{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,10]],"date-time":"2025-04-10T04:29:30Z","timestamp":1744259370860},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Termedia Sp. z.o.o.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Pol J Radiol"],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to investigate interobserver agreement during magnetic resonance cholangio\u00adpancreatography (MRCP) evaluation and the sensitivity and specificity of MRCP obtained with 3T scanners in cases of bile duct obstruction.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 37 patients who had MRCP and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) were included. Choledochal pathology was divided into two groups regarding the presence of stones as \u201cthere is stone or not\u201d. MRCPs were performed with a 3-Tesla system using respiratory triggered HASTE technique in axial and coronal planes and with T2 SPACE sequence in the coronal plane. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated separately for each observer. The average of both observers was calculated for comparison with other studies.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Thirty-seven patients were in the study population. Agreement between the observers was analysed, and Cohen\u2019s \u03ba value was evaluated as 0.84. For two observers, the sensitivity of MRCP was 93%, whereas the specificity was 75% for the first observer and 62% for the second.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this study we found a high level of interobserver agreement in evaluating MRCP. MRCP has a high sensitivity in detecting choledocholithiasis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.5114\/pjr.2019.89689","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,3]],"date-time":"2019-12-03T08:52:01Z","timestamp":1575363121000},"page":"419-423","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["The accuracy of 3T magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in suspected choledocholithiasis"],"prefix":"10.5114","volume":"84","author":[{"given":"\u00d6nder","family":"Yeni\u00e7eri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ne\u015fat","family":"\u00c7ullu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Burak","family":"\u00d6z\u015feker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emine Ne\u015fe","family":"Yeni\u00e7eri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"3061","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref-1139610","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.5946\/ce.2016.159","article-title":"Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography against endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing choledocholithiasis: the Indonesian experience","volume":"50","author":"Makmun D","year":"2017","unstructured":"Makmun D, Fauzi A, Shatri H. (2017). Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography against endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing choledocholithiasis: the Indonesian experience. Clin Endosc. 50: 486-490.","journal-title":"Clin Endosc"},{"key":"ref-1139611","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2016.10.025","article-title":"Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review","volume":"214","author":"Badger WR","year":"2017","unstructured":"Badger WR, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN. (2017). Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review. Am J Surg. 214: 251-255.","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref-1139612","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.060","article-title":"Use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice: not as good as we once thought","volume":"221","author":"Aydelotte JD","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aydelotte JD, Ali J, Huynh PT, et al. (2015). Use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice: not as good as we once thought. J Am Coll Surg. 221: 215-219.","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"ref-1139613","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.4329\/wjr.v7.i4.70","article-title":"Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature","volume":"28","author":"Polistina FA","year":"2015","unstructured":"Polistina FA, Frego M, Bisello M, et al. (2015). Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature. World J Radiol. 28: 70-78.","journal-title":"World J Radiol"},{"key":"ref-1139614","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2012.07.033","article-title":"Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing stones in the common bile duct in patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiograms","volume":"205","author":"Richard F","year":"2013","unstructured":"Richard F, Boustany M, Britt LD. (2013). Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing stones in the common bile duct in patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiograms. Am J Surg. 205: 371-373.","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref-1139615","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.135.2.148","article-title":"Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones","volume":"135","author":"Demartines N","year":"2000","unstructured":"Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, et al. (2000). Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg. 135: 148-152.","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"ref-1139616","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mric.2005.12.001","article-title":"Abdominal MR imaging at 3T","volume":"14","author":"Merkle EM","year":"2006","unstructured":"Merkle EM, Dale BM, Paulson EK. (2006). Abdominal MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 14: 17-26.","journal-title":"Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am"},{"key":"ref-1139617","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2493080389","article-title":"Possible biliary disease: diagnostic performance of high-spatial-resolution isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP","volume":"249","author":"Nandalur KR","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nandalur KR, Hussain HK, Weadock WJ, et al. (2008). Possible biliary disease: diagnostic performance of high-spatial-resolution isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP. Radiology. 249: 883-890.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref-1139618","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1399271","article-title":"Comparison of optimized 3D-SPACE and 3D-TSE sequences at 1.5T MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis","volume":"187","author":"Sudholt P","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sudholt P, Zaehringer C, Urigo C, et al. (2015). Comparison of optimized 3D-SPACE and 3D-TSE sequences at 1.5T MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Rofo. 187: 467-471.","journal-title":"Rofo"},{"key":"ref-1139619","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2009.09.041","article-title":"The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis","volume":"71","author":"Maple JT","year":"2010","unstructured":"Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MA, et al. (2010). The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 71: 1-9.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"ref-1139620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1148\/133.3.703","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of bile duct size","volume":"133","author":"Parulekar SG","year":"1979","unstructured":"Parulekar SG. (1979). Ultrasound evaluation of bile duct size. Radiology. 133: 703-707.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref-1139621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2003.22.9.879","article-title":"Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct: a sonographic study","volume":"22","author":"Bachar GN","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bachar GN, Cohen M, Belenky A, et al. (2003). Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct: a sonographic study. J Ultrasound Med. 22: 879-882.","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"ref-1139622","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.145.1.7122903","article-title":"A prospective comparison of the evaluation of biliary obstruction using computed tomography and ultrasonography","volume":"145","author":"Baron RL","year":"1982","unstructured":"Baron RL, Stanley RJ, Lee JKT, et al. (1982). A prospective comparison of the evaluation of biliary obstruction using computed tomography and ultrasonography. Radiology. 145: 91-98.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref-1139623","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-89-1-61","article-title":"Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of obstructive jaundice","volume":"89","author":"Lapis JL","year":"1978","unstructured":"Lapis JL, Orlando RC, Mittelstaedt CA, et al. (1978). Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of obstructive jaundice. Ann Intern Med. 89: 61-63.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"ref-1139624","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.142.4.725","article-title":"The insensitivity of sonography in the detection of choledocholithiasis","volume":"142","author":"Einstein DM","year":"1984","unstructured":"Einstein DM, Lapin SA, Ralls PW, et al. (1984). The insensitivity of sonography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Am J Roentgenol. 142: 725-728.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"ref-1139625","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2342-6-9","article-title":"MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Kaltenthaler EC","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kaltenthaler EC, Walters SJ, Chilcott J, et al. (2006). MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging. 6: 9.","journal-title":"BMC Med Imaging"},{"key":"ref-1139626","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2015.03.1926","article-title":"855 multicenter randomized phase II study: percutaneous biliary drainage vs EUS guided biliary drainage: results of the intermediate analysis","volume":"81","author":"Giovannini M","year":"2015","unstructured":"Giovannini M, Bories E, Napoleon B, et al. (2015). 855 multicenter randomized phase II study: percutaneous biliary drainage vs EUS guided biliary drainage: results of the intermediate analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 81: 174.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"}],"container-title":["Polish Journal of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.polradiol.com\/pdf-112548-108746","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.polradiol.com\/pdf-112548-108746","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,22]],"date-time":"2024-05-22T11:31:03Z","timestamp":1716377463000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.polradiol.com\/The-accuracy-of-3T-magnetic-resonance-cholangiopancreatography-in-suspected-choledocholithiasis,112548,0,2.html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,21]]},"references-count":17,"alternative-id":["112548"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5114\/pjr.2019.89689","relation":{},"ISSN":["1899-0967"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1899-0967","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,21]]}}}