{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T22:21:33Z","timestamp":1773354093414,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Galenos Yayinevi","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Facts Views Vis ObGyn"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,30]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Hysteroscopic uterine evacuation of early pregnancy loss using tissue removal devices seems to be a safe and feasible procedure in selected cases. The hysteroscopic approach allows the precise localisation of the gestational sac inside the uterine cavity. The endoscopic approach allows one to perform hysteroembryoscopy before uterine evacuation and this technique appears to be more accurate than dilatation &amp; curettage for fetal chromosome karyotyping, with lower maternal cell contamination. This \u201cunder vision\u201d procedure may reduce retained products of conception rates and risk of intrauterine adhesions formation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.52054\/fvvo.14.2.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,2]],"date-time":"2022-07-02T13:21:07Z","timestamp":1656768067000},"page":"193-197","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Hysteroembryoscopy and hysteroscopic uterine evacuation of early pregnancy loss: A feasible procedure in selected cases"],"prefix":"10.52054","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"U","family":"Catena","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S","family":"D\u2019Ippolito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F","family":"Campolo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G","family":"Dinoi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Lanzone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G","family":"Scambia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"2811","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Abdala LT, Ruiz JA, Espinosa H. Transcervical embryoscopy: images of first-trimester missed abortion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:12-3.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.02.014"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 200: Early Pregnancy Loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:e197-e207.","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000002899"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carugno J, Grimbizis G, Franchini M et al. International Consensus Statement for Recommended Terminology Describing Hysteroscopic Procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29:385-91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.10.004"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Catena U, Campo R, Bolomini G, et al. New approach for T-shaped uterus: Metroplasty with resection of lateral fibromuscular tissue using a 15 Fr miniresectoscope. A step-by-step technique. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021;13:67-71.","DOI":"10.52054\/fvvo.13.003"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cholkeri-Singh A, Zamfirova I, Miller CE. Increased Fetal Chromosome Detection with the Use of Operative Hysteroscopy During Evacuation of Products of Conception for Diagnosed Miscarriage. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27:160-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.03.014"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"de Codt M, Balza C, Jadoul P et al. Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage. Front Surg. 2020;7:64.","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2020.00064"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ferro J, Mart\u00ednez MC, Lara C et al. Improved accuracy of hysteroembryoscopic biopsies for karyotyping early missed abortions. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1260-4.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0015-0282(03)02195-2"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Franchini M, Ceci O, Casadio P et al. Mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal or hysteroscopic morcellator: understanding the past to predict the future. A narrative review. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021;13:193-201.","DOI":"10.52054\/fvvo.13.3.026"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Golan A, Dishi M, Shalev A et al. Operative hysteroscopy to remove retained products of conception: novel treatment of an old problem. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:100-3.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.09.001"},{"key":"ref9","unstructured":"Goldenberg M, Schiff E, Achiron R et al. Managing residual trophoblastic tissue. Hysteroscopy for directing curettage. J Reprod Med. 1997;42:26-8."},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hamerlynck TW, van Vliet HA, Beerens AS et al. Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Loop Resection for Removal of Placental Remnants: A Randomized Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:1172-80.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.08.828"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:262-78","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt045"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jurkovic D, Ross JA, Nicolaides KH. Expectant management of missed miscarriage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:670-1.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10184.x"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Luise C, Jermy K, May C et al. Outcome of expectant management of spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: observational study. BMJ. 2002;324:873-5.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7342.873"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohr-Sasson A, Gur T, Meyer R et al. Office Operative Hysteroscopy for the Management of Retained Products of Conception. Reprod Sci. 2022;29:761-7.","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-022-00849-7"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Neilson JP, Gyte GM, Hickey M et al. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage (less than 24 weeks). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD007223. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 3:CD007223.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd007223.pub2"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Guidelines; 2021.","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-101025"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Neilson JP, Hickey M, Vazquez J. Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;CD002253. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 6:CD002253.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd002253.pub3"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shazly SA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Breitkopf DM et al. Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resection for the Treatment of Uterine Cavitary Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:867-77.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.04.013"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Smorgick N, Barel O, Fuchs N et al. Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: meta-analysis and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;173:19-22.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.11.020"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vitale SG, Parry JP, Carugno J et al. Surgical and Reproductive Outcomes after Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:204-17.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.10.028"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vitale SG, Riemma G, Carugno J et al. Postsurgical barrier strategies to avoid the recurrence of intrauterine adhesion formation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 226:487-98.e8.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.09.015"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weinberg S, Pansky M, Burshtein I et al. A Pilot Study of Guided Conservative Hysteroscopic Evacuation of Early Miscarriage. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:1860-7.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.04.017"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang J, Gilles JM, Barnhart K et al; National Institute of Child Health Human Development (NICHD) Management of Early Pregnancy Failure Trial. A comparison of medical management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:761-9.","DOI":"10.1056\/nejmoa044064"}],"container-title":["Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,14]],"date-time":"2025-02-14T05:55:30Z","timestamp":1739512530000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/fvvo.eu\/articles\/doi\/FVVO.14.2.020"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,30]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,30]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.52054\/fvvo.14.2.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["2684-4230","2032-0418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2684-4230","type":"electronic"},{"value":"2032-0418","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,30]]}}}