{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T16:45:22Z","timestamp":1787071522257,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,3]],"date-time":"2024-07-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719964800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PURPOSE:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the mixing and matching of Lucidis extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted in one eye with another eye being phakic or having monofocal IOLs, in terms of improving visual outcomes, addressing presbyopia, and any associated discomfort.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This comparative cross-sectional study examines the compatibility of EDOF in one eye with the other being phakic or having monofocal lenses in cataract surgery. It included 50 patients with age-related cataracts, excluding those with other ocular issues. Surgeries followed standard techniques, patients underwent postoperative assessments over 6 months. Primary outcomes included visual acuity (VA) at distance and near and patient satisfaction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Among 50 patients (52% male, 48% female, age 62.8 \u00b1 10.98 years.), 18 patients received bilateral Lucidis implants, 18 had monofocal implants in one eye, and 14 retained natural lenses with varying opacities. Statistically significant differences were observed for distance uncorrected VA (UCVA) between Group 1 (LB) and Group 2 (LM) (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.013), whereas no significant differences were found among Group 1 (LB), Group 3 (LP), and Group 2 (LM), Group 3 (LP) on the basis of far and near best-corrected VA and UCVA (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &gt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in survey outcomes among all three groups, indicating the absence of significant dysphotopsia in any of the groups.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSION:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study highlights the versatility and effectiveness of mixing and matching Lucidis IOLs in one eye with the other eye being phakic or having monofocal lenses. Binocular Lucidis IOL appears ideal but may be combined with monofocal pseudophakic or phakic status of the eye without any undue fear.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_257_23","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,4]],"date-time":"2024-07-04T03:00:19Z","timestamp":1720062019000},"page":"371-377","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Mixing and matching Lucidis extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with other eyes being phakic or having monofocal intraocular lenses"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Zia Ul","family":"Mazhry","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, WAPDA Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Faiza","family":"Hassan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Optometry, WAPDA Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abdullah","family":"Mazhry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, WAPDA Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Laiba","family":"Asif","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, WAPDA Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Muhammad","family":"Saeed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, WAPDA Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S287573","article-title":"Time utilization and refractive prediction enhancement associated with intraoperative aberrometry use during cataract surgery","volume":"15","author":"Christopher","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R2-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.preteyeres.2022.101150","article-title":"Secondary outcomes of lens and cataract surgery: More than just \u201cbest-corrected visual acuity\u201d","volume":"95","author":"Hecht","year":"2023","journal-title":"Prog Retin Eye Res"},{"key":"R3-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.09.026","article-title":"Multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in 2020","volume":"128","author":"Rampat","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"R4-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-bioeng-082420-035827","article-title":"Simulating outcomes of cataract surgery: Important advances in ophthalmology","volume":"23","author":"Marcos","year":"2021","journal-title":"Annu Rev Biomed Eng"},{"key":"R5-20251201","first-page":"339","article-title":"Multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses","volume":"6","author":"Breyer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)"},{"key":"R6-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-015-0012-4","article-title":"Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation","volume":"15","author":"Carballo","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R7-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-014-2565-y","article-title":"Contrast sensitivity with bifocal intraocular lenses is halved, as measured with the Freiburg vision test (FrACT), yet patients are happy","volume":"252","author":"Anton","year":"2014","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R8-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1590\/1516-3180.20151331T2","article-title":"Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction","volume":"133","author":"Calladine","year":"2015","journal-title":"Sao Paulo Med J"},{"key":"R9-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1957","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S44415","article-title":"Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens","volume":"7","author":"Vryghem","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R10-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.11.032","article-title":"Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses","volume":"37","author":"de Vries","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R11-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1637","DOI":"10.1364\/OE.18.001637","article-title":"Visual effect of the combined correction of spherical and longitudinal chromatic aberrations","volume":"18","author":"Artal","year":"2010","journal-title":"Opt Express"},{"key":"R12-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.5301\/ejo.5001029","article-title":"A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens","volume":"28","author":"Ruiz-Mesa","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R13-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20180530-02","article-title":"A comparative evaluation of a new generation of diffractive trifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses","volume":"34","author":"Cochener","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R14-20251201","first-page":"436","article-title":"Six-month clinical outcomes with bilateral mix-and-match implantation of extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lenses","volume":"64","author":"Kim","year":"2023","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"R15-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20141021-08","article-title":"Clinical outcomes with a trifocal intraocular lens: A multicenter study","volume":"30","author":"Cochener","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R16-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1631","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.08.011","article-title":"Comparison of a trifocal intraocular lens with a+3.0 D bifocal IOL: Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"41","author":"Jonker","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R17-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.09.030","article-title":"Trifocal intraocular lens implantation to treat visual demands in various distances following lens removal","volume":"161","author":"Kohnen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R18-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1655","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2015-306811","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of a new pupil independent diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with a+2.75 D near addition: A European multicentre study","volume":"99","author":"Kretz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R19-20251201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001113","article-title":"Randomized and double-blind comparison of clinical visual outcomes of 2 EDOF intraocular lenses","volume":"49","author":"Scheepers","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R20-20251201","first-page":"2163809","article-title":"Visual performance after a unilateral or bilateral implantation of enlarged depth-of-focus intraocular lens in patients with cataract: A prospective clinical trial","author":"Choi","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol 2019"}],"container-title":["Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_257_23","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:47:25Z","timestamp":1787068045000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_257_23"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,3]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_257_23","relation":{},"ISSN":["1319-4534","2542-6680"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1319-4534","type":"print"},{"value":"2542-6680","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-10-16","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-05-06","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}