{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T19:50:23Z","timestamp":1793303423750,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":92,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]],"date-time":"2024-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1727740800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The aim of this literature study is to investigate the specific visual field defects for each glaucoma subtype and evaluate their pattern of progression. A systematic search was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on January 23, 2024. The literature search identified 3332 records after deduplication. Sixty-nine articles were included after screening and assessment for eligibility. Specific visual field patterns for primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, primary angle-closure glaucoma, and juvenile open-angle glaucoma were summed up. Since the search results on visual field progression only covered primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma, the further analysis was confined to these glaucoma subtypes. This systematic review summarizes the literature concerning visual field patterns in glaucoma for the ophthalmologist.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_143_24","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,25]],"date-time":"2024-12-25T20:00:18Z","timestamp":1735156818000},"page":"306-315","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Visual field patterns in glaucoma: A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Marlies F.","family":"Vandersnickt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan","family":"van Eijgen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Belgium"},{"name":"Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Ophthalmology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sophie","family":"Lemmens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Belgium"},{"name":"Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Ophthalmology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ingeborg","family":"Stalmans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Belgium"},{"name":"Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Ophthalmology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lu\u00eds A.","family":"Pinto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center of Ophthalmology and Scientific Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal"},{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universit\u00e1rio Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Evelien M.","family":"Vandewalle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Belgium"},{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, AZ Diest, Diest, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"958","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2012.05.025","article-title":"Comparison of the progression rates of the superior, inferior, and both hemifield defects in normal-tension glaucoma patients","volume":"154","author":"Cho","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R2-20260427","first-page":"e11686","article-title":"Epidemiology of glaucoma: The past, present, and predictions for the future","volume":"12","author":"Allison","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"R3-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4257151","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/4257151","article-title":"Glaucoma quality of life","volume":"2017","author":"Fea","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R4-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5685","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.09-5067","article-title":"Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements","volume":"51","author":"Schiefer","year":"2010","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R5-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.121.5.643","article-title":"Classification of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study","volume":"121","author":"Keltner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R6-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"R8-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1711","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16257-0","article-title":"Primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"363","author":"Weinreb","year":"2004","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R9-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/j.revmed.2018.12.001","article-title":"Primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"40","author":"Bertaud","year":"2019","journal-title":"Rev Med Interne"},{"key":"R10-20260427","first-page":"98","article-title":"Common visual field defect in the open angle glaucoma eyes","volume":"33","author":"Alipanahi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Rawal Med J"},{"key":"R11-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1442-9071.2003.00660.x","article-title":"Patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects in an older population: The blue mountains eye study","volume":"31","author":"Lee","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R12-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1995.188","article-title":"Diffuse and localised visual field defects to automated perimetry in primary open angle glaucoma","volume":"9","author":"Mutlukan","year":"1995","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"R13-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1590\/S0004-27492005000500017","article-title":"Location and frequency of visual field defects as measured by SITA (Swedish interactive threshold algorithm) strategy in primary open angle glaucoma","volume":"68","author":"Nascimento","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arq Bras Oftalmol"},{"key":"R14-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e68","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001747","article-title":"Central-most visual field defects in early glaucoma","volume":"30","author":"Chakravarti","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R15-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2019.5413","article-title":"Characterization of central visual field loss in end-stage glaucoma by unsupervised artificial intelligence","volume":"138","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R16-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2019.12.004","article-title":"Artificial intelligence classification of central visual field patterns in glaucoma","volume":"127","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R17-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-016-0173-z","article-title":"Comparison between visual field defect in pigmentary glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"36","author":"Nilforushan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R18-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.3126\/nmcj.v22i4.34181","article-title":"Pattern of visual field defects in newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients attending tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal","volume":"22","author":"Singh","year":"2020","journal-title":"Nepal Med Coll J"},{"key":"R19-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11674","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-91173-8","article-title":"Intraocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary angle-closure