{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T19:24:35Z","timestamp":1787772275850,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PURPOSE:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the agreement between measurements by optical low-coherence interferometry (OLCI, Aladdin) and those by Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry (Scheimpflug-PCI, Pentacam AXL) in cataract patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This was a retrospective comparative study conducted in the United Arab Emirates. Axial length (AL), corneal power (keratometry, K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and corneal astigmatism in patients with cataracts were measured with both devices. Difference and correlation were evaluated with paired\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">t<\/jats:italic>\n                      -test (p) and Pearson's correlation coefficient\n                      <jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>\n                      , respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 164 eyes of 95 patients were analyzed (164 eyes for K, 155 for ACD, and 112 for AL). The mean AL taken by OLCI was longer than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (23.25 mm vs. 23.23 mm,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2264 0.0001), showing an excellent correlation between the two (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">r<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.9990). ACD measured by OLCI was 0.08 mm shallower than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.0003,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">r<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.7386). Corneal power measured by OLCI was lower than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (differences in mean K, flat K, and steep K were 0.05 diopters (D), 0.08 D, and 0.02 D, respectively), showing very strong correlations between the two devices (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">r<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.9614, 0.9445, and 0.9535, respectively). Only flat K values measured with the two devices were significantly different (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.0428). There were no statistically significant differences in the magnitude of astigmatism or J45 vector between the two devices (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.1441 and\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.4147, respectively). However, J0 vector values were significantly different (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.0087).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSION:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Although OCLI and Scheimpflug-PCI showed strong correlations for measurements of AL, K, ACD, and corneal astigmatism in cataract patients, there were small but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, flat K, and J0 vector. Thus, these two devices are not interchangeable for calculating intraocular lens power.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_50_21","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,20]],"date-time":"2024-05-20T06:28:13Z","timestamp":1716186493000},"page":"189-194","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Moonjung","family":"Kim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eui S.","family":"Han","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80876-0","article-title":"Effect of keratometer and axial length measurement errors on primary implant power calculations","volume":"16","author":"McEwan","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R2-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80917-0","article-title":"Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation","volume":"18","author":"Olsen","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R3-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(98)00113-5","article-title":"Partial coherence interferometry: A novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery","volume":"126","author":"Drexler","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R4-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.3928\/15428877-20080101-08","article-title":"Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation","volume":"39","author":"Narvaez","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging"},{"key":"R5-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2006.00774.x","article-title":"Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster","volume":"85","author":"Olsen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"R6-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.09.016","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation: Clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices","volume":"36","author":"Rabsilber","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R7-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.07.041","article-title":"Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China","volume":"42","author":"Hoffer","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R8-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e150","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.12824","article-title":"Determinants of anterior chamber depth in a large Caucasian population and agreement between intra-ocular lens Master and Pentacam measurements of this variable","volume":"94","author":"Fernandez-Vigo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R9-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-018-0927-x","article-title":"Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer","volume":"39","author":"Muzyka-Wozniak","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R10-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2016.09.019","article-title":"Axial length measurement failure rates with biometers using swept-source optical coherence tomography compared to partial-coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence interferometry","volume":"173","author":"McAlinden","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R11-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0143110","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0143110","article-title":"Comparison of anterior segment biometric measurements between pentacam HR and IOLMaster in normal and high myopic eyes","volume":"10","author":"Dong","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"R12-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.01.051","article-title":"Comparative analysis of optical biometers","volume":"42","author":"Sabatino","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R13-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-199706000-00019","article-title":"Power vectors: An application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error","volume":"74","author":"Thibos","year":"1997","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"R14-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2008.156554","article-title":"A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients","volume":"93","author":"Buckhurst","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R15-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2013-304002","article-title":"Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer","volume":"98","author":"Mandal","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R16-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.02.027","article-title":"Comparison of axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth measurements of 2 recently introduced devices to a known biometer","volume":"178","author":"Shajari","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R17-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80705-5","article-title":"Development of the SRK\/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula","volume":"16","author":"Retzlaff","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R18-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S238112","article-title":"Comparison of biometry measurements using standard partial coherence interferometry versus new Scheimpflug tomography with integrated axial length capability","volume":"14","author":"Haddad","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R19-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.3892\/etm.2021.9757","article-title":"Evaluation and comparison of a novel Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with standard partial coherence interferometry for biometry and intraocular lens power calculation","volume":"21","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Exp Ther Med"},{"key":"R20-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1809","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-018-1006-z","article-title":"Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin","volume":"39","author":"Ortiz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R21-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80338-0","article-title":"The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas","volume":"19","author":"Hoffer","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R22-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1356","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(97)80115-0","article-title":"Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations","volume":"23","author":"Holladay","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R23-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.3928\/15428877-20110210-03","article-title":"Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements conducted with Pentacam HR (R) and IOLMaster (R)","volume":"42","author":"Nemeth","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging"},{"key":"R24-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.2008.01278.x","article-title":"Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements taken with the Pentacam, Orbscan IIz and IOLMaster in myopic and emmetropic eyes","volume":"87","author":"Utine","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R25-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1764","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.05.036","article-title":"Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies","volume":"38","author":"Visser","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"R26-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20070401-09","article-title":"Corneal radii and anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLmaster versus the Pentacam","volume":"23","author":"Reuland","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"R27-12-20240830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20090512-08","article-title":"Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal curvature measurements using the Pentacam and Keratron topography systems","volume":"25","author":"Kawamorita","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_50_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T18:36:15Z","timestamp":1787769375000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_50_21"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/sjopt.sjopt_50_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["1319-4534"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1319-4534","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]}}}