{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T06:18:14Z","timestamp":1780467494639,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]],"date-time":"2015-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1448928000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Respir Care"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>BACKGROUND:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      During sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, oxygen delivery via a nasal cannula is often necessary. However, the influences of the oxygen delivery route and breathing pattern on the F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this simulation study was to investigate the difference in the F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      with a pharyngeal cannula versus nasal cannula during high- or low-tidal volume (V\n                      <jats:sub>T<\/jats:sub>\n                      ) ventilation and open- or closed-mouth breathing.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Six healthy volunteers were asked to breathe using 2 patterns of ventilation (high or low V\n                      <jats:sub>T<\/jats:sub>\n                      ) via a sealed face mask connected to an endotracheal tube that was retrogradely inserted into the trachea of a mannequin. The mannequin also had a pharyngeal or nasal cannula inserted into the pharynx or attached to the nose, through which oxygen (2 or 5 L\/min) was delivered. The mouth of the mannequin was kept open or closed by packing. We measured the F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      of every breath for 1 min at each setting.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      During low- and high-V\n                      <jats:sub>T<\/jats:sub>\n                      ventilation, the F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      was highest at a flow of 5 L\/min with a pharyngeal cannula. Oxygen delivery was higher with the pharyngeal cannula compared with the nasal cannula at all settings. Differences in flow did not result in significant differences in the F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      with high- and low-V\n                      <jats:sub>T<\/jats:sub>\n                      ventilation. At a flow of 5 L\/min via a pharyngeal cannula, open-mouth breathing resulted in a significantly higher F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      compared with closed-mouth breathing.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A pharyngeal cannula provided a higher F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      compared with a nasal cannula at the same oxygen flow. Open-mouth breathing resulted in a higher F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      compared with closed-mouth breathing when 5 L\/min oxygen was delivered via a pharyngeal cannula. The breathing pattern did not affect the F\n                      <jats:sub>\n                        IO\n                        <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      <\/jats:sub>\n                      in this study.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.4187\/respcare.04173","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,8]],"date-time":"2015-09-08T22:28:31Z","timestamp":1441751311000},"page":"1804-1809","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Effects of Breathing Pattern on Oxygen Delivery Via a Nasal or Pharyngeal Cannula"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"60","author":[{"given":"Natsuhiro","family":"Yamamoto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tetsuya","family":"Miyashita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shunsuke","family":"Takaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takahisa","family":"Goto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","unstructured":"American Thoracic Society\/European Respiratory Society Task Force. Standards for the diagnosis and management of patients with COPD. 2004. http:\/\/www.thoracic.org\/go\/copd. August 3 2015."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.3.5565.593"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4187\/respcare.10550453"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4187\/respcare.05500604"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.bja.a013584"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1185\/03007997409111871"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/59.12.1497"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/resp.12268"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0403200511"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1962.03050100021005"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aep280"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-197209000-00010"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-197903000-00005"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","first-page":"496","article-title":"Humidification of inspired gases during mechanical ventilation","volume":"78","author":"Gross JL","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gross JL, , Park GR. Humidification of inspired gases during mechanical ventilation. Minerva Anestesiol, 2012; 78(4):496\u2013502.","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"}],"container-title":["Respiratory Care"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.4187\/respcare.04173","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.4187\/respcare.04173","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.4187\/respcare.04173","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T06:15:49Z","timestamp":1777616149000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.4187\/respcare.04173"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.4187\/respcare.04173"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4187\/respcare.04173","relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-1324"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-1324","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}}}