glaucoma, high-tension glaucoma, and normal-tension glaucoma in a Chinese population","volume":"11","author":"Jiang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"R20-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001872","article-title":"Comparison of superior and inferior visual field asymmetry between normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma","volume":"30","author":"Park","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R21-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2399","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2015.08.005","article-title":"Patterns of binocular visual field loss derived from large-scale patient data from glaucoma clinics","volume":"122","author":"Hu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R22-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(97)30279-6","article-title":"Repeatable diffuse visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma","volume":"104","author":"Chauhan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R23-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02763.x","article-title":"Diffuse visual field loss and glaucoma","volume":"72","author":"Asman","year":"1994","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)"},{"key":"R24-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001241","article-title":"Primary open-angle glaucoma with initial visual field damage in the superior and inferior hemifields: Comparison in a population-based setting","volume":"28","author":"Iwase","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R25-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(14)73702-X","article-title":"Visual field defects in diabetic patients with primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"111","author":"Zeiter","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R26-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1782","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2011.02.013","article-title":"Initial parafoveal versus peripheral scotomas in glaucoma: Risk factors and visual field characteristics","volume":"118","author":"Park","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R27-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2015.29.2.102","article-title":"Comparison of risk factors for initial central scotoma versus initial peripheral scotoma in normal-tension glaucoma","volume":"29","author":"Kang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Korean J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R28-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.09.012","article-title":"Association of CAV1\/CAV2 genomic variants with primary open-angle glaucoma overall and by gender and pattern of visual field loss","volume":"121","author":"Loomis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R29-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2439","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.14-16088","article-title":"Comparison of risk factor profiles for primary open-angle glaucoma subtypes defined by pattern of visual field loss: A prospective study","volume":"56","author":"Kang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R30-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.5935\/0004-2749.20160077","article-title":"Normal-tension glaucoma: An update","volume":"79","author":"Esporcatte","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arq Bras Oftalmol"},{"key":"R31-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(84)90505-1","article-title":"Comparison of visual field defects in the low-tension glaucomas with those in the high-tension glaucomas","volume":"97","author":"Caprioli","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R32-20260427","first-page":"133","article-title":"Patterns of early visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma","volume":"84","author":"Caprioli","year":"1986","journal-title":"Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc"},{"key":"R33-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(89)90854-4","article-title":"Visual field damage in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma","volume":"108","author":"Chauhan","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R34-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e386","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.12061","article-title":"Morphological and functional differences between normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma","volume":"91","author":"H\u00e4ntzschel","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R35-20260427","first-page":"274","article-title":"Visual field damage proximal to fixation in normal- and high-tension glaucoma eyes","volume":"39","author":"Koseki","year":"1995","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R36-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00917962","article-title":"Central function and visual field damage in glaucoma","volume":"16","author":"Lachenmayr","year":"1992","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R37-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000667","article-title":"Visual field defects in young patients with open-angle glaucoma: Comparison between high-tension and normal-tension glaucoma","volume":"26","author":"Park","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R38-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e318193c45c","article-title":"Normal versus high tension glaucoma: A comparison of functional and structural defects","volume":"19","author":"Thonginnetra","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R39-20260427","first-page":"519","article-title":"Focal and diffuse visual field defects: Their relationship to intraocular pressure","volume":"24","author":"Samuelson","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Surg"},{"key":"R40-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1808","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(93)31394-1","article-title":"Visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma","volume":"100","author":"Araie","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R41-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000002053","article-title":"Comparison of the structure-function relationship between advanced primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma","volume":"31","author":"Sung","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R42-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(14)74056-5","article-title":"Visual field defects in patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with high-tension glaucoma","volume":"114","author":"Zeiter","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R43-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1989.85","article-title":"The visual field in chronic simple glaucoma and ocular hypertension; its character, progress, relationship to the level of intraocular pressure and response to treatment","volume":"3","author":"Crick","year":"1989","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"R44-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327326","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/327326","article-title":"Visual field loss morphology in high- and normal-tension glaucoma","volume":"2012","author":"Iester","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R45-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1074","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1982.01030040052005","article-title":"Visual