{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T12:28:17Z","timestamp":1787228897965,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Intrathecal morphine (ITM) remains the benchmark for post-cesarean analgesia but is frequently associated with opioid-related adverse effects. Regional analgesia techniques such as transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) are increasingly used as an opioid-sparing alternative. Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) have evaluated TAPB efficacy, yet findings remain fragmented, heterogeneous, and methodologically inconsistent. This umbrella review synthesizes and critically appraises the highest-level evidence on the analgesic efficacy and safety of TAPB after cesarean delivery (CD). A PROSPERO-registered umbrella review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR guidelines. SRMAs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating TAPB for post-cesarean analgesia were systematically searched across major databases until October 31, 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, overlap quantified via corrected covered area (CCA), and pooled findings reanalyzed using the metaUmbrella platform. Evidence credibility was evaluated using Ioannidis\u2019 criteria and certainty using GRADE. Fourteen SRMAs encompassing 125 RCTs (60 unique) were included. Study overlap was moderate (CCA 8.33%). AMSTAR-2 ratings revealed variable quality: four high-quality, eight low-quality, and two critically low-quality reviews. Reanalysis demonstrated that TAPB provided small but statistically significant reductions in 24-hour pain at rest (SMD \u2212 0.11), pain on movement (SMD \u2212 0.12), and opioid consumption (SMD \u2212 0.19). All achieved Class IV (weak) evidence with low GRADE certainty. No significant differences were observed in early (6\u201312-hour) pain or time-to-rescue analgesia. TAPB showed a favorable trend toward reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting, though with high heterogeneity. ITM offered modestly superior early analgesia, but differences were below minimal clinically important thresholds and accompanied by more opioid-related side effects. Despite extensive literature, the overall credibility and certainty of evidence supporting TAPB after CD remain weak due to heterogeneity, methodological limitations, and review redundancy. TAPB provides modest analgesic benefit and improved tolerability, supporting its role when neuraxial opioids are omitted, contraindicated, or declined. High-quality RCTs, standardized TAPB techniques, and core outcome sets are needed to refine clinical recommendations.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.4103\/sja.sja_998_25","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]],"date-time":"2026-07-02T05:00:41Z","timestamp":1782968441000},"page":"655-664","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Analgesic efficacy and safety of transversus abdominis plane block in women undergoing cesarean delivery: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Abhijit Sukumaran","family":"Nair","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Ibra Hospital, Ibra, Sultanate of Oman"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tuhin","family":"Mistry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nitinkumar","family":"Borkar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjae.2021.12.008","article-title":"Analgesia for caesarean section","volume":"22","author":"Neall","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJA Educ"},{"key":"R2-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0000000000002277","article-title":"And in collaboration with CEPRA a consortium initiative for peri-operative research (www.cepra.nu). Pain and adverse effects after caesarean delivery: A nationwide prospective cohort study","volume":"43","author":"Duch","year":"2026","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R3-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0000000000001259","article-title":"Analgesia after cesarean section-what is new?","volume":"36","author":"Lewald","year":"2023","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R4-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2024.05.045","article-title":"Non-pulmonary complications of intrathecal morphine administration: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression","volume":"133","author":"Renard","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R5-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.01.038","article-title":"Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations (part 3)-2025 update","volume":"233","author":"Sultan","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R6-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2147\/LRA.S138537","article-title":"Anesthetic techniques: Focus on transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks","volume":"12","author":"Mallan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Local Reg Anesth"},{"key":"R7-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.15339","article-title":"PROSPECT Working Group*of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and supported by the Obstetric Anaesthetists'Association. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: Updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations","volume":"76","author":"Roofthooft","year":"2021","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R8-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aes279","article-title":"Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"109","author":"Abdallah","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R9-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2016.07.009","article-title":"Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for pain relief after caesarean section: A meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"Champaneria","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"R10-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jopan.2023.07.017","article-title":"Quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in non-emergency cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"39","author":"Ferguson","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Perianesth Nurs"},{"key":"R11-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0000000000001552","article-title":"Transversus abdominis plane block versus local anaesthetic wound infiltration for analgesia after caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis","volume":"39","author":"Grape","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R12-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1097\/AJP.0000000000001014","article-title":"Impact of transversus abdominis plane block with bupivacaine or ropivacaine versus intrathecal morphine on opioid-related side effects after cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"38","author":"Huang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"R13-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1415","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2025.01.032","article-title":"The analgesic effects of novel fascial plane blocks compared with intrathecal morphine after Caesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"134","author":"Hussain","year":"2025","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R14-20260820","first-page":"844606","article-title":"Erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"75","author":"Mansour","year":"2025","journal-title":"Braz