{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T14:42:59Z","timestamp":1792852979221,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"abstract":"\n Background:<\/jats:title>\n Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is the most common cause of antenatal hydronephrosis. The incidence is around 1: 750\u20131500 live births. The standard treatment for (UPJO) is open pyeloplasty (OP) with a high success rate of 90%\u201395%. In the last 20 years, minimal invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) became an excellent alternative technique to OP which was historically the standard of care.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n The study participants were male and female patients aged 14 years old or less who had undergone open\/minimally invasive pyeloplasty during 2015\u20132020 and who had at least 1-year follow-up after surgery. The data were collected retrospectively from patients\u2019 charts. The patients were categorized into two cohort groups: OP and on the other arm minimally invasive pyeloplasty (robotic\/laparoscopic) comparing the outcomes as a 1ry endpoint. 2ry endpoints were hospital stay, duration of surgery, and anteroposterior diameter of renal ultrasound.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n \n A total of 133 patients were included in the study. Eighty-four underwent MIP while 49 patients underwent OP. 1ry endpoint was the success rate in both groups. The success rate was 94% (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n : 79) and 98% (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n : 48) in patients who underwent MIP and OP, respectively.\n P<\/jats:italic>\n <0.05 is considered significant.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n Open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty are comparable in terms of success rate. However, OP was associated with shorter hospital stays and shorter operative times.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4103\/ua.ua_101_23","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,3]],"date-time":"2024-07-03T02:01:12Z","timestamp":1719972072000},"page":"215-217","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Minimally invasive versus open pyeloplasty in pediatric population: Comparative retrospective study in tertiary centre"],"prefix":"10.4103","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Naif Hajar","family":"Alqarni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fahad Ali","family":"Alyami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohammed Abdullah","family":"Alshayie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alhasan Mohamed","family":"Abduldaem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohammed","family":"Sultan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Pediatric Surgery and Urology Department, Maternity and Children Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sultan Sulaiman","family":"Almaiman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hazim Mohammed","family":"Alsufyani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Urology Department, King Faisal Complex Hospital, Taif Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ibrahim Sami","family":"Abunohaiah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, College of Medicine and King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"R2-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1641","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-020-03331-8","article-title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children with complex pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): Results of a multicenter European report","volume":"39","author":"Esposito","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"R3-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2004.18.875","article-title":"Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient","volume":"18","author":"Casale","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"R4-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-020-01082-7","article-title":"Learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children: How to reach a level of excellence?","volume":"15","author":"Dothan","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"R5-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.11.056","article-title":"Long-term experience and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and young adults","volume":"185","author":"Minnillo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R6-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)00183-7","article-title":"Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Comparison with a cohort of open surgery","volume":"175","author":"Lee","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R7-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.09.008","article-title":"Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A comparative single institution study","volume":"189","author":"Riachy","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R8-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-019-0544-7","article-title":"Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction \u2013 A systematic review and network meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Uhlig","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"key":"R9-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2014.06.010","article-title":"Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty","volume":"10","author":"Liu","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"R10-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.03.062","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: Preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial","volume":"184","author":"Penn","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R11-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.10.056","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: Results of a randomized, prospective, controlled trial","volume":"197","author":"Gatti","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"R12-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2018.0586","article-title":"Minilaparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children less than 1 year","volume":"29","author":"Masieri","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"R13-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2020.09.018","article-title":"Surgical outcomes are equivalent after pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction","volume":"16","author":"Ebert","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"R14-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2020.10.031","article-title":"Resolution of hydronephrosis after pyeloplasty in children","volume":"17","author":"V\u00e4rel\u00e4","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"R15-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1080\/21681805.2021.1948098","article-title":"Comparison between mini-laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopy and open approach for ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatment in children","volume":"55","author":"P\u00e9rez-Bert\u00f3lez","year":"2021","journal-title":"Scand J Urol"},{"key":"R16-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.23736\/S0393-2249.20.03854-0","article-title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: A systematic review","volume":"72","author":"Masieri","year":"2020","journal-title":"Minerva Urol Nefrol"},{"key":"R17-20260506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-022-03929-0","article-title":"Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: A multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves","volume":"40","author":"Andolfi","year":"2022","journal-title":"World J Urol"}],"container-title":["Urology Annals"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ua.ua_101_23","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T16:29:41Z","timestamp":1786724981000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.4103\/ua.ua_101_23"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ua.ua_101_23","relation":{},"ISSN":["0974-7796","0974-7834"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0974-7796","type":"print"},{"value":"0974-7834","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-10-01","name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-04-01","name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}