field defects in low-tension glaucoma. Comparison of defects in low-tension glaucoma and chronic open angle glaucoma","volume":"100","author":"Motolko","year":"1982","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R46-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(86)90596-9","article-title":"Comparison of visual field defects in normal-tension glaucoma and high-tension glaucoma","volume":"101","author":"King","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R47-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-004-0072-0","article-title":"Visual field damage in normal-tension glaucoma patients with or without ischemic changes in cerebral magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"48","author":"Suzuki","year":"2004","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R48-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2012.03.028","article-title":"Visual field characteristics in normal-tension glaucoma patients with autonomic dysfunction and abnormal peripheral microcirculation","volume":"154","author":"Park","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R49-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e103222","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0103222","article-title":"The prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in adult Asians: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"9","author":"Cheng","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"R50-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1957","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2016.05.026","article-title":"Pattern of visual field loss in primary angle-closure glaucoma across different severity levels","volume":"123","author":"Atalay","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R51-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1890","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(03)00666-3","article-title":"Patterns of visual field defects in chronic angle-closure glaucoma with different disease severity","volume":"110","author":"Lau","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R52-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1159\/000530175","article-title":"The patterns of visual field defects in primary angle-closure glaucoma compared to high-tension glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma","volume":"66","author":"Jiang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Res"},{"key":"R53-20260427","first-page":"5495","article-title":"Pattern of initial visual field defect in primary angle closure glaucoma","volume":"64","author":"Sim","year":"2023","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R54-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0420.2001.790318.x","article-title":"The visual field following acute primary angle closure","volume":"79","author":"Aung","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"R55-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1636","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.120.12.1636","article-title":"The severity and spatial distribution of visual field defects in primary glaucoma: A comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma","volume":"120","author":"Gazzard","year":"2002","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R56-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2011.01.008","article-title":"Patterns of damage in chronic angle-closure glaucoma compared to primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"152","author":"Nouri-Mahdavi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R57-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2001.15.1.27","article-title":"Comparison of visual field defects between primary open-angle glaucoma and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma in the early or moderate stage of the disease","volume":"15","author":"Rhee","year":"2001","journal-title":"Korean J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R58-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.17-22980","article-title":"Asymmetric patterns of visual field defect in primary open-angle and primary angle-closure glaucoma","volume":"59","author":"Yousefi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R59-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1159\/000048293","article-title":"Comparisons of risk factors and visual field changes between juvenile-onset and late-onset primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"216","author":"Ko","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ophthalmologica"},{"key":"R60-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2004.07.003","article-title":"Patterns of glaucomatous visual field progression identified by three progression criteria","volume":"138","author":"Boden","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R61-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001986","article-title":"Patterns of visual field loss in early, moderate, and severe stages of open angle glaucoma","volume":"31","author":"Germano","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R62-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.08.018","article-title":"Progression pattern of initial parafoveal scotomas in glaucoma","volume":"120","author":"Su","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R63-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S13101","article-title":"Progression rate of total, and upper and lower visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma patients","volume":"4","author":"Fukuchi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R64-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5717","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.18-25140","article-title":"Rates of visual field loss in primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma: Asymmetric patterns","volume":"59","author":"Yousefi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R65-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogla.2018.05.005","article-title":"Distribution and rates of visual field loss across different disease stages in primary open-angle glaucoma","volume":"1","author":"Yousefi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ophthalmol Glaucoma"},{"key":"R66-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1990.77","article-title":"The visual field in chronic open angle glaucoma: The rate of change in different regions of the field","volume":"4","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"1990","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"R67-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001391","article-title":"Long-term follow-up on glaucoma patients with initial single-hemifield defect: Progression patterns and associated factors","volume":"28","author":"Baek","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R68-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1129","DOI":"10.1001\/archophthalmol.2009.165","article-title":"Glaucoma with early visual field loss affecting both hemifields and the risk of disease progression","volume":"127","author":"De Moraes","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R69-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1688","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(00)00229-3","article-title":"Visual field progression in patients with initially unilateral visual field loss from chronic open-angle