J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R15-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-012-9729-1","article-title":"Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"59","author":"Mishriky","year":"2012","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R16-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13563","article-title":"Transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration for post-cesarean section analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"153","author":"Riemma","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R17-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2954","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14881","article-title":"Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"47","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"R18-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jopan.2024.03.027","article-title":"Postoperative cesarean section pain management using transversus abdominis plane block versus intrathecal morphine: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"40","author":"White","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Perianesth Nurs"},{"key":"R19-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-021-01392-9","article-title":"Intrathecal morphine versus transversus abdominis plane block for caesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Yang","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"R20-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e07774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2021.e07774","article-title":"The efficacy of TAP block versus ilioinguinal block for post-cesarean section pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Yetneberk","year":"2021","journal-title":"Heliyon"},{"key":"R21-20260820","first-page":"195","article-title":"Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery. A systematic review","volume":"81","author":"Fusco","year":"2015","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"},{"key":"R22-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.3344\/kjp.2022.35.2.127","article-title":"The umbrella review: A useful strategy in the rain of evidence","volume":"35","author":"Choi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Korean J Pain"},{"key":"R23-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R24-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e070849","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2022-070849","article-title":"Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: Development of the PRIOR statement","volume":"378","author":"Gates","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R25-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1993.tb00368.x","article-title":"Abdominal nerve blockade for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section","volume":"19","author":"Kuppuvelumani","year":"1993","journal-title":"Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"R26-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"j4008","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j4008","article-title":"AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both","volume":"358","author":"Shea","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R27-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1983","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2014.2346248","article-title":"UpSet: Visualization of intersecting sets","volume":"20","author":"Lex","year":"2014","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph"},{"key":"R28-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1658","article-title":"Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology","volume":"14","author":"Kirvalidze","year":"2023","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"key":"R29-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e300534","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjment-2022-300534","article-title":"metaumbrella: The first comprehensive suite to perform data analysis in umbrella reviews with stratification of the evidence","volume":"26","author":"Gosling","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Ment Health"},{"key":"R30-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e000071","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjmed-2021-000071","article-title":"Conducting umbrella reviews","volume":"1","author":"Belbasis","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Med"},{"key":"R31-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018","article-title":"GRADE Working Group. GRADE Guidelines 30: The GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making","volume":"129","author":"Brozek","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"R32-20260820","article-title":"The ratio of confidence interval above the minimal clinically important difference","author":"De Cassai","year":"2025","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R33-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.3344\/kjp.24069","article-title":"Beyond measurement: A deep dive into the commonly used pain scales for postoperative pain assessment","volume":"37","author":"Choi","year":"2024","journal-title":"Korean J Pain"},{"key":"R34-20260820","first-page":"e83109","article-title":"Optimizing intrathecal opioid strategies for cesarean section: A comprehensive narrative review of pharmacology, clinical outcomes, and safety","volume":"17","author":"Moisa","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"R35-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1170","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.16034","article-title":"PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: An update","volume":"78","author":"Roofthooft","year":"2023","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.04.012","article-title":"Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3)","volume":"221","author":"Macones","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R37-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0000000000002127","article-title":"The implementation of intrathecal morphine for caesarean delivery into clinical practice, and assessment of its impact on patient-reported quality of recovery using the ObsQoR-10-Dutch scale: A single-centre cohort study","volume":"42","author":"van den Bosch","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R38-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.23736\/S0375-9393.25.18771-3","article-title":"The analgesic effect of transversalis fascia plane block after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis","volume":"91","author":"Dost","year":"2025","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"}],"container-title":["Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/sja.sja_998_25","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T12:01:23Z","timestamp":1787227283000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/sja.sja_998_25"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/sja.sja_998_25","relation":{},"ISSN":["1658-354X","0975-3125"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1658-354X","type":"print"},{"value":"0975-3125","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-12-19","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-12-30","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}