{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,4]],"date-time":"2026-03-04T19:28:12Z","timestamp":1772652492219,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"AVES YAYINCILIK A.\u015e.","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["URP"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Abstract\n\tObjective: The majority of antenatal hydronephrosis disappears spontaneously. In our study, we have investigated the effective predictors\u00a0 for surgical decision in antenatal hydronephrosis. \n\n\t\u00a0\n\n\tMaterial and methods: Forty-four patients found to have renal pelvic anteroposterior (AP) diameter more than 10-mm on antenatal ultrasonograpy were followed after birth. The study groups were divided into two groups: follow-up and surgery group. On follow-up, longitudinal diameter of the kidney, parenchymal thickness of the kidney, AP diameter of renal pelvis, AP diameter of middle calyces on ultrasonograpy, and differential renal function, 20th minute clearance, half-life of radionuclide tracer (T1\/2), Tmax, Tmax-T1\/2, normalised residual activity (NORA) on diuretic renography were evaluated. Ultrasonograpy and diuretic renography measurements were compared in patients whose hydronephrosis resolve or proceeded to surgery. \n\n\t\u00a0\n\n\tResults: Forty-four patients were diagnosed as antenatal hydronephrosis, spontaneous resolution occurred in 23 (52%), and surgery was performed in 21 patients (48%). Mean age at operation was 8.5\u00b16.5 months (3-24 months). Mean AP diameter of renal pelvis was 29.5\u00b114.2 mm for surgery group, 13.6\u00b14.2 mm for follow-up group (p<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.5152\/tud.2017.81568","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,16]],"date-time":"2017-08-16T05:15:58Z","timestamp":1502860558000},"page":"361-365","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Effective predictors for surgical decision in antenatal hydronephrosis: a prospective multiparameter analysis"],"prefix":"10.5152","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"\u0130sa","family":"K\u0131ll\u0131","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Din\u00e7er","family":"Avlan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hakan","family":"Ta\u015fk\u0131nlar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P\u0131nar Pelin","family":"Kara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Feramuz Demir","family":"Apayd\u0131n","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ali","family":"Deliba\u015f","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ali","family":"Nayci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"3111","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,25]]},"container-title":["Urology Research and Practice"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/urologyresearchandpractice.org\/index.php\/pub\/article\/download\/3000\/2996","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,4]],"date-time":"2026-03-04T18:10:52Z","timestamp":1772647852000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/urologyresearchandpractice.org\/index.php\/pub\/article\/view\/3000"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,25]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5152\/tud.2017.81568","relation":{},"ISSN":["2980-1478"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2980-1478","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,25]]}}}