{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T16:19:17Z","timestamp":1787847557818,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The current study aimed to retrospectively assess the cancer detection rate of needle localization biopsy of breast microcalcifications undetectable on sonography.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients who underwent mammography-guided needle localization biopsy of breast microcalcifications undetectable on sonography from January 2005 to December 2017 were included in the study. Patients with incomplete medical records were excluded from the study. Patient mammograms were categorized using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment criteria. The percentages of benign and malignant lesions were determined by pathological examination of surgically recovered specimens. Correlation between preoperative imaging assessment and final diagnosis was investigated, and the complications associated with the procedures were recorded.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 301 needle-localized biopsies were performed under mammographic guidance. The mean age of the patients was 58.18 \u00b1 7.73 years. The overall ductal carcinoma\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">in situ<\/jats:italic>\n                      (DCIS) and cancer detection rate was 23.3%. The proportion of patients with BI-RADS 0 category and undergoing second mammography was higher in the DCIS and cancer group. A total of 227 patients did not undergo second mammography. Of these patients, 70 demonstrated BI-RADS 4 category, 34 were diagnosed with DCIS, and 5 were diagnosed with breast cancer during subsequent follow-up.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Needle-localized excision of microcalcifications undetectable on sonography has high detection rate for early stage of breast cancer with low risk of associated complications. Regular mammography is a satisfactory follow-up tool for female patients with microcalcifications in the breasts. Additional studies should be performed to compare between needle-localized excision and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/tcmj.tcmj_191_20","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,21]],"date-time":"2021-03-21T15:25:23Z","timestamp":1616340323000},"page":"275-281","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Detection rate of breast malignancy of needle localization biopsy of breast microcalcification"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Kian-Hwee","family":"Chong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kuo-Feng","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hsiu-Wen","family":"Kuo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"I-Shiang","family":"Tzeng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jia-Hui","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.20107","article-title":"Global cancer statistics","volume":"61","author":"Jemal","year":"2011","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"R2-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8389(22)00650-9","article-title":"The current role of ultrasonography in breast imaging","volume":"33","author":"Jackson","year":"1995","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am"},{"key":"R3-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.207.3.9609890","article-title":"MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: Is there any value?","volume":"207","author":"Westerhof","year":"1998","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R4-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"849","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.217.3.r00nv27849","article-title":"US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications","volume":"217","author":"Moon","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R5-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.213.2.r99nv05413","article-title":"Diagnosis of breast cancer: Contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography","volume":"213","author":"Zonderland","year":"1999","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R6-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1985.01390290045007","article-title":"Needle localization of nonpalpable breast masses","volume":"120","author":"Bigelow","year":"1985","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"R7-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-198705000-00010","article-title":"Management of nonpalpable breast abnormalities","volume":"205","author":"Symmonds","year":"1987","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"R8-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.143.3.477","article-title":"Prebiopsy localization of nonpalpable breast lesions","volume":"143","author":"Gisvold","year":"1984","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"R9-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.13183","article-title":"Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: A systematic review","volume":"314","author":"Myers","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R10-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(85)92204-4","article-title":"Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography.Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare","volume":"1","author":"Tab\u00e1r","year":"1985","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R11-11-20240828","first-page":"349","article-title":"Ten-to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality","volume":"69","author":"Shapiro","year":"1982","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"R12-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2387","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.11361","article-title":"The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial","volume":"97","author":"Bjurstam","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"R14-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/31850970","article-title":"Evaluation of breast amorphous calcifications by a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography","volume":"85","author":"Scaranelo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"R15-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S35280","article-title":"Usefulness of hook wire localization biopsy under imaging guidance for nonpalpable breast lesions detected radiologically","volume":"4","author":"Masroor","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"key":"R16-11-20240828","first-page":"262","article-title":"Wire localisation biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: Reasons for unsuccessful excision","volume":"27","author":"Kouskos","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"R17-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3264","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2575-0","article-title":"Atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: An automatic trigger for excisional biopsy?","volume":"19","author":"McGhan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"R18-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181ee9fc7","article-title":"Benign breast disease","volume":"116","author":"Pearlman","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R19-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5974","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0931261100","article-title":"Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression","volume":"100","author":"Ma","year":"2003","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A"},{"key":"R21-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soc.2017.07.011","article-title":"When does atypical ductal hyperplasia require surgical excision?","volume":"27","author":"Racz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg Oncol Clin N Am"},{"key":"R22-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1451","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.177.6.1771451","article-title":"Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications: Comparison of film versus digital mammography, both using an add-on unit","volume":"177","author":"Becker","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"R23-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-014-0452-6","article-title":"Mammotome(\u00ae) and EnCor (\u00ae): Comparison of two systems for stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy in the characterisation of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications alone","volume":"120","author":"Mariscotti","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiol Med"},{"key":"R24-11-20240828","first-page":"3831","article-title":"Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) \u2013 A patients' survey","volume":"34","author":"Eller","year":"2014","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"key":"R25-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2005.12.004","article-title":"The impact of image guided needle biopsy on the outcome of mammographically detected indeterminate microcalcification","volume":"15","author":"Al-Attar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"R27-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1743","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-004-2373-6","article-title":"The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population","volume":"14","author":"Zonderland","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"R28-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-004-2593-9","article-title":"Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification","volume":"15","author":"Obenauer","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"R30-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2212010164","article-title":"Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: Pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy","volume":"221","author":"Berg","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R31-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2422052130","article-title":"Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy","volume":"242","author":"Burnside","year":"2007","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R32-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1378","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.09.3423","article-title":"The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories","volume":"194","author":"Bent","year":"2010","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"R33-11-20240828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2392042127","article-title":"BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: Interobserver variability and positive predictive value","volume":"239","author":"Lazarus","year":"2006","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["Tzu Chi Medical Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/tcmj.tcmj_191_20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T15:21:57Z","timestamp":1787844117000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/tcmj.tcmj_191_20"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/tcmj.tcmj_191_20","relation":{},"ISSN":["1016-3190"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1016-3190","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]}}}