glaucoma","volume":"107","author":"Chen","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R70-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(89)33070-3","article-title":"Visual field change in low-tension glaucoma over a five-year follow-up","volume":"96","author":"Gliklich","year":"1989","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R71-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1458","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.09-3806","article-title":"Visual field progression differences between normal-tension and exfoliative high-tension glaucoma","volume":"51","author":"Ahrlich","year":"2010","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R72-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2557","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.13-13742","article-title":"Central visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma patients with autonomic dysfunction","volume":"55","author":"Park","year":"2014","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R73-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.118.4.481","article-title":"Rate of visual field loss in progressive glaucoma","volume":"118","author":"Rasker","year":"2000","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R74-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7864219","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/7864219","article-title":"Visual subfield progression in glaucoma subtypes","volume":"2018","author":"Su","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R75-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1097\/00055735-199504000-00007","article-title":"Pattern of visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma","volume":"6","author":"Araie","year":"1995","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R76-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000000842","article-title":"Effect of cataract opacity type and glaucoma severity on visual field index","volume":"93","author":"Chung","year":"2016","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"R77-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1997.177","article-title":"Apparent glaucomatous visual field defects caused by dermatochalasis","volume":"11","author":"Kosmin","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"R78-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(90)32467-3","article-title":"Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss. The effect of patient reliability","volume":"97","author":"Katz","year":"1990","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R79-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2020-318408","article-title":"Avoiding mask-related artefacts in visual field tests during the COVID-19 pandemic","volume":"106","author":"G\u00f3mez Mariscal","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R80-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.22336\/rjo.2018.42","article-title":"Influence of learning effect on reliability parameters and global indices of standard automated perimetry in cases of primary open angle glaucoma","volume":"62","author":"Tiwari","year":"2018","journal-title":"Rom J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R81-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1177\/112067211002000328","article-title":"Learning effect of Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with open-angle glaucoma","volume":"20","author":"De Tarso Pierre-Filho","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R82-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2010.11.031","article-title":"Learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form perimetry","volume":"151","author":"Lamparter","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R83-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.07-0866","article-title":"Estimating the rate of progressive visual field damage in those with open-angle glaucoma, from cross-sectional data","volume":"49","author":"Broman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R84-20260427","article-title":"The early manifest glaucoma trial: Study aims and design","volume":"40","author":"Heijl","year":"1999","journal-title":"IOVS"},{"key":"R85-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2013.7656","article-title":"Prevalence and nature of early glaucomatous defects in the central 10 of the visual field","volume":"132","author":"Traynis","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R86-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1546","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.01.045","article-title":"Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: Humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis","volume":"120","author":"Park","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R87-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2020.10.015","article-title":"Central visual field defects in patients with distinct glaucomatous optic disc phenotypes","volume":"223","author":"Ekici","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R88-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.10-5803","article-title":"Initial arcuate defects within the central 10 degrees in glaucoma","volume":"52","author":"Hood","year":"2011","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R89-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.08.033","article-title":"Value of 10-2 visual field testing in glaucoma patients with early 24-2 visual field loss","volume":"128","author":"West","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R90-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2797","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.15-19053","article-title":"Evaluation of central and peripheral visual field concordance in glaucoma","volume":"57","author":"Odden","year":"2016","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R91-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-10468","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of visual field test using subsets of the 24-2 test pattern for early glaucomatous field loss","volume":"54","author":"Wang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R92-20260427","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1097\/00061198-200604000-00001","article-title":"Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey matrix 30-2 test","volume":"15","author":"Brusini","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"R93-20260427","first-page":"254","article-title":"Repeatability of perimetric threshold estimation algorithms in glaucoma: A comparison of Sita-standard, Sita-fast and Humphrey full threshold","author":"Prokopich","year":"1999","journal-title":"American Academy of Optometry"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_374_25","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751328000000}}],"container-title":["Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_143_24","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T18:52:50Z","timestamp":1786647170000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_143_24"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"references-count":92,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_143_24","relation":{},"ISSN":["1319-4534","2542-6680"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1319-4534","type":"print"},{"value":"2542-6680","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-06-22","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-10-31","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}