{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T12:56:15Z","timestamp":1774961775339,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Universa BV","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the clinical outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). An ambispective study was conducted in patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR and had adequate preoperative radiological shoulder studies (type A and 1 according to Suter and Henninger). Fifty-six patients with a minimum prospective follow-up of 3 years were included: 28 with a CSA &gt;35\u00ba and 28 with a CSA &lt;35\u00ba prior to surgery.\n\nAt the follow-up, shoulder function was evaluated using the Constant-Murley score (CS), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Quick DASH Scoring (QDS) and the Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS). The median CS showed no significant difference between groups: CSA &lt;35\u00ba was 67.8 (IQR 27.8) and CSA \u226535\u00ba was 69.3 (IQR 39.6) (p=0.606). For the CSA &lt;35\u00ba group, median SST, QDS and VAS scores were 75 (IQR 31.3); 6.8 (IQR 22.2) and 3.0 (IQR 4.8) respectively. In the CSA \u226535\u00ba group, the corresponding values were 75 (IQR 47.9); 11.3 (IQR 31.2) and 2.5 (IQR 7.0) respectively (all n.s.). Although scapular geometry has been implicated in the pathogenesis of rotator cuff disease, and both AI and CSA are simple radiographic tools, our results suggest that these parameters are not clinically relevant predictors of functional outcomes following arthroscopic RCR.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.52628\/91.4.14881","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T11:56:04Z","timestamp":1774958164000},"page":"479","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Critical shoulder angle does not correlate with patient outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair"],"prefix":"10.52628","volume":"91","author":[{"given":"M","family":"L\u00d3PEZ-FRANCO","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"E","family":"SERRANO GIL","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D","family":"GARC\u00cdA GARC\u00cdA","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"27062","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]]},"container-title":["Acta Orthopaedica Belgica"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T11:56:04Z","timestamp":1774958164000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.actaorthopaedica.be\/archive\/volume-91\/winter\/shoulder-elbow\/critical-shoulder-angle-does-not-correlate-with-patient-outcomes-after-arthroscopic-rotator-cuff\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.52628\/91.4.14881","relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6462"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6462","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]}}}