.redar.2012.07.003","article-title":"Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): A novel approach to breast surgery","volume":"59","author":"Blanco","year":"2012","journal-title":"Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim"},{"key":"R6-20250920","first-page":"E421","article-title":"Serratus anterior plane block: A new analgesic technique for post-thoracotomy pain","volume":"18","author":"Madabushi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"key":"R7-20250920","first-page":"1341","article-title":"Anesthesia and analgesia in breast surgery: The benefits of peripheral nerve block","volume":"21","author":"Cal\u00ec Cassi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"key":"R8-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement","volume":"4","author":"Moher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"R9-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.4103\/2356-9115.184078","article-title":"Pre-emptive analgesia of ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block II with dexmedetomidine \u2013 Bupivacaine for controlling chronic pain after modified radical mastectomy","volume":"3","author":"Hassn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"R10-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000163","article-title":"Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery: A randomized clinical trial","volume":"40","author":"Bashandy","year":"2015","journal-title":"Reg Anesth Pain Med"},{"key":"R11-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2017.03.054","article-title":"Prospective double blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of the pectoral nerves (Pecs) block type II","volume":"40","author":"Versyck","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R13-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.IJA_62_17","article-title":"Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus serratus plane block for modified radical mastectomy: A randomised, controlled trial","volume":"61","author":"Gupta","year":"2017","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"R14-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.04.003","article-title":"Pectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block vs. thoracic paravertebral block for unilateral radical mastectomy with axillary evacuation","volume":"34","author":"Hetta","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"R15-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aew223","article-title":"Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"117","author":"Kulhari","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R16-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.egja.2013.10.006","article-title":"Thoracic paravertebral block versus pectoral nerve block for analgesia after breast surgery","volume":"30","author":"Wahba","year":"2014","journal-title":"Egypt J Anaesth"},{"key":"R17-20250920","first-page":"189","article-title":"Ultrasound guided modified pectoral nerves block versus thoracic paravertebral block for perioperative analgesia in major breast surgery","volume":"84","author":"El-Sheikh","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med J Cairo Univ"},{"key":"R18-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6558","article-title":"Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery","volume":"96","author":"Gurusamy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"R19-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","article-title":"Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample","volume":"5","author":"Hozo","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"R20-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1097\/YCT.0000000000000212","article-title":"Evaluation of etomidate for seizure duration in electroconvulsive therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"31","author":"Singh","year":"2015","journal-title":"J ECT"},{"key":"R21-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.06.018","article-title":"Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: A case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation","volume":"60","author":"Thiessen Philbrook","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"R22-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3021","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6908","article-title":"Meta-analysis with missing study-level sample variance data","volume":"35","author":"Chowdhry","year":"2016","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"R23-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1089\/jpm.1999.2.209","article-title":"Opioid equianalgesic calculations","volume":"2","author":"Gordon","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Palliat Med"},{"key":"R24-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-8-22","article-title":"Recommendations by cochrane review groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies","volume":"8","author":"Lundh","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"R25-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1186\/s40981-015-0018-1","article-title":"Pectoral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for breast cancer surgery: A retrospective comparison","volume":"1","author":"Morioka","year":"2015","journal-title":"JA Clin Rep"},{"key":"R26-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"g1251","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g1251","article-title":"Rates and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after major surgery: Population based cohort study","volume":"348","author":"Clarke","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R27-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.5152\/TJAR.2014.75508","article-title":"Comparison of spinal anaesthesia and paravertebral block in unilateral inguinal hernia repair","volume":"42","author":"I\u015f\u0131l","year":"2014","journal-title":"Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim"},{"key":"R28-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-002-6661-5","article-title":"Paravertebral block anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair","volume":"27","author":"Weltz","year":"2003","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"R29-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.12344","article-title":"Serratus plane block: A novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block","volume":"68","author":"Blanco","year":"2013","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R30-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1740","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0b013e3181da82c8","article-title":"Brief reports: Paravertebral block for anesthesia: A systematic review","volume":"110","author":"Thavaneswaran","year":"2010","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R31-20250920","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1007\/s003810000410","article-title":"A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension","volume":"17","author":"Taylor","year":"2001","journal-title":"Childs Nerv Syst"}],"container-title":["Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01437113-201812010-00018","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T13:52:30Z","timestamp":1787838750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01437113-201812010-00018"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/sja.sja_382_17","relation":{},"ISSN":["1658-354X","0975-3125"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1658-354X","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-3125","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]}}}